Reports are coming out that there's at least 1 offer to JJ for 16-18 million. If THAT's what it takes, no thanks. We have way too many more fish to fry than to tie that much up when we're already so strapped on the cap.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JJ Watt being released
Collapse
X
-
This is what I expected, i was thinking something like ZOriginally posted by SudsMcBucky View PostReports are coming out that there's at least 1 offer to JJ for 16-18 million. If THAT's what it takes, no thanks. We have way too many more fish to fry than to tie that much up when we're already so strapped on the cap.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
-
I love how y’all are like, if Watt wants $18 M, then fuck him and everything Aryan about him, as if y’all gonna fork the bill.Originally posted by SudsMcBucky View PostReports are coming out that there's at least 1 offer to JJ for 16-18 million. If THAT's what it takes, no thanks. We have way too many more fish to fry than to tie that much up when we're already so strapped on the cap.
Nigga, please! The cap always be cooked. In an era in which the Networks pay billions to the NFL for the right to expose us to corporate ads on any given Sunday, Monday and Thursday, the NFL salary cap merely serves one, and only one, purpose: it gives the pig owners an excuse cut labor expenses.
The Packers have over $400 M sitting in a foreign bank earning interests faster than the speed of fuck. Packer owners are a bunch of irrelevant folks holding unprofitable “stocks,” and therefore they don’t pocket any of the profits the Packers make. And it ain’t like the next time the Packers want a shinny new arena, they’re gonna milk their saving to pay for it.
Sure, that asshole, Father Time, eventually - and mercilessly - deteriorate every jock’s Kung Fu. But Father Time is still 2 paces behind Watt. Watt’s still a legitimate push rusher. He’s still an extraordinary run stopper. He still can tip passes like Dikembe Mutombo used to block basketballs. And Watt can still play TE.
The Packers certainly have the frogskins pay to Watt. And they should.Last edited by Guest; 02-25-2021, 01:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View PostI love how y’all are like, if Watt wants $18 M, then fuck him and everything Aryan about him, as if y’all gonna fork the bill.
Nigga, please! The cap always be cooked. In an era in which the Networks pay billions to the NFL for the right to expose us to corporate ads on any given Sunday, Monday and Thursday, the NFL salary cap merely serves one, and only one, purpose: it gives the pig owners an excuse cut labor expenses.
The Packers have over $400 M sitting in a foreign bank earning interests faster than the speed of fuck. Packer owners are a bunch of irrelevant folks holding unprofitable “stocks,” and therefore they don’t pocket any of the profits the Packers make. And it ain’t like the next time the Packers want a shinny new arena, they’re gonna milk their saving to pay for it.
Sure, that asshole, Father Time, eventually - and mercilessly - deteriorate every jock’s Kung Fu. But Father Time is still 2 paces behind Watt. Watt’s still a legitimate push rusher. He’s still an extraordinary run stopper. He still can tip passes like Dikembe Mutombo used to block basketballs. And Watt can still play TE.
The Packers certainly have the frogskins pay Watt. And they should.
Whoever pays JJ Watt 16 - 18 million is a fool. Watt will have to be babied, thus meaning fewer snaps, and he's already a ghost of the player he was. It's not like he's going to regain his old form."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
Hopefully those reports are just a bogus leak by Watt's agent to get potential suitors to increase their offers. Agree Packers shouldn't pay that much.Originally posted by Fritz View PostWhoever pays JJ Watt 16 - 18 million is a fool. Watt will have to be babied, thus meaning fewer snaps, and he's already a ghost of the player he was. It's not like he's going to regain his old form.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
Babied? Watt played 16 games last season without being babied.Originally posted by Fritz View PostWhoever pays JJ Watt 16 - 18 million is a fool. Watt will have to be babied, thus meaning fewer snaps, and he's already a ghost of the player he was. It's not like he's going to regain his old form.
Last I checked, Watt didn’t play RB. Age 32 ain’t age 22, but plenty of hotshot defensive linemen remained effective well into their 30’s. Sacks don’t always tell the whole story, but 92 had 16 sacks at 37. Strahan, 18.5 at 32. Bruce Smith played til he was 60 or something without ever being babied.
Father Time likely won’t catch up to Watt til 2026.
Comment
-
The Packers didn’t blink twice when they opted to pay Cletidus Clark that much. Clark ain’t the legitimate pass rusher nor the extraordinary run stopper Watt has been. Ain’t even close.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostHopefully those reports are just a bogus leak by Watt's agent to get potential suitors to increase their offers. Agree Packers shouldn't pay that much.
Comment
-
Well, but they DID give Clark that much, and they DID give Bakh that much, and they WILL give Adams that much. There's only so much to go around. Maybe they can make it work if the guaranteed money isn't too much. But I doubt it.Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View PostThe Packers didn’t blink twice when they opted to pay Cletidus Clark that much. Clark ain’t the legitimate pass rusher nor the extraordinary run stopper Watt has been. Ain’t even close.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
I have Tank blocked, but ask who signed that Hunt contract from the GM side.Originally posted by Joemailman View PostWell, but they DID give Clark that much, and they DID give Bakh that much, and they WILL give Adams that much. There's only so much to go around. Maybe they can make it work if the guaranteed money isn't too much. But I doubt it.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
Wasn't the wreck of a GM during that time frame Sherman? If so would make sense. That contract and the Joe Johnson signing still leave a bad taste in my mouth.Originally posted by Zool View PostI have Tank blocked, but ask who signed that Hunt contract from the GM side.60% of the time it works every time.
Comment
-
How about "Kneeless" LaVar Arrington?Originally posted by Spaulding View PostWasn't the wreck of a GM during that time frame Sherman? If so would make sense. That contract and the Joe Johnson signing still leave a bad taste in my mouth.Originally posted by 3irty1This is museum quality stupidity.
Comment
-
How about trading up to grab a punter who couldn't get off the bench and we carried two punters on the roster that year?Originally posted by Spaulding View PostWasn't the wreck of a GM during that time frame Sherman? If so would make sense. That contract and the Joe Johnson signing still leave a bad taste in my mouth.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
time caught up to watt in 2016 already.Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View PostBabied? Watt played 16 games last season without being babied.
Last I checked, Watt didn’t play RB. Age 32 ain’t age 22, but plenty of hotshot defensive linemen remained effective well into their 30’s. Sacks don’t always tell the whole story, but 92 had 16 sacks at 37. Strahan, 18.5 at 32. Bruce Smith played til he was 60 or something without ever being babied.
Father Time likely won’t catch up to Watt til 2026.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment

Comment