Official Packers vs Vikings Gameday Thread, Festivus edition

[pbmax]

You give Hundley time to show if he has grown. There is no exact number for how long it might take.

I think Rand is right the we know the ceiling, as the offense is currently constructed, is low for him in Green Bay. But if you want to see if he can improve, he needs snaps.

Giving them to Callahan is pointless since a decision doesn't need to be made on him in the offseason.

[Rutnstrut]

You give Hundley time to show if he has grown. There is no exact number for how long it might take.

I think Rand is right the we know the ceiling, as the offense is currently constructed, is low for him in Green Bay. But if you want to see if he can improve, he needs snaps.

Giving them to Callahan is pointless since a decision doesn't need to be made on him in the offseason.

I don't think Hundley is terrible. I do think the coaching he is currently receiving is limiting him.

[pbmax]

I don't think Hundley is terrible. I do think the coaching he is currently receiving is limiting him.

I was no fan of the offense. But he was missing his favorite receivers in the middle of the field: Adams and Rodgers.

[Tony Oday]

Hundley is fucking terrible. No amount of coaching will help him. TT and MM fooled themselves with him.

[Maxie the Taxi]

You give Hundley time to show if he has grown. There is no exact number for how long it might take.

I think Rand is right the we know the ceiling, as the offense is currently constructed, is low for him in Green Bay. But if you want to see if he can improve, he needs snaps.

Giving them to Callahan is pointless since a decision doesn't need to be made on him in the offseason.

None of this makes any sense.

If there's no exact number, then one could argue that he's already had enough snaps to decide.

If his ceiling is low, then we invest time in getting him to "improve" enough to reach his low ceiling?

If we can't decide on Hundley without real game reps, how do you decide if Callahan is better than Hundley without real game reps?

And I don't even have a dog in this hunt. I hope TT finds a different guy altogether, preferably a known-quantity retread with a track record.

[bobblehead]

I don't think Hundley is terrible. I do think the coaching he is currently receiving is limiting him.

The same way it limited Rodgers....same coaching. Nice call genius.

[bobblehead]

None of this makes any sense.

If there's no exact number, then one could argue that he's already had enough snaps to decide.

If his ceiling is low, then we invest time in getting him to "improve" enough to reach his low ceiling?

If we can't decide on Hundley without real game reps, how do you decide if Callahan is better than Hundley without real game reps?

And I don't even have a dog in this hunt. I hope TT finds a different guy altogether, preferably a known-quantity retread with a track record.

Teddy Bridgewater might make a nice backup....

[Harlan Huckleby]

We saw what an excellent backup quarterback looks like last night.

[red]

We saw what an excellent backup quarterback looks like last night.

3rd stringer no?

[Harlan Huckleby]

3rd stringer no?

No, I was thinking of Joe Callahan. Short. Space between his teeth.


Sorry, that didn't work that well, "excellent" spoiled it.

[Rutnstrut]

The same way it limited Rodgers....same coaching. Nice call genius.

Rodgers wins despite stubby not because of him.

[Maxie the Taxi]

Teddy Bridgewater might make a nice backup....

Maybe... ...If TT had called Belichick the day Arod went down, we might have had Jimmy Garoppolo here as a backup for 8 weeks. I wonder how the season might have gone differently if that call had been made.

[mraynrand]

Maybe... ...If TT had called Belichick the day Arod went down, we might have had Jimmy Garoppolo here as a backup for 8 weeks. I wonder how the season might have gone differently if that call had been made.

Garappolo isn't a backup. He was picked at a position to be a starter. Those guys only last so long before someone makes a move on them. I think if Rodgers had been lost for the season very early, the Packers might have gone after him.

[mraynrand]

^^^ But it wold have set up a dilemma. Older better QB versus good younger QB with unknown ceiling. Makes you consider trading Rodgers for picks and rolling with Crappola.

[Guiness]

None of this makes any sense.

If there's no exact number, then one could argue that he's already had enough snaps to decide.

If his ceiling is low, then we invest time in getting him to "improve" enough to reach his low ceiling?

If we can't decide on Hundley without real game reps, how do you decide if Callahan is better than Hundley without real game reps?

And I don't even have a dog in this hunt. I hope TT finds a different guy altogether, preferably a known-quantity retread with a track record.

This is along the lines I'm thinking. I think they've seen enough of Hundley to know what they've got, but do they know what Callahan has to offer?

I guess Hundley is likely back next season. Don't know how I feel about that.