next 5 games...how many L's?

[mraynrand]

They then qualify for the playoffs, win a WC game and then lose a Divisional game that they never lead, scoring some meaningless 2nd half points, final score within 7.

Or they get an early pick six, some fat head tells all his family and friends watching the winning percentage of a team getting a pick six and then they lose horribly anyway giving up over 578 yards of offense.

[denverYooper]

i'm thinking at least 4. they'd be mostly dead then. not enough consistency on either side of the ball. the trend has been to fall behind early and that's iocane against a good team. 3 or fewer...it would take a miracle.

You're in luck. They're only mostly dead.

[texaspackerbacker]

Sheeeeesh! What a bunch of negativists!

Are you guys seriously that down on the Packers? Or do you just not have the balls to come out and express optimism?

[yetisnowman]

Sheeeeesh! What a bunch of negativists!

Are you guys seriously that down on the Packers? Or do you just not have the balls to come out and express optimism?

It's called being a realist, you know for the purpose in engaging in dialogue rooted in reality. Most people, like myself, prefer that in a sports forum. I'm not sure why you think it's great and courageous to just blindly say the Packers should go 16-0, or that the Badgers are going to win every game by 40 each season. Its not.

[yetisnowman]

For the Record I think the Pack wins 2 of the next 5.

[wist43]

I think 3 of them are nohopers... Rams, Pats, and Minn.

We'll be favored over the Dolphins, but not by much; and the Seattle game is a coin toss.

[mraynrand]

Sheeeeesh! What a bunch of negativists!

Are you guys seriously that down on the Packers? Or do you just not have the balls to come out and express optimism?

I'll listen to your perspective after I get through reading your analysis of the Wisconsin victory over Michigan.

[pbmax]

GB is going to beat the Vikings. The correct answer is two losses.

[texaspackerbacker]

It's called being a realist, you know for the purpose in engaging in dialogue rooted in reality. Most people, like myself, prefer that in a sports forum. I'm not sure why you think it's great and courageous to just blindly say the Packers should go 16-0, or that the Badgers are going to win every game by 40 each season. Its not.

yeah right. Fuck that shit. Some people are just cowards - so afraid of being wrong that they take the whiny way out.

You want to talk realism? As long as the Packers have Aaron Rodgers, even at maybe 70%, they are never out of games.

The difference between sports and politics is I call people like you shitheads when it is politics.

[texaspackerbacker]

I'll listen to your perspective after I get through reading your analysis of the Wisconsin victory over Michigan.

Fuck it, some people are just plain shitheads - reveling in defeat is for losers. Something unfortunate happens, and shitheads use that to justify their own patheticness.

[mraynrand]

Fuck it, some people are just plain shitheads - reveling in defeat is for losers. Something unfortunate happens, and shitheads use that to justify their own patheticness.

[Fritz]

Does anybody wonder if Gutekunst can turn the culture of the NFL so it becomes more open to trading? Can he pry an outside rusher from a team that's out of the running? This might be the chance to get football GM's thinking more like baseball GM's - if your season is already shot, why not dump salary in exchange for future resources (in this case, draft picks)? And if you're a marginal contender, this could, perhaps, vault you into stronger contention. It might make the league more fun.

Can he do it? Or are there too many constraints to allow this to happen in the NFL?

[gbgary]

it's not a shithead, bravery, or cowardly thing. it's looking at the situation and objectively making a guess. no one is reveling in anything. it's just a prediction. if they win 4 of 5 that would be fantastic...i just don't thing it's going to happen. i'll say the LA game may be the most interesting (other than the mia game) because they'll be fully healthy and they've had an extra week for the coaches to trick up something. no one is hoping for Packers losses...yet.

[gbgary]

Does anybody wonder if Gutekunst can turn the culture of the NFL so it becomes more open to trading?

it's already happened without his participation. i've never seen so much trade activity as this year. it takes guts to do something big and he's lacked that so far. he's thinking long term and there is no long term with Rodgers.

[yetisnowman]

yeah right. Fuck that shit. Some people are just cowards - so afraid of being wrong that they take the whiny way out.

You want to talk realism? As long as the Packers have Aaron Rodgers, even at maybe 70%, they are never out of games.

The difference between sports and politics is I call people like you shitheads when it is politics.

No they are trying to make an accurate prediction. You don't want to make predictions, you want to talk about fairy tales you would love to see come to life. There is nothing brave or interesting about it. You're dumb, delusional, repetitive, and boring.