Seriously, no one is allowed to post about the offense, Rodgers or McCarthy without finished this required reading. Its a doozy and its very detailed, with examples from this season.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Read This, Be Smarter: The Undoing of McCarthy's Offense
Collapse
X
-
Over reliance on isolation plays (one on one matchups created by personnel and scheme), no post snap progressions, one target and then scramble drill. Its all covered here. Few timing routes, no man beaters.
The article hints that this is mainly Rodgers fault, but he and Sitton have been the ones talking about altering the offense. I think it McCarthy doing this to play to his QB's strengths, but he has gone too far in this direction and broken his offense.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
This is the exception noted in Paragraph 12, subsection J, line 47.Originally posted by Cheesehead Craig View PostI was told there would be no reading required when agreeing to joining this site. Only punch and pie and those are sorely lacking.Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Comment
-
Holy cow. I think the Mad Doctor has gone crazy. No wonder the struggles of the offense were hard to understand. I didn't understand what they were trying to accomplish.Originally posted by pbmax View PostOver reliance on isolation plays (one on one matchups created by personnel and scheme), no post snap progressions, one target and then scramble drill. Its all covered here. Few timing routes, no man beaters.
The article hints that this is mainly Rodgers fault, but he and Sitton have been the ones talking about altering the offense. I think it McCarthy doing this to play to his QB's strengths, but he has gone too far in this direction and broken his offense.
I guess this ties in with the thread you started earlier this year. http://packerrats.com/showthread.php...ood&highlight=
Scrambling may be one of Rodgers' strengths, but I remember when his quick release was considered one of his greatest strengths. I also wonder if there is a disconnect between the type of receivers TT is drafting, and the way MM is utilizing them. Seems to me guys like Cobb and Monty are the type of guys you want to get the ball to quickly in rhythm, so they can get yards after the catch. YAC seems to be gone now, but it wasn't so long ago that the Packers were the best in the NFL at it.Last edited by Joemailman; 09-21-2016, 12:08 AM.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
The article describes the situation, but it doesn't say WHY it is like that. It's like that because the line can't keep out even a 3 or 4 man pass rush for any length of time - like the article said Jacksonville used. That's true even with the Packers keeping TEs in for blocking many times. Rodgers simply can't just throw in rhythm - quick slants or outs much less deeper timing patterns because he is running for his life just about every damn play. Also, those rhythmic timing patterns, etc. work a lot better on first down/when it isn't a dead obvious passing situation - which the Packers get into so damn often because of the obsession with running on first down, often first and second down. That's usually unsuccessful for any significant yardage because the damn O Line just can't push anybody around.
Everybody here, probably McCarthy and Rodgers themselves too, would love to see the Packers have a more normal looking passing offense, but it just isn't possible with this O Line. As the article said, lately they seem to be preplanning for the inevitable need to scramble - which Rodgers makes work a lot, but which ain't exactly the ideal you hope for.
The short term solution is passing on early downs to set up the run - running plays only rarely. The longer term solution is to get a better O Line.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying PB but I think it's a little over-simplified/dramatic to say the offense is "broken" or "undone."Originally posted by pbmax View PostOver reliance on isolation plays (one on one matchups created by personnel and scheme), no post snap progressions, one target and then scramble drill. Its all covered here. Few timing routes, no man beaters.
The article hints that this is mainly Rodgers fault, but he and Sitton have been the ones talking about altering the offense. I think it McCarthy doing this to play to his QB's strengths, but he has gone too far in this direction and broken his offense.
The offense has become stagnant by becoming overly reliant on the second phase scramble drills, but it can be fixed and it will be through adjustments not a complete overhaul.
As the article says, it makes sense to take advantage of Rodgers' unique ability to scramble and create in the second phase but it can't do that effectively without the first phase threat required to make that as dangerous is it can/should be.
Getting the first-phase threat back requires Rodgers to do less pre-snap adjusting at the line, which is slowing down the offense and allowing defenses to be comfortable disguising and adjusting to Rodgers' adjustments, which defenses can easily diagnose by hand signals (Rodgers pointing to where the pressure is coming from, etc.) and line calls. The adjusting and re-adjusting has gotten out of hand because the defense can adjust easier and quicker than the offense.
So they're in the process of simplifying the offensive reads to pick up the tempo and get the quicker throw timing plays back to keep defenses simpler too and move the chains more consistently. Another big part of the first phase threat they need to recapture that will bring time of possession to their advantage and make second phases of plays the big-play game changers they used to (and should) be is the running game. The slow developing offense has caused the running game to lose its potency.
Here are the adjustments I'm hearing them indicate from what they're saying:
1. Speed up the tempo.
2. Simplify/reduce pre-snap adjustments.
3. Reincorporate quicker release timing plays back into the passing game.
4. Line up and pound it more with Lacy and Starks.
If they can do that effectively, the big-play impact of the second phase isolation game can return because history has shown that it really is hard for defenders to hang on for too long when isolated if those needed adjustments are in place.Last edited by vince; 09-21-2016, 06:48 AM.
Comment
-
Thanks for the Executive Summary, Vince.Originally posted by vince View PostMaybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying PB but I think it's a little over-simplified/dramatic to say the offense is "broken" or "undone."
The offense has become stagnant by becoming overly reliant on the second phase scramble drills, but it can be fixed and it will be through adjustments not a complete overhaul.
As the article says, it makes sense to take advantage of Rodgers' unique ability to scramble and create in the second phase but it can't do that effectively without the first phase threat required to make that as dangerous is it can/should be.
Getting the first-phase threat back requires Rodgers to do less pre-snap adjusting at the line, which is slowing down the offense and allowing defenses to be comfortable disguising and adjusting to Rodgers' adjustments, which defenses can easily diagnose by hand signals (Rodgers pointing to where the pressure is coming from, etc.) and line calls. The adjusting and re-adjusting has gotten out of hand because the defense can adjust easier and quicker than the offense.
So they're in the process of simplifying the offensive reads to pick up the tempo and get the quicker throw timing plays back to keep defenses simpler too and move the chains more consistently. Another big part of the first phase threat they need to recapture that will bring time of possession to their advantage and make second phases of plays the big-play game changers they used to (and should) be is the running game. The slow developing offense has caused the running game to lose its potency.
Here are the adjustments I'm hearing them indicate from what they're saying:
1. Speed up the tempo.
2. Simplify/reduce pre-snap adjustments.
3. Reincorporate quicker release timing plays back into the passing game.
4. Line up and pound it more with Lacy and Starks.
If they can do that effectively, the big-play impact of the second phase isolation game can return because history has shown that it really is hard for defenders to hang on for too long when isolated if those needed adjustments are in place.
My observation is simple science: In order to restore our electric offense, it is absolutely necessary to have three phases to it, not two.One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers
Comment
-
Agreed. Hopefully the running and quicker-release timing-based passing games take hold. Otherwise we could see more of the same. Forcing rodgers to speed things up and dictate less at the line will hopefully help that.Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi View PostThanks for the Executive Summary, Vince.
My observation is simple science: In order to restore our electric offense, it is absolutely necessary to have three phases to it, not two.Last edited by vince; 09-21-2016, 09:32 AM.
Comment
-
if teams are going to drop deep take the f'n shorter stuff! they need to go into dink and dunk mode to bring those DBs back in. as i said in another thread...take what they give you. stop holding the ball too long and asking the line to do more than pretty much ANY line is asked to do. every play doesn't have to end up in the end zone. moving the chains should be the first goal.
Comment
-
I haven't looked closely at film but the article seems to suggest the coverages are combining press man with deep safeties. Short stuff doesn't open up unless you have receivers who can beat the jam or pre-snap movement to free receivers up. For whatever reason, that hasn't been happening for quite a while.Originally posted by gbgary View Postif teams are going to drop deep take the f'n shorter stuff! they need to go into dink and dunk mode to bring those DBs back in. as i said in another thread...take what they give you. stop holding the ball too long and asking the line to do more than pretty much ANY line is asked to do. every play doesn't have to end up in the end zone. moving the chains should be the first goal.
Comment
-
Okay. This time Stubby says we are really REALLY going to get our receivers open and run the ball.Originally posted by vince View Post
Here are the adjustments I'm hearing them indicate from what they're saying:
1. Speed up the tempo.
2. Simplify/reduce pre-snap adjustments.
3. Reincorporate quicker release timing plays back into the passing game.
4. Line up and pound it more with Lacy and Starks.
If they can do that effectively, the big-play impact of the second phase isolation game can return because history has shown that it really is hard for defenders to hang on for too long when isolated if those needed adjustments are in place.
And behind closed doors the receivers are meeting with Aaron in an intervention, explaining how it hurts their feelings when he makes faces after they fail to run Z Cross Waggle Ten instead of Z Cross Waggle Five when the corner faked press coverage and backed off as the safety shifted with the TE in motion.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment

Comment