Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What do the Packers get for Aaron Rodgers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Addition by subtraction is good enough reason, eff that mofo, frikin weirdo like Red.

    Comment


    • #32
      So long as we get to give away most of the cap issues I am willing to get nothing in return besides a conditional pick.
      All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

      George Orwell

      Comment


      • #33
        2nd and a 4th
        The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
        Vince Lombardi

        "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

        Comment


        • #34
          A 2nd and Elijah Moore and a conditional pick in 2024

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
            Addition by subtraction is good enough reason, eff that mofo, frikin weirdo like Red.
            HAve you thought about shopping Red to a Jets forum?

            Comment


            • #36
              I have said all along it has to be a 1st and a 2nd (with potential to move to a 1 with performance or service escalators). If we get 2 1's they should build a statue of Gute at Lambeau

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Sparkey View Post
                A 2nd and Elijah Moore and a conditional pick in 2024
                I'm liking this option a lot. Especially if where the conditional 2024 pick could be up to a 1st if the Jets make the AFC title game or something to that effect.
                60% of the time it works every time.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Andrew Brandt just tweeted that he thought AR's interview shifted leverage to GB. He's put the Jets in a spot where they now have to get the deal done (even more than before). GB can wait... and wait... and wait. Pressure will be on Jets. Should be interesting.

                  Also, as I heard AR, the sticking point seems to be about how much of AR's contract Green Bay will eat.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Right about the leverage being with the Packers. Wrong about the second part. No way in hell they would be stupid enough to do what. It damn well better be about how much the Packers get in trade, and it better be a LOT.
                    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Jaire View Post
                      Andrew Brandt just tweeted that he thought AR's interview shifted leverage to GB. He's put the Jets in a spot where they now have to get the deal done (even more than before). GB can wait... and wait... and wait. Pressure will be on Jets. Should be interesting.

                      Also, as I heard AR, the sticking point seems to be about how much of AR's contract Green Bay will eat.
                      So basically it is a "you want us to eat more, then make it worth our while" type of scenario. Owner of the JETS wants this to happen, so make the owner PAY.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Jaire View Post
                        Andrew Brandt just tweeted that he thought AR's interview shifted leverage to GB. He's put the Jets in a spot where they now have to get the deal done (even more than before). GB can wait... and wait... and wait. Pressure will be on Jets. Should be interesting.

                        Also, as I heard AR, the sticking point seems to be about how much of AR's contract Green Bay will eat.
                        The way it stands, it’s a 4 year, 36M per year deal to whoever takes him. It’s not a bad deal.
                        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by RashanGary View Post
                          The way it stands, it’s a 4 year, 36M per year deal to whoever takes him. It’s not a bad deal.
                          It's a one year deal (max two), 60 million per year. You're looking at the payment spread out, but what really matters is cash cost.

                          edit: I believe Woody Johnson already publicly offered first round picks (without consulting JD, lol). I'm guessing it's the money more than picks. But we'll see how it shakes out.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Fosco33 View Post
                            2nd and a 4th
                            That would work for me at this point.

                            Git'r done.
                            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                            KYPack

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Jaire View Post
                              It's a one year deal (max two), 60 million per year. You're looking at the payment spread out, but what really matters is cash cost.
                              If he retires, prorated parts of the bonus don’t count against the cap. I don’t think they’re as worried about giving away a few million dollars if it doesn’t count on the cap. They have it.
                              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                lol. Rich Eisen is publicly negotiating for Jets. Rodgers, I definitely noticed, was doing some public negotiating too on the Pat Mac show. We'll see who blinks

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X