Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Packers vs. Bills Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
    Rodgers leads the NFC in passing touchdowns. On pace for 25.
    No way. pathetic. Anyways, I expect Jeudy or Claypool to suit up in green and gold before Sunday. Gute needs to do something to get help on offense: he completely failed the off season. Time for him to try to save face at least.

    Comment


    • #17
      Packers lose by at least 20 in this game I'm afraid, weak offense with no receivers doesn't get better. There is no scheme to fix no talent (be it young or just shitty). This is the week that the wheels officially fall off. Well at least we will get a decent pick in the draft.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
        I am definitely putting frogskins on the Packers. How much depends on how I do at the poker tables.
        I do like the contrarian play. If Erin is as fragile and easily butt hurt as people contend I would expect his best game of the year.
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Sparkey View Post
          43 - 10 Bills ( Normal weather )
          27 - 3 Bills ( Bad, windy, rainy weather )

          Better QB - Bills
          Better Offense - Bills
          Better Defense - Bills
          Better Special Teams - Bills

          or lets look at this another way:
          ( Josh Allen and Stefan Diggs vs The GB Defense )
          ( Aaron Rodgers and Sammy Watkins vs The Bills Defense )

          It will be ugly!!!
          Hard to really argue with this take. Bills are better at every position basically. However I would argue that the POTENTIAL is closer to the packers being about equal. For my money, the Bills are the most talented roster in the league. Packers would be top 5 if the OL were healthy and gelling. IF Bak and Jenkins were to return to form they are 6 deep in very good players. If Bak sits and Jenkins is sub par...well, that is the best 2 of the group so clearly it changes the equation.
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Freak Out View Post
            The OL played pretty well overall considering the front 4 they were facing.
            It was close to their best performance of the year which is encouraging...but the run blocking wasn't where it needs to be. It is near impossible to run at Sweat though, and Tom didn't run block particularly well.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Jaire View Post
              No way. pathetic. Anyways, I expect Jeudy or Claypool to suit up in green and gold before Sunday. Gute needs to do something to get help on offense: he completely failed the off season. Time for him to try to save face at least.
              Jeudy is way too expensive. Pitt is flush with good WR and they are rebuilding. If claypool could be had for a 3rd I would trade it. Otherwise we will fuck it up like we do every 3rd round pick.

              Imagine a future of 6'4" superfreak athletes Claypool and Watson lining up with 6'2" Romeo. That could terrify defenses in the future.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #22
                We only have two starters from the second round since Adams. We have become the teams I used to make fun of, saying they are better off trading their picks for proven players with a path. We should not be drafting in the second or third rounds. period.

                Maybe Gute can make his living off trades, FA, guys off the street, and UDFA's.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                  Jeudy is way too expensive. Pitt is flush with good WR and they are rebuilding. If claypool could be had for a 3rd I would trade it. Otherwise we will fuck it up like we do every 3rd round pick.

                  Imagine a future of 6'4" superfreak athletes Claypool and Watson lining up with 6'2" Romeo. That could terrify defenses in the future.


                  CLAYPOOL is the guy to get near term, and I'd also give up a 3rd. Pickens is their future. They are not going to resign Claypool after he expires. He might be the one WR who makes sense.

                  Alex Pierce, and Pickens look pretty good this year.
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                    Jeudy is way too expensive. Pitt is flush with good WR and they are rebuilding. If claypool could be had for a 3rd I would trade it. Otherwise we will fuck it up like we do every 3rd round pick.

                    Imagine a future of 6'4" superfreak athletes Claypool and Watson lining up with 6'2" Romeo. That could terrify defenses in the future.
                    I've generally been against drafting WRs early or trading for them as well as against signing old retread FAs. I'm coming around to modifying that point of view, though. Yeah, getting Claypool for a 3rd would be a good thing, both for the present and the future, although retaining him after 2023 might get expensive if he proves to be good.
                    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                      CLAYPOOL is the guy to get near term, and I'd also give up a 3rd. Pickens is their future. They are not going to resign Claypool after he expires. He might be the one WR who makes sense.

                      Alex Pierce, and Pickens look pretty good this year.
                      I'd be okay with giving up a 3rd for Claypool since he's only in the 3rd year of his contract. He would only count 2.1M against the cap next year. If the Packers can right the ship and get to 5-5, a better idea might be to go after OBJ in a few weeks. He played in a similar offense with the Rams last year and could pick things up pretty quickly.
                      I can't run no more
                      With that lawless crowd
                      While the killers in high places
                      Say their prayers out loud
                      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                      A thundercloud
                      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                        I'd be okay with giving up a 3rd for Claypool since he's only in the 3rd year of his contract. He would only count 2.1M against the cap next year. If the Packers can right the ship and get to 5-5, a better idea might be to go after OBJ in a few weeks. He played in a similar offense with the Rams last year and could pick things up pretty quickly.
                        I wonder how good OBJ will be coming back from his second ACL. I'm not convinced he'd be worth near what he thinks he'd be worth.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Man…he may as well give up a 3rd…Gute sucks in the 3rd. Claypool could have a huge impact almost immediately. Who else is shopping their receivers?
                          C.H.U.D.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Freak Out View Post
                            Man…he may as well give up a 3rd…Gute sucks in the 3rd. Claypool could have a huge impact almost immediately. Who else is shopping their receivers?
                            Given Packers recent draft history, I'd give up a 3rd for Claypool. But there's no way I'd give up a 4th.
                            I can't run no more
                            With that lawless crowd
                            While the killers in high places
                            Say their prayers out loud
                            But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                            A thundercloud
                            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                              Given Packers recent draft history, I'd give up a 3rd for Claypool. But there's no way I'd give up a 4th.


                              GIVEN all of GUTE's shitty 3rd round picks can we just trade them all away ?
                              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                                GIVEN all of GUTE's shitty 3rd round picks can we just trade them all away ?
                                Right now, the way I see it, Gute is cutting most his seconds, thirds, fourths, fifths, sixths, and sevenths early. I'm not disagreeing with him either.

                                The FA part of the GM job seems to be his forte and he's good with the firsts. So, let's just let her rip, and get it going. This train is a runnaway anywho.

                                Don't let San Fran beat you in the futures give away.

                                the future is now..............................and it means the FO will get cleaned out sooner than later.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X