Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No Kaepernick workout thread?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Sorry (again), I'm late (again) to the thread.

    So where is Tank? Seems this would be in his wheelhouse.

    Maybe.

    Yes?

    No?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by pbmax View Post
      There is little to no evidence he alienated customers. The TV decline originally cited was consistent with overall broadcast TV ratings decline for football and was in fact less decline than the rest of TV suffered.

      This isn’t about paying customers. This is about PR problems and no team wanting to defend political speech that isn’t as reflexively popular as veterans on the field holding the flag.

      The NFL acknowledged this by giving players an option to not go out on the field early. Had they come to that sensible solution in Year 1, it isn’t an issue.
      And even less evidence it would be an issue now. People and players have kind of moved on. A couple of years ago you had POTUS weighing in on the issue in his own inimitable fashion. I doubt that would be the case now.

      Having said that, the way Kap handled this weekend might cause some to think he's more motivated by creating publicity than by getting a chance to play football. That may scare some teams off. Rad suggested maybe he'll end up in Vince McMahon's new league. That might be a better fit.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Guiness View Post
        Ok, that's an interesting statement - do you feel he alienated the shit out of NFL fans? To the point that they'd stop attending/watching?

        It's the opposite of the way yetisnowman feels, and I wonder if you're right. Follow the money, the only explanation I can come up with for this is him in the league would hurt their bottom line.

        Myself, I'm surprised that one of the 31 egotistical fiercely independent billionaires didn't decide he was going to win them some games, flip the rest of the league the finger and sign him.


        Do you recall the pulled sponsors? I kinda do. That's cash money.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by QBME View Post
          Sorry (again), I'm late (again) to the thread.

          So where is Tank? Seems this would be in his wheelhouse.

          Maybe.

          Yes?

          No?
          He's busy flipping burgers for minimum wage.
          I can't run no more
          With that lawless crowd
          While the killers in high places
          Say their prayers out loud
          But they've summoned, they've summoned up
          A thundercloud
          They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Rastak View Post
            Do you recall the pulled sponsors? I kinda do. That's cash money.
            No I don't. I do remember Nike taking him on and making a boatload of money even as their shares fell temporarily on the panic.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by pbmax View Post
              No I don't. I do remember Nike taking him on and making a boatload of money even as their shares fell temporarily on the panic.

              That was well after the fact.

              Comment


              • #37
                Timely:

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Rastak View Post
                  Do you recall the pulled sponsors? I kinda do. That's cash money.
                  I don't...did anyone pull out?
                  --
                  Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I remember some advertisers saying that they would pull ads if the television stations showed the kneeling.
                    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hey Madtown, it seems like you're encouraging the turning of this thread into FYI material hahahahaha.

                      I'll just say, the despicable shit Kaepernick did and said is old business now. If he's willing to settle down and be normal, then he should be judged on how he can play football.

                      I saw the Lions/Cowboys game today, and Detroit got a lot of mileage out of a similar player - Driskel. I'd rather have somebody like him who can do some running than an immobile guy, noodle armed or not. That is especially true given the O Line that we have that can barely protect on a good day. As I think I said in a different thread, using Kaepernick like the Niners used him when he was second string would be a wise move.

                      Bottom line: I wouldn't mind the Packers getting him - although I strongly doubt that will happen.
                      What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        ^ A true litmus test for whether most have moved on.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          The new waiver.

                          Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL
                          Sunday edition of Commercial Law 101: If you’re Colin Kaepernick, under no circumstances do you sign this Release, which could operate as a backdoor waiver of any future collusion claims. Read paras. 2 and 7 together, and you’ll see the problem. (h/t⁦ ⁦@ProFootballTalk)





                          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            "losses (including death)" is metaphorically killing me.

                            Surprised they did not specifically mention "news leak". Though indemnifying "partners" covers anyone with rights to broadcast games.

                            Daniel Wallach @WALLACHLEGAL
                            Cliffs Notes version:
                            “Player... agrees to indemnify and hold harmless... the National Football League... from ANY and ALL claims... related directly or INDIRECTLY to the Workout...”

                            @WALLACHLEGAL
                            The “directly or indirectly” language in paragraph 7 is the key. If NFL was acting in good faith, it would have agreed to carve-out language (e.g., “Notwithstanding the foregoing” or “provided, however”) that expressly excluded any collusion claims from the scope of the release.

                            Brad_OTC @BradOTC
                            Had the exact same thought.
                            Even the beginning of paragraph 7 gives me pause with the mention of “consideration for the opportunity”
                            That reads to me as: to be granted this workout opportunity, you release the NFL from all future liability

                            Omar Kelly @OmarKelly
                            And this contract was specifically written for Colin Kaepernick.....it isn’t standard.
                            Last edited by pbmax; 11-18-2019, 08:26 AM.
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by QBME View Post
                              Sorry (again), I'm late (again) to the thread.

                              So where is Tank? Seems this would be in his wheelhouse.

                              Maybe.

                              Yes?

                              No?
                              I mistakenly assumed PBMax was the typical forum moderator: an uptight, shortsighted, narrow-minded hypocrite, as Yoko's late husband used to say. Reading this thread, I've discovered that PB is kinda cool.

                              Thus, I am yielding this fight to him.

                              Besides, y'all know that I've been kneeling with Kap since we knelt together during the damn anthem prior to the boring shareholder meeting at Lambeau, summer of '13.

                              Asked Kap why he ain't at the 69ers' camp. He was like, dude, I own the Packers! I was like, word - although that abomination Mr. Hyde spotted ya one.

                              Kap was like, lol, Hyde couldn't catch a cold standing naked with the majestic Polar Bears on the North Pole.

                              Capitalism is an iron trap
                              Capitalists are inhumane saps
                              Vive le Kap! Vive le Kap!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Funny, I honestly think the NFL would have seen to it that he was signed if he did the workout in good faith so it gets him off their case.

                                I agree the contract verbage gives me pause so does every other contract's verbage.

                                Much ado about nothing. I don't think Kap will ever play again.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X