Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THE OFFENSE ..... HMMM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    The offense looked pretty good with Willis.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
      The offense looked pretty good with Willis.
      I commented on this during both games. The Packers running game was different when Willis was in. Different personnel, different running plays.

      I said I can’t wait to see Love as QB running this way. Love comes back and we go back to the “old” running game.

      Not sure, but I think we had an extra TE or RB in rather than WR when Willis was QB.
      But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

      -Tim Harmston

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
        Packers are 5th in the NFL in rushing and have given up the least amount of sacks. What do you think is lacking?
        Far too many penalties. Some are their fault (false starts) and some are on others (poor RPO decisions) but this group too often puts us way behind the chains. They have killed numerous drives this season with some really stupid penalties.
        It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by King Friday View Post
          Far too many penalties. Some are their fault (false starts) and some are on others (poor RPO decisions) but this group too often puts us way behind the chains. They have killed numerous drives this season with some really stupid penalties.
          All penalties commited by the Green Bay Packers during the 2024 season, viewed by penalty.
          The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
          Vince Lombardi

          "Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by QBME View Post
            I can tell you most assuredly that Patler did not in anyway coin the term “Patlerized”. It has it’s origins back in the JSO days and even had a bright red, all caps diagonal stamp that was delivered to deserving posters. I can’t remember who came up with it and issued the rebukes -KY Pack might recall it - but it sure wasn’t Patler, he’s got too much class for it.

            So, please, get off your high horse lest someone with a less than perfect line of sight makes an equine anatomy mistaken reference.
            I guess I didn't mean coined as much as he was the father of it. I knew the origins though. I haven't been communicating very well lately as has been pointed out to me. I'm working on it.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Patler View Post
              Well that sure didn't come across as intended! Even editing to reference my correction, changing "Lacy" to: "that running back they signed to replace whatshisname" didn't help!

              I meant it like, after saying something stupid, saying; "I'll shut-up now!", not literally!
              I understood. I was messing with you. As I said, I haven't been conveying my meaning very well lately.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #37
                Not as far from league averages as I would have thought. Looking at the game by game, defense and ST are OK, clear issues with offense, but seem to be getting better.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                  I commented on this during both games. The Packers running game was different when Willis was in. Different personnel, different running plays.

                  I said I can’t wait to see Love as QB running this way. Love comes back and we go back to the “old” running game.

                  Not sure, but I think we had an extra TE or RB in rather than WR when Willis was QB.
                  Right? Is it because of what Willis brings to the table or because the coaching staff approached the game plan differently? Probably some of both, but I think it's more about the coaching decisions.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                    I guess I didn't mean coined as much as he was the father of it. I knew the origins though. I haven't been communicating very well lately as has been pointed out to me. I'm working on it.
                    No worries.

                    Don't let the bastards wear you down.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
                      Right? Is it because of what Willis brings to the table or because the coaching staff approached the game plan differently? Probably some of both, but I think it's more about the coaching decisions.
                      I agree. Willis doesn’t have the time in the offense and brings a different skill set. It would be stupid to have the same game plan with both QBs.

                      But some of the running plays were excellent when Willis was in. The other team knew we were running and we still pushed it down their throat.
                      But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                      -Tim Harmston

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Alright fair points about the offensive line. Maybe I am wrong. I wonder why the offense seems so much more a struggle compared to late last year. Soemthing just seems off to me.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by call_me_ishmael View Post
                          Alright fair points about the offensive line. Maybe I am wrong. I wonder why the offense seems so much more a struggle compared to late last year. Soemthing just seems off to me.
                          If they had more red zone success, you probably would not feel that way.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Patler View Post
                            If they had more red zone success, you probably would not feel that way.
                            Bingo!!

                            Better red zone and Love not turning the ball over every game would make the offense close to Det.
                            But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                            -Tim Harmston

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by ThunderDan View Post
                              Bingo!!

                              Better red zone and Love not turning the ball over every game would make the offense close to Det.
                              Packers were 3/5 in the red zone last week against the NFL's #1 red zone defense, so they may be turning it around. This is the time of year things turned last year.
                              I can't run no more
                              With that lawless crowd
                              While the killers in high places
                              Say their prayers out loud
                              But they've summoned, they've summoned up
                              A thundercloud
                              They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                                Packers were 3/5 in the red zone last week against the NFL's #1 red zone defense, so they may be turning it around. This is the time of year things turned last year.
                                Last year they were a young team getting to know each other. I don’t think that excuse applies this season.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X