Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers defense discussion thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by KYPack View Post
    Of the four score or so that have been "Patlerized" in the past, you do have one distinction. (But not the one your think you have)

    You are the only dumb bastard that Patler has shredded, but still doesn't understand what he meant.

    Tank not only tries to beat a dead horse, he's so goofy that he tries to ride it!

    Just wanted to feel the power between my legs....YEE HAW!!!
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Fosco33 View Post
      Exactly. I’ve never understood prevent. Was it prevent or just bad defense or something else?
      Oh, they were playing prevent. They DBs were on their heels trying to stop big plays instead of playing downhill. "prevent" when in an open field simply opens up gimme 20 yard completions underneath though. A relic of the past that coaches everywhere refuse to put out to pasture.
      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
        Oh, they were playing prevent. They DBs were on their heels trying to stop big plays instead of playing downhill. "prevent" when in an open field simply opens up gimme 20 yard completions underneath though. A relic of the past that coaches everywhere refuse to put out to pasture.
        There are better options than prevent. Just play defense and make sure the DBs lean a little more on the side of caution.
        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
          Probably your best post so far. All pretty much accurate. However, Gary did lead team in pressures sunday and we didn't trade up for him...but Burns or Sweat in a trade back would have been better. However, at the end of the day, results matter and we are now 14-3 in the last 17 regular season games.

          The only thing I disagree with you on is your continued mantra that we need to squander more resources at WR when our offense is plenty good to win an Owl.
          “IF” the Packers made the “Right Moves” and built a top 5 defense I would agree with you that “They Would Have Enough On Offense” with AR12 playing at an Elite level.

          However, I don’t believe this defense is anywhere near top 5.

          “No Tickey No Watchy”

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by GB-Brandon View Post
            “IF” the Packers made the “Right Moves” and built a top 5 defense I would agree with you that “They Would Have Enough On Offense” with AR12 playing at an Elite level.

            However, I don’t believe this defense is anywhere near top 5.
            Then they won't win an Owl. We have seen Rodgers with a top 5 D win an Owl. We have seen Rodgers break a ton of passing records and fall short...more than once.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #21
              Remember when Arod went into soldier field and lit the bears up in the NFCC to propel us to the Owl...me either.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #22
                Nobody is taking about it and probably because it’s only one week but need to keep an eye on Preston Smith. I have friends who live in DC and are die hard skins fans and I’ve heard things about him not showing up for extended periods of time. Something to keep an eye on.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                  Remember when Arod went into soldier field and lit the bears up in the NFCC to propel us to the Owl...me either.
                  With the No.1 ranked defense in the NFL.

                  We don’t have that type of defense right now. Not even close!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post

                    Just wanted to feel the power between my legs....YEE HAW!!!
                    +1000, Bobble

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KYPack View Post
                      Of the four score or so that have been "Patlerized" in the past, you do have one distinction. (But not the one your think you have)

                      You are the only dumb bastard that Patler has shredded, but still doesn't understand what he meant.

                      Tank not only tries to beat a dead horse, he's so goofy that he tries to ride it!

                      Tank has been........ KYed.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post

                        Just wanted to feel the power between my legs....YEE HAW!!!
                        Skinny pants made with stretchy/flexible fabrics, something like the pair the chick appears to be wearing, has gotta be the merchants’ greatest innovation since the invention of the wheel.

                        Biology didn’t bless me with a 6’4” muscular body, so I don’t always look good in said skinny, stretchy pants (or jeans). But they’re pretty comfortable while flipping burgers, which requires a tons of walking and bending. Plus, I no longer have to change into workout cloths after clocking out. Can immediately hit the course and comfortably play a round of disc golf.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                          Oh mother of irony, Crumby has been SHAMROCKED!

                          (Fact: At the birth of this site, ole Patler went by the name “ShamrockFan69.”)

                          I remain the only one who has never been “Patlerized” or “Shamrocked.” Back in them glorious JSO days, Patler arrogantly argued that it was impossible for the Packers to retain Wahle, Rivera and D-Sharp. Patler was “tanked” after I flawlessly - with math - debunked his argument.
                          ...and once again, you are wrong.

                          I have never gone by the name "ShamrockFan69".
                          Last edited by Patler; 09-19-2020, 04:07 PM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X