Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers defense discussion thread
Collapse
X
-
Oh, they were playing prevent. They DBs were on their heels trying to stop big plays instead of playing downhill. "prevent" when in an open field simply opens up gimme 20 yard completions underneath though. A relic of the past that coaches everywhere refuse to put out to pasture.Originally posted by Fosco33 View PostExactly. I’ve never understood prevent. Was it prevent or just bad defense or something else?The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
There are better options than prevent. Just play defense and make sure the DBs lean a little more on the side of caution.Originally posted by bobblehead View PostOh, they were playing prevent. They DBs were on their heels trying to stop big plays instead of playing downhill. "prevent" when in an open field simply opens up gimme 20 yard completions underneath though. A relic of the past that coaches everywhere refuse to put out to pasture.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
“IF” the Packers made the “Right Moves” and built a top 5 defense I would agree with you that “They Would Have Enough On Offense” with AR12 playing at an Elite level.Originally posted by bobblehead View PostProbably your best post so far. All pretty much accurate. However, Gary did lead team in pressures sunday and we didn't trade up for him...but Burns or Sweat in a trade back would have been better. However, at the end of the day, results matter and we are now 14-3 in the last 17 regular season games.
The only thing I disagree with you on is your continued mantra that we need to squander more resources at WR when our offense is plenty good to win an Owl.
However, I don’t believe this defense is anywhere near top 5.
“No Tickey No Watchy”
Comment
-
Then they won't win an Owl. We have seen Rodgers with a top 5 D win an Owl. We have seen Rodgers break a ton of passing records and fall short...more than once.Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post“IF” the Packers made the “Right Moves” and built a top 5 defense I would agree with you that “They Would Have Enough On Offense” with AR12 playing at an Elite level.
However, I don’t believe this defense is anywhere near top 5.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Originally posted by KYPack View PostOf the four score or so that have been "Patlerized" in the past, you do have one distinction. (But not the one your think you have)
You are the only dumb bastard that Patler has shredded, but still doesn't understand what he meant.
Tank not only tries to beat a dead horse, he's so goofy that he tries to ride it!
Tank has been........ KYed.
Comment
-
Skinny pants made with stretchy/flexible fabrics, something like the pair the chick appears to be wearing, has gotta be the merchants’ greatest innovation since the invention of the wheel.Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
Just wanted to feel the power between my legs....YEE HAW!!!
Biology didn’t bless me with a 6’4” muscular body, so I don’t always look good in said skinny, stretchy pants (or jeans). But they’re pretty comfortable while flipping burgers, which requires a tons of walking and bending. Plus, I no longer have to change into workout cloths after clocking out. Can immediately hit the course and comfortably play a round of disc golf.
Comment
-
...and once again, you are wrong.Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View PostOh mother of irony, Crumby has been SHAMROCKED!
(Fact: At the birth of this site, ole Patler went by the name “ShamrockFan69.”)
I remain the only one who has never been “Patlerized” or “Shamrocked.” Back in them glorious JSO days, Patler arrogantly argued that it was impossible for the Packers to retain Wahle, Rivera and D-Sharp. Patler was “tanked” after I flawlessly - with math - debunked his argument.
I have never gone by the name "ShamrockFan69".Last edited by Patler; 09-19-2020, 04:07 PM.
Comment

Comment