Originally posted by RashanGary
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Packers vs. Chiefs Discussion Thread
Collapse
X
-
I was trying to remember the last time I was negative about the Packers winning. Probably pre-Favre era hahahaha. Literally, all those years, the Packers had a good shot at beating anybody - pretty much every loss was somehow a fluke.Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View PostWait, did I read this right? Tex, the eternal homer, the eternal optimist, predicts a Packer loss? We’re all going to hell cos Tex ain’t ever predicted a Packer loss til now. Hell, I still remember the day Scott Fucking Tolizen started at QB for the Pack. You, Tex, said Packers would win (actually ended in a draw, and Noodle-Arm Flynn ended up replacing an ineffective Tolizen).
It’s b/c Love’s black and/or Asian, ain’t it, Tex?
I've got nothing against Love because he's black (and I haven't heard anybody but you say he might be Asian). I really have nothing against him at all with one huge exception: I absolutely want Rodgers as the Packers QB for more years than a lot of people think he can play. It's long term mediocrity when he's gone. That's what is important. Any quality play by Love could jeopardize Rodgers staying. That trumps losing one game or the prospect of getting a better draft pick in trade for Love.
That "national disgust with Rodgers" is downright idiotic. Even more idiotic is the idea that somebody who claims to be a Packer fan WANTS the Packers to unload Rodgers.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Curious. Did you actually listen to him or just more shame and mocking?Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostHe filled out the full anti-vaxx bingo card.
The 17% of America that respects taking bizarre alternatives to medical science as "free thought, my body my choice" are thrilled.
Overall, it's all a punch in the gut for the Packers brand.
He said he’s allergic to something in P and M and that JnJ wasn’t available when he started looking into it. Even if he got JnJ 6mo ago - it’s like 30% effective today.
Would you rather him have gotten JnJ and every 2 week testing vs masked up, daily testing, etc.
Or are you just self shaming for your virtue signaling bs while seeing plenty of vaxd players catch (and probably spread) covid? Or were you worried about his hospitalization and death rate (as that’s mostly what these vax prevent)?The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
I expect he's lying again. But doesn't matter. Every word out of his mouth has been anti-vaxx garbage or deception.Originally posted by Fosco33 View PostHe said he’s allergic to something in P and M
??? Rodgers wasn't eligible for Johnson until many doses had gone out. Rodgers said the Johnson week-long pause eliminated it as a choice for him because it proved.... some false garbage. The fact is the Johnson was paused one week due to a condition that affected 5 younger women nationally. The pause was to do a statistical analysis to see that problem wasn't more extensive. That's prudence and good science.Originally posted by Fosco33 View Postand that JnJ wasn’t available when he started looking into it. Even if he got JnJ 6mo ago - it’s like 30% effective today.
You're repeating the same false information that echos across the antivaxx world. The vaccine is reducing spread, easily demonstrated.Originally posted by Fosco33 View Postwhile seeing plenty of vaxd players catch (and probably spread) covid? Or were you worried about his hospitalization and death rate (as that’s mostly what these vax prevent)?
It's disappointing that vaxxed ppl can still host lots of virus. The anti-vaxxers have used this narrow truth to claim that vax is useless in containing the virus. Rodgers repeated that crap along with many other anti-vaxx falsehoods. In fact vaccinated folks get infected far less often and are infectious for a briefer period.
Comment
-
The pejorative ‘anti vax’ is funny. I’ve been vaxd along w/ everyone I know.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostI expect he's lying again. But doesn't matter. Every word out of his mouth has been anti-vaxx garbage or deception.
??? Rodgers wasn't eligible for Johnson until many doses had gone out. Rodgers said the Johnson week-long pause eliminated it as a choice for him because it proved.... some false garbage. The fact is the Johnson was paused one week due to a condition that affected 5 younger women nationally. The pause was to do a statistical analysis to see that problem wasn't more extensive. That's prudence and good science.
You're repeating the same false information that echos across the antivaxx world. The vaccine is reducing spread, easily demonstrated.
It's disappointing that vaxxed ppl can still host lots of virus. The anti-vaxxers have used this narrow truth to claim that vax is useless in containing the virus. Rodgers repeated that crap along with many other anti-vaxx falsehoods. In fact vaccinated folks get infected far less often and are infectious for a briefer period.
You saying it’s false doesn’t make it so. Israel v UK v Florida.
Go over to FYIThe measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
You can cite all the studies in the world saying the vax is effective but in the real world when we see vaxed getting covid, we know it’s not very effective just by using the old power of observation.Last edited by RashanGary; 11-06-2021, 01:40 PM.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
You also posted that covid is no biggie because we don't see people dropping dead in the streets. More of that power of observation, gut-feeling wisdom.Originally posted by RashanGary View PostYou can site all the studies in the world saying the vax is effective but in the real world when we see vaxed getting covid, we know it’s not very effective just by using the old power of observation.
I can't deny that this is how many people navigate the complexity of the world - and to varying degrees all of us do so.
Comment
-
I got new glasses a few months ago. One of the ladies was telling me it’s so frustrating when she’s trying to fit a person with glasses and they say, “you’re the expert.” She said, “no, we’re talking about how these glasses fit on your face. You’re the expert.”Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Postfalse readings of those data/studies.
I'll defer to experts who survey ALL of the studies and know how to weigh them. Debates online between biased amateurs never get anywhere.
The moral of the story is that people are trained to trust experts so much that they can’t see the most obvious of things.
Just open your eyes, HH. This science isn’t matching reality.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Packers will win if we can win the ToP, turnover battle and run it effectively.
I’m thinking 24-20 pack (sticking w/ 24 pts as of late).The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
MVS activated.
Love goes in with Adams, Lazard, MVS and Jones/Dillon. He should have every opportunity to win this game. If the Chiefs load up and dare Love to beat them, hopefully he makes a couple big plays and knocks them out of that mentality.
Our OL is suspect though. Rodgers was able to avoid having it spiral downward. I don’t think Love has the experience or savvy to make die with a poor OL.
I’m giving this game a coin flips chance.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Cumby going to predict in the Gameday Thread a total meltdown by Love? The suspense is killing me.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment
-
I see this as similar to the Arizona game. If Packers can run the ball effectively, they can win.Originally posted by RashanGary View PostMVS activated.
Love goes in with Adams, Lazard, MVS and Jones/Dillon. He should have every opportunity to win this game. If the Chiefs load up and dare Love to beat them, hopefully he makes a couple big plays and knocks them out of that mentality.
Our OL is suspect though. Rodgers was able to avoid having it spiral downward. I don’t think Love has the experience or savvy to make die with a poor OL.
I’m giving this game a coin flips chance.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment

Comment