Official On To San Francisco Week

[RashanGary]

How about we get the win anyways, no one has to die for it.
Sheesh, you superstitious or what.

It's colorful language. Relax vinncerino!

[George Cumby]

If you only knew.....

27

[pbmax]

Fuck Sherman. I hope the homeboy Davante puts his sweet moves on and leaves him with broken ankles.

I have never celebrated a single pass completion (that wasn't a TD) more than Jordy turning around Revis when he was with the Patriots and getting about 30 yards on him.

Despite the fact that I had nothing to do with it, made me very proud.

[pbmax]

27

Ah, I see.

[pbmax]

This is for red and anyone else who wants Rodgers to take some more chances and fewer sacks.

Football Perspective @fbgchase
Only a handful of offenses - Tampa Bay, of course, but also the Steelers, Rams, Browns, and Chargers - were more harmed by interceptions than sacks. Most offenses were set back because they took too many sacks relative to INTs - in particular, GB, SEA, JAC, TEN, WAS, NYG, PHI.

Expected points are the points you would expect for all teams given their field position. You can calculate expected points added by taking a play and subtracting the previous spot for the ADDED value.

[mraynrand]

If it’s a direct trade off in negative EPA, then who cares if they gets sacks as opposed to INTs? What’s the Average EPA loss per sack versus INT? What is it for the Packers? Does one INT equal 2 sacks, 5 sacks, ???

[George Cumby]

So that's good?

[mraynrand]

So that's good?

I’m very negative about the EPA

[MadtownPacker]

How about we get the win anyways, no one has to die for it.
Sheesh, you superstitious or what.

Where the fuck did I say anything about superstition? Saying win at all cost.

They get paid enough that if we lose one it is worth it. We all face occupational hazards, why is a football player any better.

[MadtownPacker]

It's colorful language. Relax vinncerino!

[MadtownPacker]

I have never celebrated a single pass completion (that wasn't a TD) more than Jordy turning around Revis when he was with the Patriots and getting about 30 yards on him.

Despite the fact that I had nothing to do with it, made me very proud.

Yeah that was boner level good.

[pbmax]

If it’s a direct trade off in negative EPA, then who cares if they gets sacks as opposed to INTs? What’s the Average EPA loss per sack versus INT? What is it for the Packers? Does one INT equal 2 sacks, 5 sacks, ???

The bonus is that the INT is a risk of throwing before a sack, but not the only possible outcome. If you traded INTs for sacks directly, you wouldn't improve much, if at all. I do not know the direct EPA for each event.

There is the chance of completing the ball on some additional, riskier throws. Depending on the rate of success, you lose less EPA with fewer sacks, gain some EPA with some completions minus the increase in INT.

For any single team, this is obviously dependent on talent and execution to work. You have to complete more throws to get the edge.

[pbmax]

This guy has a thread with all of Rodgers nuts throws: https://twitter.com/DustyEvely/statu...07974595108864

My favorite is this old gem.

[George Cumby]

He was a Magician in his prime.

[esoxx]

I’m very negative about the EPA

Take it to FYI