Love’s first game as El Hombre…

[run pMc]

Oh Cripes, you mean we have to count on Joe Barely?

Shit.

In my dreams, Aaron Rodgers and the NYJ disappoint Woody Johnson enough to get Robert Saleh fired, and he joins his best buddy MLF in GB to be the new DC for 2024.
The door can't hit Joe Barry in the backside fast enough.

[RashanGary]

The over/under for Jordan Love is 3400 yards and 22.5 touchdowns. 5 teams threw for less than 3400 yards. That’s bottom 15% numbers. 15 teams threw for under 22.5 touchdowns. Thats bottom half type numbers.

If the Packers didn’t have some confidence in Love, they’da kissed 12’s ass again. Gotta think they think he’s better than bottom 15%

Imma be betting on over 3400 yards. I think that’s a safe bet if he stays healthy.

[Joemailman]

I suspect a lot of people think the Packers will run the ball more and throw the ball less. I suspect they're wrong.

[texaspackerbacker]

I agree that they will probably stay a pass-first team. The question is, though, is Love up to it? Talent-wise, the team is loaded enough that if he can even come close to that 3,400 yards/22 TD passes and do it without more than a few picks, they really should win at least the 9-10 games somebody speculated. Can he do it? Optimist that I am, I still can't be confident of that.

[MadScientist]

The Packers passed 53.6% of the time last year. I suspect they will be around that again this season.

[sharpe1027]

I agree that they will probably stay a pass-first team. The question is, though, is Love up to it? Talent-wise, the team is loaded enough that if he can even come close to that 3,400 yards/22 TD passes and do it without more than a few picks, they really should win at least the 9-10 games somebody speculated. Can he do it? Optimist that I am, I still can't be confident of that.

Loaded? I thought the offensive line was terrible? How can a loaded team have a losing record and not make the playoffs? Adding some rookies can't be enough to go from a losing team to being loaded with talent. Are you now saying Rodgers played that badly?

[RashanGary]

Loaded? I thought the offensive line was terrible? How can a loaded team have a losing record and not make the playoffs? Adding some rookies can't be enough to go from a losing team to being loaded with talent. Are you now saying Rodgers played that badly?

Haha! True, how could this loaded team with the goat at QB not win more than 8 games last year

[texaspackerbacker]

Loaded? I thought the offensive line was terrible? How can a loaded team have a losing record and not make the playoffs? Adding some rookies can't be enough to go from a losing team to being loaded with talent. Are you now saying Rodgers played that badly?

hahahahaha I appreciate the fact that you read and remember my posts so well. Keep up the good work, Grasshopper. If you recall, though, I also said, O Line beyond the bare minimum, is not very significant as a factor in a team's success. Based on his own standard of greatness and with the extenuating circumstances of injuries to himself and the receivers, of course Rodgers played bad last year. We can only hope Love plays up to that level of "badness". If he does, and the receivers stay relatively healthy, and Barry can get his head even halfway out of his ass with all that talent on defense, then hell yes, they are a loaded team - just like anybody with a lick of sense thought the Packers were last season, and they woulda been if not for most of the receivers and Rodgers getting hurt and Barry shitting the bed as a DC.

[sharpe1027]

So a team like the 49ers can go 13-4 with Jimmy G. and Brock Purdy, but a loaded Packers team with Rodgers couldn't make the playoffs?

No. The Packers simply aren't loaded with talent ignoring the QB position. I'd not argue with them being average, but they're not loaded.

[run pMc]

O Line beyond the bare minimum, is not very significant as a factor in a team's success.

Some might call that a dumb take, but I'll just say it's a take any GM or QB or RB would disagree with. There's a reason most elite tackles are taken in the Top 10, and more are taken than WR or TE, or punter. If you think OL doesn't matter, I'd refer you back to early last season when they decided to trot out Hansen and Newman on the right side. Can't blame Rodgers performance on injuries and then turn around and say OL doesn't matter beyond 'bare minimum'. You also don't have Aaron Jones running for 1000 yards without a decent OL.

As for the packers roster, they have talent. A LOT of it underperformed last year: Myers, Dillon, Stokes, Savage, Devondre, et al. Even Jaire and Kenny Clark had decent if somewhat down years (for them). Are they loaded?
SF has more talent and are at the top along with PHI in the NFC. GB's roster has some holes and warts but could compete for a wildcard spot. They shouldn't go 3-14 like the Bears did last year. That team had so little talent it tried to build a roster from other teams' training camp cuts.

I will say with something like 25 drafted players in the last two years, GB has a lot of young but unproven talent. A lot of it won't pan out, but even if they hit on 30% of the picks they're doing ok.

[sharpe1027]

I think the Packers are setup with the potential to have a real good group of players in two or three years. They have shifted younger over the past two years and it's likely they will have some struggles this year. Hopefully, it pays dividends in a few years.

[texaspackerbacker]

Some might call that a dumb take, but I'll just say it's a take any GM or QB or RB would disagree with. There's a reason most elite tackles are taken in the Top 10, and more are taken than WR or TE, or punter. If you think OL doesn't matter, I'd refer you back to early last season when they decided to trot out Hansen and Newman on the right side. Can't blame Rodgers performance on injuries and then turn around and say OL doesn't matter beyond 'bare minimum'. You also don't have Aaron Jones running for 1000 yards without a decent OL.

As for the packers roster, they have talent. A LOT of it underperformed last year: Myers, Dillon, Stokes, Savage, Devondre, et al. Even Jaire and Kenny Clark had decent if somewhat down years (for them). Are they loaded?
SF has more talent and are at the top along with PHI in the NFC. GB's roster has some holes and warts but could compete for a wildcard spot. They shouldn't go 3-14 like the Bears did last year. That team had so little talent it tried to build a roster from other teams' training camp cuts.

I will say with something like 25 drafted players in the last two years, GB has a lot of young but unproven talent. A lot of it won't pan out, but even if they hit on 30% of the picks they're doing ok.

How many of those top ten picked O Linemen over the years have flopped? I'll suggest it was a large percentage of them - all the way from Mandarich to the present (I'm sure if I'm wrong, one of these whiny fact checkers in here will look it up and say otherwise hahahaha).

Which teams had the highest reputed O Lines over past years? One of them that I can think of was the Lions, and it didn't keep them from being bottom-dwellers.

I stand by what I have said 100% - Rodgers and Favre MADE the reputation of the Packers O Lines as being above average, some would say excellent. What I saw over the years/decades was consistent heavy pass rush pressure on Packer QBs that Favre and Rodgers got away from. The few games they missed, guys like Seneca Wallace and Tolzien were literally running for their lives. And did the Packers have a top flight running game over those same times. Sometimes yes, but arguably, that was MADE by the Rodgers/Favre passing game and would not have stood by itself with a mediocre passing game.

What do we have now? Potentially great pass receivers, Aaron Jones who as a change of pace RB is as good as any in the league. I don't think he could handle a true run-first offense, carrying it 25 or 30 a game. And Dillon got kinda exposed as not so great last season except as a change of pace guy. Our D could certainly be near the top of the league if Barry is any kind of a decent DC. It all comes down to Love.

I said previously, it could be anything from 5 or 6 wins if Love flops to 13 or 14 if he is good. If by some miracle, he reaches Rodgers level, the sky's the limit. My guess too would be 8 - 10 wins with Love being a half step above the pits.

Who in here can honestly say they didn't thoroughly expect the Packers to be just about the best team in the league going into last season? I certainly did.

[run pMc]

You'll stand by what you said even after you've been proven wrong.

There have been surveys of picks by position and showed the vast majority of Pro-Bowl and All-Pro tackles are taken in the first round, most often high in the first round.
Of course some R1 picks will bust out, that doesn't change the fact that if you want a good pair of tackles, you'll probably need to draft them early.

Say whatever you like about Rodgers and Favre, the GB OL has received very high pass blocking grades on a consistent basis for many years. There are football analytics sites that prove this, and believe it or not the eyeball test supports it as well. Watch some other teams' OL.

The Lions and Philly probably had the best OL in the NFC last year, and both beat GB. Neither team was a bottom-dweller last year and actually finished better than GB.
Jared Goff was patting the ball waiting for guys to get open, he had so much time. Would you say Jared Goff made his line better?

I've long ago come to the conclusion that you're either (a) fairly ignorant about the game and just a blind fan, or (b) you're a troll. Hard to say, your posts seem to ignore objective facts.

[sharpe1027]

Tex doesn't give a shit about anything that doesn't fit his predetermined narrative. It's a fun diversion to engage the stupidity, but ultimately pointless.

[texaspackerbacker]

You'll stand by what you said even after you've been proven wrong.

There have been surveys of picks by position and showed the vast majority of Pro-Bowl and All-Pro tackles are taken in the first round, most often high in the first round.
Of course some R1 picks will bust out, that doesn't change the fact that if you want a good pair of tackles, you'll probably need to draft them early.

Say whatever you like about Rodgers and Favre, the GB OL has received very high pass blocking grades on a consistent basis for many years. There are football analytics sites that prove this, and believe it or not the eyeball test supports it as well. Watch some other teams' OL.

The Lions and Philly probably had the best OL in the NFC last year, and both beat GB. Neither team was a bottom-dweller last year and actually finished better than GB.
Jared Goff was patting the ball waiting for guys to get open, he had so much time. Would you say Jared Goff made his line better?

I've long ago come to the conclusion that you're either (a) fairly ignorant about the game and just a blind fan, or (b) you're a troll. Hard to say, your posts seem to ignore objective facts.

Proven wrong huh? hahahahahahahaha

There's somehow proof that the line was great and they didn't just have good stats because of the QBs? Yeah right to that hahahahahahahaha.

I'll give you that it could somehow be the way ya'all want to believe, but cause and effect just can't be proven. Analyzing how good a block is? Nothing subjective about that hahahahaha - the QB doesn't get sacked and gets the pass away, and wow, it's great blocking, even though it sure as hell didn't look that way according to how the play went. Other teams? Oh, how about Brady's Patriots for many years and then at Tampa too. I think it's safe to say he didn't have the mobility to make his lines look overly good. I don't know, were they loaded with high draft picks?

The Lions have had that great reputation O Line for a long time, and they still manage to be losers. The Bears have had above average O Lines throughout their years as chronic losers. Philadelphia? I honestly don't know who or what kind of draft picks their personnel are, but it's a safe bet that Jalen Hurts had a lot to do with the perception that they were so good. You got any counter examples? Winners with mediocre QBs and "great" O Lines?

What I said is that a bigger percentage of O Linemen drafted early in the first round are busts? Do you seriously dispute that?

I've tended to give you the benefit of the doubt as fairly competent and civil - unlike the fool who posted just below yours, but sometimes I wonder about you too. Swallowing shit doesn't somehow make that shit not shit.