Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Official Pack-St. Louis Rams of LA Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Official Pack-St. Louis Rams of LA Discussion Thread

    Pack fans, it is time to buy your tickets, book your hotel rooms and get your fire ready, cos, Atlanta here comes the Pack!

    Packers are gonna upset the damn Rams, and with the victory, the Pack’s confidence will soar higher than that of a burger-flipping loser who had just “mated” with a hot chick of African ancestry. Sometimes a boost of confidence is all it takes to motivate a downtrodden lad to take up arms and seek glory. In the Packers’ case, a boost of confidence could propel the Packers all the way to Atlanta.

    The march to the lost city of Atlanta begins this week. Power to the Packers!

  • #2
    Expect Jimmy G to light up the Colosseum. Rams suck at covering TEs, especially with their ‘backers. If the Son of Bum plays nickel and dime all day, I fucking hope Pack DONT try that smash mouth shit. Pack just ain’t built to grind through black holes and brick walls.

    Air it out all day. Great Arm of Butte will be awesomely sharpe, as he refuses to be overshadowed by that other Cal QB.

    Gurley is that white dwarf in the sky that gives life to the Rams’ potent offense. He’s damn good.

    Comment


    • #3
      Now THAT'S fandom hahahahaha - and to think some people call you ....... whatever it is they call you, Tank.

      You're on target tactics-wise also. Unleash Rodgers and outscore 'em.
      What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, let me bring you dreamers back to earth...

        Rams 38 Packers 20

        The line is 8.5... I'll be shocked if Packers cover.
        wist

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by wist43 View Post
          Well, let me bring you dreamers back to earth...

          Rams 38 Packers 20

          The line is 8.5... I'll be shocked if Packers cover.
          Hahahahaha. You think they'll score 20? You homers are pathetic.
          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by wist43 View Post
            Well, let me bring you dreamers back to earth...

            Rams 38 Packers 20

            The line is 8.5... I'll be shocked if Packers cover.
            The Dreamers, starring the beauteous Eva Green, is an awesome flick. It’s about 3 college aged youths who, while fighting the good far left fight, becomes distracted by coitus. Check it out.

            Comment


            • #7
              Any Tedophille (staunch Todd fan) who thinks free agency and trades only work in New England needs to take a hard look at the damn Rams’ roster.

              Btw, the goddamn Eagles also subscribe to Belichickism - they’re the defending champ.

              Belichickism > Polar Bearism

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                Any Tedophille (staunch Todd fan) who thinks free agency and trades only work in New England needs to take a hard look at the damn Rams’ roster.

                Btw, the goddamn Eagles also subscribe to Belichickism - they’re the defending champ.

                Belichickism > Polar Bearism

                Of course the Eagles have already lost more games in 2018 then 2017.

                Free agency is fine but you aren't going to be able to build your team long-term that way. You can't afford having 3 contracts like ARods or Macks or Brady on a team. There will not be enough room to sign anyone else or sign your own that is good to a decent 2nd contract.

                You need to hit your draft and fill in a few spots with FA. You aren't going to find a Mack in FA except in extremely rare instances (like a new coach who thinks he is smarter than everyone else in the world trading away his stud outside pass rusher).
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just typing the above makes me realize Oakland should have fired Gruden before the season for not making sure Mack was extended.
                  But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                  -Tim Harmston

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                    Just typing the above makes me realize Oakland should have fired Gruden before the season for not making sure Mack was extended.
                    that would have been awesome.
                    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                      Any Tedophille (staunch Todd fan) who thinks free agency and trades only work in New England needs to take a hard look at the damn Rams’ roster.

                      Btw, the goddamn Eagles also subscribe to Belichickism - they’re the defending champ.

                      Belichickism > Polar Bearism
                      We could use a Woodson, Pickett, and Green right about now.
                      "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                        Of course the Eagles have already lost more games in 2018 then 2017.

                        Free agency is fine but you aren't going to be able to build your team long-term that way. You can't afford having 3 contracts like ARods or Macks or Brady on a team. There will not be enough room to sign anyone else or sign your own that is good to a decent 2nd contract.

                        You need to hit your draft and fill in a few spots with FA. You aren't going to find a Mack in FA except in extremely rare instances (like a new coach who thinks he is smarter than everyone else in the world trading away his stud outside pass rusher).
                        Good points. You're never gonna rake in enough cash off that sledding hill to pay several huge contracts. Kids have money these days, but not that much.
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Almost a national game. Thom Brennaman and Troy Aikman with the call.

                          I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
                          While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
                          But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
                          They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                            Almost a national game. Thom Brennaman and Troy Aikman with the call.

                            There are only 3 3:00+ pm starts this week and 2 NFC games. When your choice is LAR/GBP or ARI/SF you are going to get 95% LAR/GBP coverage.
                            But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                            -Tim Harmston

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                              We could use a Woodson, Pickett, and Green right about now.
                              I think they are retired.
                              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X