Randall for Kizer

[The Shadow]

I wish we could have thrown in a 6th round pick to the Browns if they agreed to take Hundley off our hands.

[pbmax]

Only the man with the best avatar knows what he is talking about.

Even if you think Randall needs to be improved upon, which is defensible, there is no one better currently on the roster. House is a FA.

[Joemailman]

Only the man with the best avatar knows what he is talking about.

Even if you think Randall needs to be improved upon, which is defensible, there is no one better currently on the roster. House is a FA.

I hope you're not referring to Red.

[red]

I hope you're not referring to Red.

Smokey is one sexy man

[pbmax]

I hope you're not referring to Red.

Only Bossman's avatar hits me where I live. Or hope to live.

Actually, wist's avatar does too, but no one wants to think about that.

[Bossman641]

We need ed 2 starting cbs with Randall

Just because he was our beast cb at the end of the season, doesn’t mean he was any good

We were terrible against the pass last year, and he was a big reason for it

There's no way this team is better with Kizer then they are Randall. Packers aren't in win-now mode but they are a lot closer to that then rebuild mode. If Kizer is playing significant minutes the season is shot. We just lost our best CB from last year. We could have kept Randall, signed a DB and drafted another and had him as the 3rd or at worst 4th best CB.

[wist43]

You guys, lol...

Your love for Randall will never die!! You'll never, ever admit he sucked putrid lemons or that he was a terrible pick.

We just gave him away for next to nothing, and that was a damn good deal for us - yet, Randall is still beloved by the PR homers.

You guys are sumthin

[red]

You guys, lol...

Your love for Randall will never die!! You'll never, ever admit he sucked putrid lemons or that he was a terrible pick.

We just gave him away for next to nothing, and that was a damn good deal for us - yet, Randall is still beloved by the PR homers.

You guys are sumthin

But but, he got ints?

Yep, and pretty much ever play that wasn’t an int he was either out of position, falling down, or watching his guy make a huge play.

The ints were good, the other 98% of the plays were pathetic

[Bossman641]

https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/damarious-randall/9463

PFF ranked him as the 81st best cb.... average. I'll take average from my 3rd or 4th best cb given the alternatives, but I'm sure they're just homers as well...

[Bretsky]

Anybody reasonable would take Randall as a Number 3 CB, which is where he belongs

But is anybody excited about what we got for Randall ?

If you want to unload him, why not just get a 3rd and stop dicking around with a backup QB who isn't accurate and draft swaps

[Teamcheez1]

Anybody reasonable would take Randall as a Number 3 CB, which is where he belongs

But is anybody excited about what we got for Randall ?

If you want to unload him, why not just get a 3rd and stop dicking around with a backup QB who isn't accurate and draft swaps

The best you would get for Randall is a 5th or 6th. They also would have had to pick up his option for next year at $8.6M. There was more to this trade besides attitude.

[pbmax]

https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl...s-randall/9463

PFF ranked him as the 81st best cb.... average. I'll take average from my 3rd or 4th best cb given the alternatives, but I'm sure they're just homers as well...

If nickel is the new base D, then 81st best CB is in the 3rd starter tier (96 total CBs need to start)

[KYPack]

A bad trade. Randall is no shutdown corner and he’s the mother of inconsistency, but the Packers got rid of their best corner for a carbon copy of Hundley.

If you’re gonna trade for a Brownie, trade for Flash.

The best possible endorsement of Kizer.

This goof wanted Tebow, Joey Harrington, Johnny Manziel and other stiffs.

If the worst judge of QB's thinks Kizer is no good, he must have great value.

[red]

If nickel is the new base D, then 81st best CB is in the 3rd starter tier (96 total CBs need to start)

and he would be in the bottom 50% of that group

[pbmax]

and he would be in the bottom 50% of that group

If you trust those numbers and he did play better as the year went along.

The problem still is trading a starter for a backup.