Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official NFL Draft Day 3 (Rounds 4-7) NFL Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
    How many players have to pan out to say it was worth it?
    Jordan Love panned out. That'll be Gute's legacy. Everything else is gravy.

    Comment


    • #92
      DB Evan Williams: No. 33
      Aaron Jones’ old number didn’t stay vacant for long. Williams wore No. 32 at Fresno State and No. 33 at Oregon.

      OL Jacob Monk: No. 62
      The last two players to wear No. 62? Lucas Patrick and Evan Dietrich-Smith. Monk is likely to play center in Green Bay.

      S Kitan Oladapo: No. 27
      Patrick Taylor, who is now in San Francisco, wore No. 27 from 2020 to 2023. Eddie Lacy and Terrell Buckley are the most well-known former players to wear the number. Others include 2017 second-round pick Josh Jones, 2006 fourth-round pick Will Blackmon and Anthony Smith, a Super Bowl winner in 2010. Oladapo wore No. 28, but A.J. Dillon retained the number.

      OL Travis Glover: No. 79
      His collegiate No. 52 is currently in use (Rashan Gary). The last player to wear No. 79 in a game for the Packers was Dennis Kelly.

      QB Michael Pratt: No. 17
      A little surprising, knowing kicker Anders Carlson already wears No. 17. Obviously, Davante Adams is the best player in team history to wear the number. Former quarterback David Whitehurst also wore No. 17. So did Hall of Famer Ceil Isbell.

      CB Kalen King: No. 34
      King wore No. 4 at Penn State, but the Packers have No. 4 retired for Brett Favre. No. 24 isn’t available (Tyler Coyle), so King will start at No. 34, last worn by Jonathan Owens last season.
      I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Scott Campbell View Post
        I wouldn't have made that trade. Rasul was a really good player, and we probably didn't replace him even with all these picks this year.
        Would he have been the difference in the niners loss?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Scott Campbell View Post
          Jordan Love panned out. That'll be Gute's legacy. Everything else is gravy.
          Maybe that’s why he is going Sinatra and doing it his way. Arrogance can lead to brilliant moments.

          Comment


          • #95
            We can't know everything that went into the decision to trade Rasul. Maybe he was so sick of Barry that Gute was afraid he was becoming a malcontent. Certainly Campbell did. At any rate I still don't think the pass defense got noticeably worse after the trade as Valentine and Ballentine played pretty well.
            I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
            While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
            But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
            They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
              Would he (Rasul) have been the difference in the niners loss?
              Hard to say, but I doubt it. Though they played them pretty close, so who knows.

              I think they lost that game because Brock Purdy caught fire in the 4th.

              Comment


              • #97
                On defense, having a capable safety play instead of Savage probably wins the game. He missed a tackle on the McCaffrey TD run and was the closest defender on the Kittle TD. Also dropped a pick-6.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                  On defense, having a capable safety play instead of Savage probably wins the game. He missed a tackle on the McCaffrey TD run and was the closest defender on the Kittle TD. Also dropped a pick-6.
                  I think I saw somewhere that Anthony Johnson Jr. was supposed to drop back and help Savage with Kittle. Either way, it wasn't a CB that cost them that game, unless you think Nixon did.. and Rasul wasn't any better in the slot. Having better safeties would have made a difference.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Sparkey View Post
                    You can not like 230lbs lb's taking on lineman blocks as much as you can not like 250lb lb's trying to cover rb's out of the backfield.

                    Pick and choose.
                    Which is why I was shocked they didn't get any of the quality DL available although a slew of them went where we picked said 230lb LB.
                    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MadtownPacker View Post
                      Would he have been the difference in the niners loss?
                      If he were playing safety as I begged for in the spring, he very well might have. Savage blew 2 tackles that lead to long TDs. One on CM3 and another on Kittles.
                      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                        On defense, having a capable safety play instead of Savage probably wins the game. He missed a tackle on the McCaffrey TD run and was the closest defender on the Kittle TD. Also dropped a pick-6.
                        yea, what he said.
                        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X