Who Will Aaron Rodgers Play For In 2023 (Or Will He Play)?

[Bretsky]

It sure sounds like Rodgers bailed on Green Bay per Gute's quotes.

"Via Matt Schneidman of TheAthletic.com, G.M. Brian Gutekunst told reporters at the league meeting in Arizona that the team tried to contact Aaron Rodgers “many times” during the offseason to discuss how he fits in the team’s future. Rodgers, according to Gutekunst, never responded."

“Our inability to reach him or for him to respond in any way,” Gutekunst said. “I think at that point we just kind of had to — I had to do my job and reach out and understanding that a trade could be possible.”

And that's not even brining up how the Flower and Karen were having weekely meeting so Sharon could be more involved in the game plan.........that is..........WHEN he decided to show up.....which was sometimes from sounds of it

[texaspackerbacker]

Tex, you are the poster child for hope.

Yeah, except my idea of HOPE is the opposite of ya'all. I'm hoping for a continuation of greatness and winning football, while ya'all are craving doom and misery of losing football.

I saw some article were some media puke tried to bait LaFleur into saying something bad about Rodgers, but LaFleur wouldn't fall for it. Even though I absolutely detest those media shitheads, I still read pretty much every article I can find about this whole mess. The difference, though, is unlike most of ya'all in here, I don't just automatically swallow their shit like its gospel.

[sharpe1027]

Yeah, except my idea of HOPE is the opposite of ya'all. I'm hoping for a continuation of greatness and winning football, while ya'all are craving doom and misery of losing football.

I saw some article were some media puke tried to bait LaFleur into saying something bad about Rodgers, but LaFleur wouldn't fall for it. Even though I absolutely detest those media shitheads, I still read pretty much every article I can find about this whole mess. The difference, though, is unlike most of ya'all in here, I don't just automatically swallow their shit like its gospel.

Reading all the media pukes articles gives them them clicks that keep them creating more of the content you hate. You must really crave more of terrible media shitheads. You're part of the problem.

P.S., there isn't a single Packer fan here that craves losing football. You keep making misleading, opinion, over-the-top statements like that. You sound like the clickbait headlines from the media pukes. You're a lot like them, stirring the pot with statements of your personal opinion stated as fact. A real shithead.

[run pMc]

I have no idea who the specific media pukes are, they aren't called out by name. I know there's a lot of stuff out there that isn't fact based, I'm wary of that. There's a difference between a news story and an editorial or opinion piece.
What's been reported by numerous media sources with journalist standards is that this is highly likely to happen, and soon. Really the only questions left are when it happens and for what compensation.
It must be nice to call people names and saying things are fake because you disagree. it'd be kind of cute if it wasn't dangerous. Opinions aren't fact. If they were, I'd yell at cancer and call it fake, but I digress.

Robert Saleh isn't going to talk like he did at he NFL meetings if he wasn't confident this trade wasn't going to happen. Likewise with Gute, MLF, and other insiders. This deal is going to happen before the draft, although I will admit that the longer it drags out the higher the chance (albeit miniscule) it falls apart, and that would be because of something like an Aaron bomb dropping (e.g., he falls off a cliff or otherwise injures himself in an ayahuasca trance).

Rodgers says he wants to be a Jet, it's happening.

[texaspackerbacker]

Reading all the media pukes articles gives them them clicks that keep them creating more of the content you hate. You must really crave more of terrible media shitheads. You're part of the problem.

P.S., there isn't a single Packer fan here that craves losing football. You keep making misleading, opinion, over-the-top statements like that. You sound like the clickbait headlines from the media pukes. You're a lot like them, stirring the pot with statements of your personal opinion stated as fact. A real shithead.

hahahaha Good Point. But I don't suppose one click more or less will make much difference.

[texaspackerbacker]

I have no idea who the specific media pukes are, they aren't called out by name. I know there's a lot of stuff out there that isn't fact based, I'm wary of that. There's a difference between a news story and an editorial or opinion piece.
What's been reported by numerous media sources with journalist standards is that this is highly likely to happen, and soon. Really the only questions left are when it happens and for what compensation.
It must be nice to call people names and saying things are fake because you disagree. it'd be kind of cute if it wasn't dangerous. Opinions aren't fact. If they were, I'd yell at cancer and call it fake, but I digress.

Robert Saleh isn't going to talk like he did at he NFL meetings if he wasn't confident this trade wasn't going to happen. Likewise with Gute, MLF, and other insiders. This deal is going to happen before the draft, although I will admit that the longer it drags out the higher the chance (albeit miniscule) it falls apart, and that would be because of something like an Aaron bomb dropping (e.g., he falls off a cliff or otherwise injures himself in an ayahuasca trance).

Rodgers says he wants to be a Jet, it's happening.

You put a lot of stock in "journalistic standards". I guess I won't comment on that in order to avoid a ban for you know what (or should).

What did Robert Saleh say? And did you actually hear it or just see it filtered by the damned media? Obviously he's elated about the idea of having Rodgers, so it's not surprising if he is talking positive about it. Hell, even I am convinced now that the trade is almost sure. Gutekunst, who knows, maybe he's dumb enough to want it to go through too, given that he supposedly is doing the dealing. LaFleur? I highly doubt he is happy about it. Rodgers? He said what he said - there's no denying that, which is why I am so sadly sure about it happening. But the actual trade isn't up to him, and I thoroughly expect that he could/would come back and play like a superstar for the Packers. The people thinking/saying he would tank it or just go through the motions are beyond stupid - IMO.

[sharpe1027]

hahahaha Good Point. But I don't suppose one click more or less will make much difference.

No accountability.

[run pMc]

You put a lot of stock in "journalistic standards". I guess I won't comment on that in order to avoid a ban for you know what (or should).

What did Robert Saleh say? And did you actually hear it or just see it filtered by the damned media? Obviously he's elated about the idea of having Rodgers, so it's not surprising if he is talking positive about it. Hell, even I am convinced now that the trade is almost sure. Gutekunst, who knows, maybe he's dumb enough to want it to go through too, given that he supposedly is doing the dealing. LaFleur? I highly doubt he is happy about it. Rodgers? He said what he said - there's no denying that, which is why I am so sadly sure about it happening. But the actual trade isn't up to him, and I thoroughly expect that he could/would come back and play like a superstar for the Packers. The people thinking/saying he would tank it or just go through the motions are beyond stupid - IMO.

I put stock in journalistic standards because without any standards they don't have credibility. Any quack can get on the internet and post nonsense, if you don't have press credentials you can't even get in 1265 Lambeau. If oyu report for a news outlet that doesn't give a shit about ethics or truth you'll lose credibility and a lot of readers. Say what you will about each, but there's a big difference between the NYTimes and the Weekly World News.

As for Saleh, there are video clips on the news sites and even on stupid twitter where the words are direct from the mouths of Gute, MLF, Saleh, etc. Basically saying there's no rush on the trade, things are moving along, Rodgers may not need to make offseason workouts, etc. In short, talks are leading to a trade happening and it could be soon.
MLF is playing it pretty close to the vest, I think he's not interested in burning bridges and he just wants to win. By nature of his job, Gute has to be thinking of the team with a longer-term view.

I don't believe Rodgers would come back to tank, or that GB wants to tank either. I don't want to see them tank, even last year when they were 4-8 I still wanted them to win. Rodgers is coming back because he wants to win.
I also suspect he's coming back because after last year and this trade, he's going to feel like he has something to prove. I think he'll be better than last year for that reason, but I don't think he'll be MVP again.

[texaspackerbacker]

Actually, 70,000+ people go into 1265 Lambeau 8 or more times a season, not to mention all the non-gameday visits.

And how many of those media puke articles that ya'all swallow like gospel are based on actual interviews with Packer players or staff? Damn few I suspect. Standards? Shi-i-i-i-t. Those bastards are the lowest of the low when it comes to credibility and honesty. "Any quack can get on the internet" has as high or higher a level of credibility, competence, and trustworthiness.

You don't believe Rodgers would "come back tank"? Good, that puts you at a less disgusting level than probably half the people in here, based on posting. "GB" - whoever exactly that might refer to doesn't want them to tank either? Yeah, I'd agree with that literally, but want what clearly will result in tanking the season and at least a few seasons to come? Hell yeah. Everybody that wants to get rid of Rodgers is in that category. You're probably right that Rodgers will play like he has something to prove. That, however, will be true whether it's for the Jets or for the Packers.

I actually haven't seen what Saleh said, but it's certainly not surprising he'd sell his soul to make this trade happen and have the GOAT on his team. For Gutekunst, it's hard to believe he could be that stupid, but it's looking more all the time like he is. I'm certainly not saying there is more than a tiny percentage of hope now that the trade won't go through. LaFleur? Has he come out and said he WANTS the trade to happen? I don't think so, as it would suddenly make him a losing coach.

[sharpe1027]

Hardly anyone swallows opinion pieces as gospel. You're such a shithead. Always treating other people like they are complete idiots and implying you're the only smart person in the world.

[run pMc]

Actually, 70,000+ people go into 1265 Lambeau 8 or more times a season, not to mention all the non-gameday visits.

And how many of those media puke articles that ya'all swallow like gospel are based on actual interviews with Packer players or staff? Damn few I suspect. Standards? Shi-i-i-i-t. Those bastards are the lowest of the low when it comes to credibility and honesty. "Any quack can get on the internet" has as high or higher a level of credibility, competence, and trustworthiness.

You don't believe Rodgers would "come back tank"? Good, that puts you at a less disgusting level than probably half the people in here, based on posting. "GB" - whoever exactly that might refer to doesn't want them to tank either? Yeah, I'd agree with that literally, but want what clearly will result in tanking the season and at least a few seasons to come? Hell yeah. Everybody that wants to get rid of Rodgers is in that category. You're probably right that Rodgers will play like he has something to prove. That, however, will be true whether it's for the Jets or for the Packers.

I actually haven't seen what Saleh said, but it's certainly not surprising he'd sell his soul to make this trade happen and have the GOAT on his team. For Gutekunst, it's hard to believe he could be that stupid, but it's looking more all the time like he is. I'm certainly not saying there is more than a tiny percentage of hope now that the trade won't go through. LaFleur? Has he come out and said he WANTS the trade to happen? I don't think so, as it would suddenly make him a losing coach.

Those are some fairly sweeping assumptions from someone who can't be bothered to do a few minutes of research. Stereotyping is lazy.
If you hate it so much, why do you consume it? If you aren't being at least somewhat selective of your informational sources, you're going to read a lot of crap...and only give the pukes the clicks they need to continue.

Not once have you posted a link to a single story indicating it's good or bad or why. I wonder if you're basically just a troll, you only disagree with others and ignore facts.

[texaspackerbacker]

Assumptions? What assumptions? My style is to ask rhetorical or not rhetorical questions or to say "it seems" or "I suspect" or like that.

Research? What lack of research? I read virtually every piece of crap media puke article I come across. I don't claim to be unbiased about it - I consider most of them dead on arrival, but I still read them (kinda a "know your enemies" thing) hahahaha.

I've never been able to figure out the definition of troll. I thought it meant somebody that doesn't mean what they say, which I don't know how anybody could think that about me. I may not post links (although I don't think even that is a "never"), but a lot of times, I quote or compliment other posters in here when they post something good that I agree with - I think even you occasionally, runpMc.

[Fritz]

I wonder if Aaron Rodgers will play this year.

[sharpe1027]

Assumptions? What assumptions? My style is to ask rhetorical or not rhetorical questions or to say "it seems" or "I suspect" or like that.

Research? What lack of research? I read virtually every piece of crap media puke article I come across. I don't claim to be unbiased about it - I consider most of them dead on arrival, but I still read them (kinda a "know your enemies" thing) hahahaha.

I've never been able to figure out the definition of troll. I thought it meant somebody that doesn't mean what they say, which I don't know how anybody could think that about me. I may not post links (although I don't think even that is a "never"), but a lot of times, I quote or compliment other posters in here when they post something good that I agree with - I think even you occasionally, runpMc.

You're not a troll, you're a shithead that hates Packer fans and assumes you're smarter than everyone else rather than concede you might not know everything.

That being said, the net result is a posting style that looks a lot like a troll.

[Bretsky]

I wonder if Aaron Rodgers will play this year.

Now that he's a FT GD media whore spreading his false agenda's on a weekly Tuesday shitshow he's not giving that up; he's coming back