If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
So you think the Vikings and Eagles flourished with backups last year because their overall talent is far superior to the Packers?
I think the Packers should be able to win 2 out of 5 games with a decent backup. Or they stink anyway.
Even if the Packers rely on Rodgers to have a chance of advancing in the playoffs, you still might need a backup who can win a game or two in the regular season just to get you in the playoffs. The backup matters a lot to the Packers. You are burying your head in the sand.
You don't think so? about the Eagles and Vikings I mean. yes maybe we could beat a couple of weak teams without Rodgers - even Hundley did that, right?
What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Ok, you and Partial both allude to Hundley's good play, you've convinced me to go back and watch the series he played. I really don't recall much but the sack he took from the right side and the tuck and run plays.
He was 6 of 9 for 60 something yards plus a running TD. That ain't horrible. No interceptions, one sack which the line clearly gets the blame for, several other sacks avoided when the O Line turned to shit like they do so often.
What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment