Remember when..

[kcpackman]

Remember when I said they needed to let Rodgers go last year after the "hero ball" and you all called me a troll and ran me off? Yep am back and I am trolling you all with the truth gain.

[kcpackman]

But dont worry - I wont read any of your idiotic responses. Fuck off all of you!

[MadtownPacker]

!! Why would they call you a troll?

[George Cumby]

Remember when I said they needed to let Rodgers go last year after the "hero ball" and you all called me a troll and ran me off? Yep am back and I am trolling you all with the truth gain.

Uhhhhh.

WTF you talking about?

A bunch of us have wanted to cut bait with him.

[red]

now thats how to show up after a year of lurking and drop the mic

[Teamcheez1]

I think at least half this forum were on the side of trading Rodgers instead of giving him the big contract.

[Bretsky]

I think at least half this forum were on the side of trading Rodgers instead of giving him the big contract.

Most might admit that half was right at this point

[Joemailman]

There was a thread with a poll. Result was 75% wanted Rodgers traded. I was actually one of the 25% who wanted him signed. But I never imagined the new contract would be so Rodgers-friendly, in terms of how difficult it was for the Packers to get out of it, if need be. Guess I didn't think that through. I did not like the contract once I realized the implications of it. I'm not sure if anyone other than Tex did.

[texaspackerbacker]

As I said clearly then, and I stand by now, I was and am all for the contract BECAUSE it solidified Rodgers staying in Green Bay - which is the key to winning football for the Packers.

[King Friday]

As I said clearly then, and I stand by now, I was and am all for the contract BECAUSE it solidified Rodgers staying in Green Bay - which is the key to winning football for the Packers.

8-9 is winning?

Goff was 9-8. At this point, Rodgers doesn’t ensure anything but hallucinogens.

[Bretsky]

There was a thread with a poll. Result was 75% wanted Rodgers traded. I was actually one of the 25% who wanted him signed. But I never imagined the new contract would be so Rodgers-friendly, in terms of how difficult it was for the Packers to get out of it, if need be. Guess I didn't think that through. I did not like the contract once I realized the implications of it. I'm not sure if anyone other than Tex did.

Gutebag really let Rodgers make him his b@tch with that contract.
I think once Adams left (which imo was partially due to all of the Rodgers drama and not giving Devante love the year before) I think Sharon decided it was my way or the highway

[RashanGary]

There was a thread with a poll. Result was 75% wanted Rodgers traded. I was actually one of the 25% who wanted him signed. But I never imagined the new contract would be so Rodgers-friendly, in terms of how difficult it was for the Packers to get out of it, if need be. Guess I didn't think that through. I did not like the contract once I realized the implications of it. I'm not sure if anyone other than Tex did.

This was me too. Once I saw that deal I was like, oh shit!

[bobblehead]

Hey JH- at least i have the decency to bump my post when I want to make sure everyone knows how smart I am.

[RashanGary]

Hey JH- at least i have the decency to bump my post when I want to make sure everyone knows how smart I am.

If having all my opinions saved on packerrats has taught me anything, it’s that I’m not as smart as I thought I was. Harvey, Nutz, you with OL, KY and others got me beat. No need for me to try to prove how smart I am. It wouldn’t fool anyone.

[Tony Oday]

Eh AR will run it back next year to the Super Bowl.