2020 Wide Receivers

[texaspackerbacker]

Yeah, not much evidence of improvement in personnel from that 13-3 team hahahahaha. The improvement comes from players we already had - obviously. I'm with you and always have been about Rodgers.

Coaching needs to clean up some things on D, then maybe some evidence will show up.

My point, though, was that just about everybody else has gotten worse.

[GB-Brandon]

Yeah, not much evidence of improvement in personnel from that 13-3 team hahahahaha. The improvement comes from players we already had - obviously. I'm with you and always have been about Rodgers.

Coaching needs to clean up some things on D, then maybe some evidence will show up.

My point, though, was that just about everybody else has gotten worse.

Last years 13-3 doesn’t matter anymore. That’s over.

I just don’t think we can say everybody has gotten worse yet. Just like our guys had no preseason games and need to clean things up so do other teams. Everyone is dealing with only so many padded practices etc etc.

I know RG is pumping up Minnesota like there some big thing but I have them finishing last in our division. They’re in a mini rebuild. I want to see what this Packer team does over the next 3-4 weeks.

We’re gonna have a real good idea about things in 4 weeks from now. Things will be much more clear.

[GB-Brandon]

We actually had people in here calling Rodgers “A borderline top 10 QB”

LMAO!!!

[texaspackerbacker]

As I said, I'm with you about Rodgers. Some, maybe a lot of worry worts and dumbasses inside the forum and outside whined about him, but he was never that far off, and now he appears to be as good as ever.

The only really tough opponent the next 4 weeks is New Orleans, and I doubt they are as good as last year.

As for everybody getting worse, a lot of teams have lost key players - Minnesota, SF, Chicago, etc.. Others are relying on aging fading players - Tampa, maybe N.O. Others had coaching changes and new schemes which might make them worse - the Dallas D. It ain't just guesses, and a few might actually be better.

The relevance of 13-3 is that thee are so many reasons this year why the team should be better. True, the schedule maybe is a little tougher, but there is zero reason to expect the team will drop off significantly.

[GB-Brandon]

As I said, I'm with you about Rodgers. Some, maybe a lot of worry worts and dumbasses inside the forum and outside whined about him, but he was never that far off, and now he appears to be as good as ever.

The only really tough opponent the next 4 weeks is New Orleans, and I doubt they are as good as last year.

As for everybody getting worse, a lot of teams have lost key players - Minnesota, SF, Chicago, etc.. Others are relying on aging fading players - Tampa, maybe N.O. Others had coaching changes and new schemes which might make them worse - the Dallas D. It ain't just guesses, and a few might actually be better.

The relevance of 13-3 is that thee are so many reasons this year why the team should be better. True, the schedule maybe is a little tougher, but there is zero reason to expect the team will drop off significantly.

If Rodgers continues to play like he did on Sunday then 16-0 is possible. I will NEVER BET AGAINST AARON RODGERS!!!

The issue will be health on the O-Line and at the receiver position. That’s why I wanted them to do more then just bringing in Wagner and Funchess. I’m not certain they are set up right now to fight off attrition on the OL and at WR for a 16 game season.

We shall see.

[Upnorth]

As I have said, the whole NFC other than the Packers is kinda down this season, maybe the whole NFL beyond KC and Baltimore.

It's doubtful that most on Brandon's list actually do have better rosters than us - maybe only the Niners, maybe not even them.

I think on a top to bottom look at rosters you have to have NO in a solid top three if not #1 across the whole nfl. I think they have the best roster top to bottom period.

Outside of ilb and nt the packers have a top 5 roster easily. Unfortunately once you factor in lack of depth at nt and our ilb we are only a solid top 10.

I know our d looked bearish but over half there points came in the last half the game when we were up at least 17 points. Prevent is a dangerous coaching choice...

[GB-Brandon]

I think on a top to bottom look at rosters you have to have NO in a solid top three if not #1 across the whole nfl. I think they have the best roster top to bottom period.

Outside of ilb and nt the packers have a top 5 roster easily. Unfortunately once you factor in lack of depth at nt and our ilb we are only a solid top 10.

I know our d looked bearish but over half there points came in the last half the game when we were up at least 17 points. Prevent is a dangerous coaching choice...

My evaluations were based on “Overall Rosters”. I would agree on the Saints. Aaron Rodgers can cover up lots of “roster deficiencies” when he does his thing.

He was top dog this week!!

http://twitter.com/PFF/status/1305850120999665667

With the Packers issues on the offensive and defensive line and front 7 along with some concerns now at safety along with lack of playmakers I just can’t put them anywhere near the top 5.

[bobblehead]

There is zero evidence of any improvement from the Packers overall roster at this time. In fact defensively you have serious question marks regarding several areas based on the same sample size that your making this assumption with other teams. Offensively it will be a miracle if this OL holds up at this rate of attrition. Nothing has been proven outside of Adams yet in regards to weapons!!!!

All that’s been proven is Aaron Rodgers Is still an elite QB which some jackass’s around here and possibly the Packers front office thought he wasn’t anymore!!!

Now everyone wants to act like it’s all good and bizz as usual.

You don't consider that beatdown of the queens a little bit of evidence??

[bobblehead]

We actually had people in here calling Rodgers “A borderline top 10 QB”

LMAO!!!

I can't recall, did I say that? I don't recall anyone saying it, but give his injuries last few years and his 6th QB rating as voted by players last year, its not an unreasonable position. His numbers last year had him at #20 total QBR. Football outsiders had him at 8. He may be back to his elite top QB self, but for last 5 years he was borderline top 10.

[bobblehead]

If Rodgers continues to play like he did on Sunday then 16-0 is possible. I will NEVER BET AGAINST AARON RODGERS!!!

The issue will be health on the O-Line and at the receiver position. That’s why I wanted them to do more then just bringing in Wagner and Funchess. I’m not certain they are set up right now to fight off attrition on the OL and at WR for a 16 game season.

We shall see.

Your entire schtick is so 2008. You need more Caps Lock though. BRETT FAVRE IS THE ONLY REASON THE PACKERS AREN'T 0-16!!!! Got news for you. its the Green Bay Packers, not the Green Bay Rodgers. This site is dedicated to packer fans, and although Rodgers fanboys mancrushers are aloud, they are mocked as well.

[bobblehead]

My evaluations were based on “Overall Rosters”. I would agree on the Saints. Aaron Rodgers can cover up lots of “roster deficiencies” when he does his thing.

He was top dog this week!!

http://twitter.com/PFF/status/1305850120999665667

With the Packers issues on the offensive and defensive line and front 7 along with some concerns now at safety along with lack of playmakers I just can’t put them anywhere near the top 5.

Arguing you is pointless. Any success is all Rodgers, any failure is all everyone else. You are the type who never owns your own faults. I can tell it from through a computer screen.

[GB-Brandon]

You don't consider that beatdown of the queens a little bit of evidence??

I’ve broken down the Queens game enough I think and given my opinion of what we faced or didn’t.

I have also laid out my concerns moving forward.

[GB-Brandon]

I can't recall, did I say that? I don't recall anyone saying it, but give his injuries last few years and his 6th QB rating as voted by players last year, its not an unreasonable position. His numbers last year had him at #20 total QBR. Football outsiders had him at 8. He may be back to his elite top QB self, but for last 5 years he was borderline top 10.

Actually I recall you saying “Part of you wished he(Rodgers) would just be gone and you were so tired of it” Etc Etc.

You poor thing! Having to deal with Aaron Rodgers and all his greatness and WINNING! Another deprived Packer fan!

[Joemailman]

Rodgers looked the best on Sunday he's looked in years. With the same top 3 WR's from last year. He's said it's due to being comfortable in the offense. Some might say it's because he was actually running the offense. Some have said the drafting of Love lit a fire under Rodgers. I think it might be a little different than that. I think maybe they sent Rodgers a message: We are going to run this offense. Whether the QB is you, or someone else.

[GB-Brandon]

Rodgers looked the best on Sunday he's looked in years. With the same top 3 WR's from last year. He's said it's due to being comfortable in the offense. Some might say it's because he was actually running the offense. Some have said the drafting of Love lit a fire under Rodgers. I think it might be a little different than that. I think maybe they sent Rodgers a message: We are going to run this offense. Whether the QB is you, or someone else.

The thing is he was pretty sharp and on point before he hurt his shoulder. 2018 he had a bad knee and it was a disaster season. Last year the guy still threw for 4k yards with 26 TD and 4 picks. Just about any team in the NFL would do just about anything for that and that was his first year in a brand new offense.

Yes, we saw the live arm Sunday and I don’t think it’s ever been in question that Aaron Rodgers could still make “All The Throws”. He has obviously sharpened up his game. Whether people want to believe it was because they drafted Jordan Love or he broke up with his GF or whatever. Players go through this sometimes throughout their career.

Now is the time to “Double Down” and go get another playmaker weapon.