Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AR wants out?!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SI Trade Idea:

    AR and a 2022 4th

    Broncos:

    QB Lock
    DE Chubb
    G Risner
    2022 1st and 2nd
    2023 1st
    2024 1st

    I would do this in a heartbeat
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

    Comment


    • Drew Lock was one of the NFL's worst starting QB's last year. He is Denver's mistake. Keep it that way. I'd rather have one of heir good young receivers.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
        Drew Lock was one of the NFL's worst starting QB's last year. He is Denver's mistake. Keep it that way. I'd rather have one of heir good young receivers.
        I have no problem taking Lock. Lock, Love, Bortles is a good room. Cut him later if needed.
        Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
          SI Trade Idea:

          AR and a 2022 4th

          Broncos:

          QB Lock
          DE Chubb
          G Risner
          2022 1st and 2nd
          2023 1st
          2024 1st

          I would do this in a heartbeat
          No way they'd do that. That's the equivalent of four 1sts and three 2nd's for Rodgers and a 4th. That would be highway robbery but if they were that crazy I agree - pull the trigger no matter how great Rodgers is.
          60% of the time it works every time.

          Comment


          • What about Carr + 3 1sts + 1 2nd?
            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
              I have no problem taking Lock. Lock, Love, Bortles is a good room. Cut him later if needed.
              I wish they would do it, just so we could play with these names.

              Lock Loves Bortles?

              Bortles Loves Lock?

              Love Bortles Lock?

              Lock Bortles Love?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                What about Carr + 3 1sts + 1 2nd?
                Nope, need to add a defensive starter.
                Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                  What about Carr + 3 1sts + 1 2nd?
                  I really wonder whether Aaron Rodgers would want to go to a team that would have to give up so much draft capital in order to acquire him. And that matters because no team is going to give up that much for an Aaron Rodgers that doesn't want to play there.
                  I can't run no more
                  With that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places
                  Say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                  A thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Tony Oday View Post
                    SI Trade Idea:

                    AR and a 2022 4th

                    Broncos:

                    QB Lock
                    DE Chubb
                    G Risner
                    2022 1st and 2nd
                    2023 1st
                    2024 1st

                    I would do this in a heartbeat
                    Absolutely I would do this. I would do this deal minus the 2024 1st round pick. Lock is a throw in, but Chubb is a very good young pass rusher (equiv to a 1st) and Risner is a strong OL prospect (equiv to a 2nd).

                    I highly doubt Denver would offer up that good of a deal, but that is probably what it would take for Green Bay to make a trade.
                    It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                    Comment


                    • I agree, those trade ideas would be fair if not better than fair, but even so, the Packers would be a shitty team for a few years and a mediocre team after that for quite a while.
                      What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
                        Man, media types really don't think he is coming back. Probably for the ratings but still. One would think there would be some clarity of this by this point.
                        I'm starting to wonder if this situation has nothing to do with anything the Packers organization did. Rodgers is engaged. He is from California. His fiancee is from California. She is an actress. Jeopardy is filmed in California. Spending more than half his time in Green Bay Wisconsin might simply not fit into his life right now. All the trade talk has been about him being traded out west. Denver. Oakland. On draft day San Francisco. Earlier the Rams called to inquire about his availability. So Rodgers is trying to force a trade out west. I suspect he may be telling the Packers he wants a trade out west or he will retire. Most may scoff at the prospect of retirement, but Rodgers is a different kind of dude.
                        I can't run no more
                        With that lawless crowd
                        While the killers in high places
                        Say their prayers out loud
                        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                        A thundercloud
                        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                        Comment


                        • And I read that his fiancé lives in Denver.
                          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                            I'm starting to wonder if this situation has nothing to do with anything the Packers organization did. Rodgers is engaged. He is from California. His fiancee is from California. She is an actress. Jeopardy is filmed in California. Spending more than half his time in Green Bay Wisconsin might simply not fit into his life right now. All the trade talk has been about him being traded out west. Denver. Oakland. On draft day San Francisco. Earlier the Rams called to inquire about his availability. So Rodgers is trying to force a trade out west. I suspect he may be telling the Packers he wants a trade out west or he will retire. Most may scoff at the prospect of retirement, but Rodgers is a different kind of dude.
                            Know any Hollywood producer? My screenplay, “The Great Arm of Butte,” is finished. Shailene Woodley would be perfect for the role of Yoko Ono.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                              As I said when CMI basically said what you said, tough shit. It's not the Packers' mission to make Jordan Love happy. There's a helluva lot worse things than getting paid over $1 million to hold the proverbial clipboard. (pertaining to your post two above - you replied so quick that you slipped the other post in hahahaha)
                              Yeah, this makes sense from your perspective but any player with a brain will view this as doing a disservice to the player. 1M to hold a clipboard and NOT let the player pursue his career is not doing right by the players. 1M is not very much money to these players, in fact it is a very low salary for an NFL player - especially when half the QBs get 25M+ annually. Compound that over a less glamorous second contract due to lack of playing time, etc and it's abundantly clear this is a hostile act if it went that way.

                              The Packers would never do that. Penny smart, pound foolish.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                                I agree, those trade ideas would be fair if not better than fair, but even so, the Packers would be a shitty team for a few years and a mediocre team after that for quite a while.
                                Why? The amount of talent on this roster is better then average, even without Rodgers. True, they aren't a title contender right now without Rodgers...but with a halfway capable QB they are a playoff contender.

                                Hell... The fucking Bears with a dumbass coach and weaker overall roster won 8 games last year. Losing Rodgers and getting two starting caliber players in return would not make the Packers shitty.
                                It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X