Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

“Aaron Rodgers Revenge Tour”

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    The best thing for Rodgers at this point it to keep it clean like he has and work his way out like Brady did in NE and get somewhere that will appreciate him more and be more willing to get what he needs to win a Title.

    Some Packer fans deserve Jordan Love and what comes with it.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
      I think what he is saying is that look at what a good Run game and Oline is doing for a mediocre QB when we have an all time great.
      Yes. Was agreeing with Bobble's edit.
      You can have a decent offense without top-10 WRs. In fact, GB's offense is waaay ahead of where it was last year at this time. They've put up back to back 40 point games (they put up 40+ once last year) and are over 1000 yards of offense. You can blame that on MIN and DET, but those are division foes. Rodgers looks much better this year -- more accurate, throwing on time, even using the middle of the field. Having Jones and some RB depth is making a huge difference, and the OL is blocking very well (1 sack in 2 games!).

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by run pMc View Post
        Yes. Was agreeing with Bobble's edit.
        You can have a decent offense without top-10 WRs. In fact, GB's offense is waaay ahead of where it was last year at this time. They've put up back to back 40 point games (they put up 40+ once last year) and are over 1000 yards of offense. You can blame that on MIN and DET, but those are division foes. Rodgers looks much better this year -- more accurate, throwing on time, even using the middle of the field. Having Jones and some RB depth is making a huge difference, and the OL is blocking very well (1 sack in 2 games!).

        The question remains is “Can They Win A Super Bowl With All These Average Weapons?”

        Can they take down the top teams in the NFC or beat the Chiefs or the Ravens in the Super Bowl?

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
          If we add

          Mike Tonyan 57.9 &
          Jace Sternberger 37.5

          The Eye sore or Black eye just get bigger!

          This evil Tyrant Brain Gutekunst needs to be removed immediately if he does not address this.
          So you are finally admitting that the only thing really lacking from this offense is TE production? You are a broken record. I normally throw those in the trash.
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
            So you are finally admitting that the only thing really lacking from this offense is TE production? You are a broken record. I normally throw those in the trash.
            No. I have been very clear about having a legit “No.2 Option” outside Adams. I could give a rats ass if it’s a TE or a Receiver at this point!!!

            Comment


            • #81
              Regarding that "cesspool of mediocrity", Aaron Jones is top 3 or 4 in the league now, maybe the best RB; Davante Adams is top 3 or 4 also. I doubt anybody has better backups at RB than the Packers, and we have (whether Brandon believes it or not) two damn good other WRs in Lazard and MVS. And our O Line has as many as 3 star quality players, depending on whose opinion you buy - Jenkins, Linsley, and Bakhtiari (in that order IMO hahahaha). TE is really the only weakness, and Tonyan is showing signs of being good there.
              What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                Regarding that "cesspool of mediocrity", Aaron Jones is top 3 or 4 in the league now, maybe the best RB; Davante Adams is top 3 or 4 also. I doubt anybody has better backups at RB than the Packers, and we have (whether Brandon believes it or not) two damn good other WRs in Lazard and MVS. And our O Line has as many as 3 star quality players, depending on whose opinion you buy - Jenkins, Linsley, and Bakhtiari (in that order IMO hahahaha). TE is really the only weakness, and Tonyan is showing signs of being good there.
                I said “Outside of Adams and Jones”

                And PFf ratings don’t support your fantasy logic after that.

                Comment


                • #83
                  The “PROPAGANDA” is getting a little to thick for me in here. Not sure how much more I can take of all this misinformation and banter.

                  Such a Mockery of Fact!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Fuck PFF.
                    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                      Fuck PFF.
                      Do you have a better rating system? You sound like a little baby throwing a temper tantrum cause the facts don’t tell you what you want to hear.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        So now it’s let’s just turn a blind eye to all fact. A rating system used by some NFL GM’s isn’t good enough and is faulty because “We Don’t Like the Results” LMAO!!

                        Just pathetic.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          The rating system I prefer has numbers like 13-3 and 2-0, also best in the NFL in points and yardage.
                          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Some people can sure suck the ever-loving fun out of watching the Packers.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                              The rating system I prefer has numbers like 13-3 and 2-0, also best in the NFL in points and yardage.
                              That’s great and while 2-0 is a great start, to not put things into context could and would lead to such a similar failure in the end that we know all to well. Did anybody really believe the Packers wouldn’t be 2-0 right now? I had them going 10-6 and winning both these games so this isn’t some big surprise!!!

                              Now is certainly not the time to for everyone to be padding themselves on their back. If we can’t see the weaknesses with a “Clear Eye” then we won’t give ourselves the opportunity to get better!

                              It’s that simple.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by SudsMcBucky View Post
                                Some people can sure suck the ever-loving fun out of watching the Packers.
                                Not sure how simply posting ratings from what most believe a reliable source to be “Sucking The Love Out Of Watching Football”

                                I suppose we can all just sit here and tell each other what we want to hear.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X