Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is It Just a Disgruntled Former Packer or Is There Truth?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Mike Daniels in two minutes names the problem with the Packers defense for a long while. I would not say every year or post season. But most. Same for the offense, which is too finesse.

    "We knew we were tougher than you guys."

    They did bring it a few years and post seasons, but overall this has been the problem. Just need a new DC. LaFleur does not exude toughness, sorry to say.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Jaire View Post
      Mike Daniels in two minutes names the problem with the Packers defense for a long while. I would not say every year or post season. But most. Same for the offense, which is too finesse.

      "We knew we were tougher than you guys."

      They did bring it a few years and post seasons, but overall this has been the problem. Just need a new DC. LaFleur does not exude toughness, sorry to say.

      https://x.com/gameonwi/status/1715011146715943241?s=20
      As I've been saying, I want one of those asshole DCs that nobody likes. Schwartz, Williams or some other prick. They need some attitude.
      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
        As I've been saying, I want one of those asshole DCs that nobody likes. Schwartz, Williams or some other prick. They need some attitude.
        I don't think it has to be a guy like Schultz or Greg Williams. I don't think Barry is a mediocrity because he doesn't have enough attitude. I think he's a mediocrity because he's a mediocre defensive mind. Were Fritz Shurmur and Dom Capers "attitude guys"?
        I can't run no more
        With that lawless crowd
        While the killers in high places
        Say their prayers out loud
        But they've summoned, they've summoned up
        A thundercloud
        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
          I don't think it has to be a guy like Schultz or Greg Williams. I don't think Barry is a mediocrity because he doesn't have enough attitude. I think he's a mediocrity because he's a mediocre defensive mind. Were Fritz Shurmur and Dom Capers "attitude guys"?
          This. There's multiple ways to coach and motivate. We like to oversimplify things. TOO SOFT! If only we yelled at them more and made them eat more read meat!!!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
            I don't think it has to be a guy like Schultz or Greg Williams. I don't think Barry is a mediocrity because he doesn't have enough attitude. I think he's a mediocrity because he's a mediocre defensive mind. Were Fritz Shurmur and Dom Capers "attitude guys"?
            +1 to this. I always said we don’t need a rah rah guy. We need a cerebral guy. The trouble with Barry is he doesn’t seem to have much imagination or ability to adjust.
            What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

            Comment


            • #21
              Shurmer was a little bit of an attitude guy and Capers got worse each year. Give me Rex Ryan or someone with a proven record of building a dominant D. Fangio isn't an attitude guy, and I would have loved to have had him. My point is half tongue in cheek. We play soft. Half the guys don't attack ball carriers. The system is soft in and of itself. No, we don't need a prick, but we do need someone with an attack mindset. We've been playing on our heels for 2 decades because our HCs are terrified of the big play.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #22
                Give me a young creative thinker as there are so many of around the league.
                What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                  I don't think it has to be a guy like Schultz or Greg Williams. I don't think Barry is a mediocrity because he doesn't have enough attitude. I think he's a mediocrity because he's a mediocre defensive mind. Were Fritz Shurmur and Dom Capers "attitude guys"?
                  Agree. Barry has had 3 shots at being a DC, and he has never coached an above average defense in... what, 7 or 8 seasons now? There's enough data at this point. Defense varies quite a bit year over year because of things like schedule and turnovers, but you are almost certain to at least luck into a top half defense at some point and I'm not sure Barry's defenses ever have.

                  As for the next DC, I actually agree with Tex. I think you need someone new and creative. Capers fell asleep in the booth once teams figured out his defense (and players left), Fangio's defense has been copied and is run in a lot of places and offenses are starting to figure that out too. Denver actually has Vance Joseph running the Fangio defense (not his own) and he's not good at it. I think your best bet with a Coach X-style defense is to actually employ Coach X. They understand all the nuances, how it should be taught, coached, implemented, and used to counterpunch when an offense throws a curveball. All the copycats are unlikely to have that deep innate understanding of the scheme and why/how it was created.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I'm fine with a young innovative thinker as well. I would have loved Emero or Leonhard. I wonder if Leonhard even wants the gig at this point.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                      Give me a young creative thinker as there are so many of around the league.
                      Say it with me TEX; it'll feel good

                      JIMMY
                      JIMMY
                      JIMMY
                      JIMMY
                      JIMMY
                      TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I wasn’t real thrilled with Jimmy as Badger DC. His D actually reminded me a lot of Barry’s - pass rush that comes close but mostly doesn’t get home, weak against the run, and giving up big pass plays. And he didn’t seem too hot at adjusting either.

                        It just seems like most of our opponents do a helluva lot more with less talent.
                        What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          As usual Tex doesn't remember what really happened.

                          The actual stats of WI D at the time.
                          2021 - 1st in Total Defense, 4th in PPG allowed, 2nd nationally in yards per play 4.17
                          2020 - 5th in Total Defense, 9th in PPG allowed
                          2019 - 8th in Total Defense, 10th in PPG allowed
                          2018 - 41st in Total Defense, 43rd in PPG allowed
                          2017 - 1st in Total Defense, 3rd in PPG allowed
                          But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                          -Tim Harmston

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                            As usual Tex doesn't remember what really happened.

                            The actual stats of WI D at the time.
                            2021 - 1st in Total Defense, 4th in PPG allowed, 2nd nationally in yards per play 4.17
                            2020 - 5th in Total Defense, 9th in PPG allowed
                            2019 - 8th in Total Defense, 10th in PPG allowed
                            2018 - 41st in Total Defense, 43rd in PPG allowed
                            2017 - 1st in Total Defense, 3rd in PPG allowed
                            Substitute Southern Kentucky Confederate State A&M for the Ohio State University, and ole Tex actually has an argument. Leonhard’s defense feasted on cupcakes while it got feasted on by all the hotshot semi-pro teams like OSU and Michigan.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear View Post
                              Substitute Southern Kentucky Confederate State A&M for the Ohio State University, and ole Tex actually has an argument. Leonhard’s defense feasted on cupcakes while it got feasted on by all the hotshot semi-pro teams like OSU and Michigan.
                              No wonder you are flipping burgers and not a CPA. You don’t do any research to support your conclusions.

                              From 17-21
                              3-2 head to head against MI. O-3 head to head against OSU

                              MI - ignoring the 2018 year. Held MI offense to 11.5 less points and 114.25 yards less than MI ave for those years.
                              OSU - didn’t play in 18. Held OSU offense to 12 less PPG and 115 yards less PG than OSU ave for those years.

                              Considering the drop in talent level of recruiting for MI and OSU vs WI those numbers look even better.
                              But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                              -Tim Harmston

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                                No wonder you are flipping burgers and not a CPA. You don’t do any research to support your conclusions.

                                From 17-21
                                3-2 head to head against MI. O-3 head to head against OSU

                                MI - ignoring the 2018 year. Held MI offense to 11.5 less points and 114.25 yards less than MI ave for those years.
                                OSU - didn’t play in 18. Held OSU offense to 12 less PPG and 115 yards less PG than OSU ave for those years.

                                Considering the drop in talent level of recruiting for MI and OSU vs WI those numbers look even better.
                                What's more is against OSU, the defense often held up really well for about 3 quarters with very little offense to support them.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X