Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Matthew Staffords HOF chances

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Matthew Staffords HOF chances

    He's 34 years old.

    49,995 yards
    323 Touchdowns
    161 Interceptions

    If he plays 7 more years. That puts him at age 40 as his last good year in the NFL, and he averages 4,000 yards, 28 touchdowns and 10 interceptions he'd finish with

    78,000 yards
    519 touchdowns
    231 interceptions

    He would finish 3rd in yards, 4th in touchdown passes and similar to Brees and Manning in interceptions.

    He's got a shot next year to have a better year than he had this year with the Rams. He could easily make a run for MVP.

    I think he's an MVP away from locking up his HOF spot. Even without the MVP, one more super bowl would do it too.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    If he was on a better team for most of his career I think he'd already be in the conversation and have probably won an MVP.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think he will make the HOF. The 17th game will wind up helping him.
      It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

      Comment


      • #4
        The only way he makes HOF is if he wins another super bowl. I just don't see him as a HOFer. Hall of very good, maybe.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
          The only way he makes HOF is if he wins another super bowl. I just don't see him as a HOFer. Hall of very good, maybe.
          I would disagree, The HOF committee must look at just talent, not just if you were lucky enough to be on a talented team. Stafford was an excellent QB on a shitty team..

          Comment


          • #6
            Is Stafford much better than David Carr?
            Stafford vs Matt Ryan in their primes who do you take?

            I think I would pick Carr and Ryan over stafford, but even if you disagree with me show me there is a large gap between them that shows Stafford is substantial better.

            Until then hall of very good.

            Or to extended it to be the 2004 draft, I would pick rapiestburger over stafford, likely rivers over Stafford and finally Stafford over Eli.

            Still hall of very good imo.
            All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

            George Orwell

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
              He's 34 years old.

              49,995 yards
              323 Touchdowns
              161 Interceptions

              If he plays 7 more years. That puts him at age 40 as his last good year in the NFL, and he averages 4,000 yards, 28 touchdowns and 10 interceptions he'd finish with

              78,000 yards
              519 touchdowns
              231 interceptions

              He would finish 3rd in yards, 4th in touchdown passes and similar to Brees and Manning in interceptions.

              He's got a shot next year to have a better year than he had this year with the Rams. He could easily make a run for MVP.

              I think he's an MVP away from locking up his HOF spot. Even without the MVP, one more super bowl would do it too.
              Rams have traded and leveraged the future for this ring. Honestly they will regress each of the next 5 seasons. Stafford probably shouldn't make the hall for this reason. How many years have you said to yourself "ya know, stafford is a top 5 QB in the NFL this year". I don't think I ever have....much less consistently said so.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #8
                Top 5 QB this season:

                Rodgers, Brady, Burrow, Maholmes, Allen? I think almost everyone would agree on Rodgers, Brady, Maholmes. Maybe you could make an argument for Stafford sneaking in, but he threw a bunch of pick 6s for a stretch. Even threw 2 picks in the Owl. Threw another one in NFCC.

                Just can't see him making it without like 5 more stellar years and maybe another ring.
                The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by oldbutnotdeadyet View Post
                  I would disagree, The HOF committee must look at just talent, not just if you were lucky enough to be on a talented team. Stafford was an excellent QB on a shitty team..
                  I would say the numbers don't support that. I personally think he is very talented, but he makes a lot of mistakes too. A poor man's Brett Favre. Matt Stafford is Phil Rivers. Good player, never elite. Amazing in fantasy football lol. But never once was he a top 3-4 QB in the league. Not a single season. Longevity is great but I don't just don't see a HOF guy there. No all-pro, no all-decade, a single pro-bowl, etc.
                  Last edited by call_me_ishmael; 02-25-2022, 01:50 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We always pitch numbers, which I suppose we must, when it comes to HOF discussions. But not only has the number of games changed - what would Bart Starr's or Johnny Unitas's or Joe Namath's numbers been with seventeen regular-season games? - but the rules and conditions have changed. No domes to play in come December. Quarterbacks back then being not just sacked but ravaged. A vicious helmet-to-helmet hit, and the reaction was "Ohh, what a hit!" Imagine the numbers Starr or Unitas or Namath or Y.A. Tittle could've piled up if they knew that they could only be tackled from the shoulders down, and that they couldn't be roughed up, really. Thus, a quarterback's shelf life back then was shorter, much shorter. How could it not be? So again, you couldnt pile up the numbers back then. How long do you think Tom Brady would have been able to play if he'd been playing under the rules of, say, 1970? I doubt that Aaron Rodgers would have played past 35. Then there were the rules that allowed defensive backs to make savage hits, so receivers weren't able to stretch out and grab a ball without getting slammed and dropping it. Oh, and DB's could famously use stickem back then. Lots of the almost-interceptions that, say, Brett Favre threw would have stuck to Lester Hayes's hands if Favre had played in the 70's. And Favre still played under tougher rules as far as hitting the QB than Aaron Rodgers does now.

                    So it's really hard to gauge. I think Matt Stafford is a good quarterback - certainly the best one I've ever seen under center for the Detroit Lions, and I go back to the days of them shuttling Bill Munson and Greg Landry back-and-forth. That's a lot of QB's. Admittedly, the Lions' QB's sucked, but Stafford was still the best of the bunch. But HOF? I don't think so, no. As others mentioned, the dude threw two picks in the SB.
                    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                    KYPack

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Big Ben will be a HOF QB. Stafford can EASILY eclipse a lot of his stat levels. Voters will absolutely take into account that he played so long for an inept franchise like the Lions.

                      As long as Stafford remains in the top 2-3 QBs in the NFC over the next 4 seasons, he has a strong chance to make the HOF. He's certainly not in there now...and I don't believe that is the question at hand. We are talking about after all is said and done.
                      It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        BTW

                        Stafford was #4 in QBR rating this past season. He absolutely was a top 5 QB last season. He threw for almost 5,000 yards and 41 TDs.

                        And won a title.
                        It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I want to see him next year on the same team in the same offense. He could be even better. Even MVP better.

                          I would like to see him win MVP and then finish his career strong. He would get in then.
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by King Friday View Post
                            Big Ben will be a HOF QB. Stafford can EASILY eclipse a lot of his stat levels. Voters will absolutely take into account that he played so long for an inept franchise like the Lions.

                            As long as Stafford remains in the top 2-3 QBs in the NFC over the next 4 seasons, he has a strong chance to make the HOF. He's certainly not in there now...and I don't believe that is the question at hand. We are talking about after all is said and done.
                            Numbers aren't everything. Big Ben won 2 super bowls, went to 3. He never had a losing season, Stafford has had, what, 2 or 3 winning seasons? Big Ben is fringe IMO though because I'm not sure he was ever top 2 or 3 at his position. I don't really view him that different than Phil Rivers either if not for the super bowls.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If a QB wins 2 he is in the Hall.
                              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X