Originally posted by smuggler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Packers Offseason/Free Agency/ Non-Draft Thread
Collapse
X
-
100% agree with this post. You don't give up a 1st rounder for a player who only has 1 year left on his contract.Originally posted by run pMc View PostMetcalf is going to want an extension. Trading a high draft pick for the privilege of signing a player to an expensive contract is generally bad process.
I think he's a very good but not elite player and a R1 + Doubs is steep, whether you want to compare with Deebo or not.
I do think Metcalf would affect defenses in the way MLF wants though.
What they really need is for Wicks and Reed to figure out how to beat man coverage and not drop the ball when it hits their hands.
Watson's knee injury was separate from the other things he had prior to last season. I think the trip to Madison worked for him. He's in a contract year, and with him missing at least 2/3 of it, I suspect they could bring him back on a reasonable deal with incentives.
Deebo for a 5th. I would give a 3rd for Metcalf.But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.
-Tim Harmston
Comment
-
I'm not sure our opinions are that much different. I like Doubs, and think he is a valuable WR to have. He is effective, but not high impact. QBs seem to find him, and he is mostly reliable when thrown to. But, he has been the most targeted receiver the last 3 years, yet has no 100 yard games, only two games with 80+ yards, no 40+ yard receptions. You can't build a big-time passing game around Doubs as the primary receiver. Possession type receivers are valuable, but more easily found than true game breakers.Originally posted by MadtownPacker View PostYou know my opinion on Doubs is the opposite of yours and many others here, but you are correct in this situation. Hurt to say it, but the first hard shot he takes will probably take him out for a week or two. He is the best set of hands but health is bad. If Seattle took him ok but they would want Wicks or Watson. I say trade whichever is accepted for DK.Originally posted by Patler View PostInteresting, because Doubs would be the first of those three that I would let go. Watson and Wicks scream potential above average. Doubs will be what he has been; good, mostly reliable, not an impact player. Doubs is more easily replaced. He has never had a 100 yard game during the regular season, has had only two games with more than 80 yards. He has no receptions of 40 or more yards. He breaks few tackles and has minimal YAC.
Given more opportunities, Malik Heath might develop into a suitable substitute (not replacement) for Doubs.
Wicks and Watson just have more potential, which I would like to see play out. I don't see Doubs ever being much more than he already is, which is decent even if not high impact.
Comment
-
Agree of the top 4, Doubs has the lowest ceiling/upside. You could argue he has a higher floor than Wicks and Watson. He technically had a 100+ yard game vs. DAL in the playoffs last year.
I'd say he's been a good draft pick for a Day 3 WR, and I think he'll get a 2nd contract elsewhere for more than he'll struggle to perform up to. He's a good WR3/4 and some probably expect more than that.
I wouldn't rush out to sign him to a 3/45M deal, someone will. Gute needs to keep drafting WRs. MLF needs to develop them better.
Comment
-
That Knee injury was due to the hamstring not protecting the knee, in most non-contact ACL injuries it is because the hamstring fails, so say what you what about his trip to Madison as there many factors to the hamstring and ACL injuries, but in most cases hamstring instability leads to the instability of the knee which then creates the potential for ACL injuriesOriginally posted by run pMc View PostMetcalf is going to want an extension. Trading a high draft pick for the privilege of signing a player to an expensive contract is generally bad process.
I think he's a very good but not elite player and a R1 + Doubs is steep, whether you want to compare with Deebo or not.
I do think Metcalf would affect defenses in the way MLF wants though.
What they really need is for Wicks and Reed to figure out how to beat man coverage and not drop the ball when it hits their hands.
Watson's knee injury was separate from the other things he had prior to last season. I think the trip to Madison worked for him. He's in a contract year, and with him missing at least 2/3 of it, I suspect they could bring him back on a reasonable deal with incentives.
Comment
-
I don't hate him, but he isn't special. I don't know how many draft picks the Packers want to continue to dump into their linebacker position group, so in that sense the signing makes sense because he really doesn't hurt you. Ty'ron Hopper was taken with a 4th round pick last year and his development has been slower than you want but unfortunately what you expected if you read his pre draft write ups. Also Eric Wilson was decent as well. My question is can Quay Walker finally take his final steps to becoming a consistent above average linebacker that is worthy of an extension?Originally posted by Joemailman View PostJeremy Fowler
@JFowlerESPN
Sources: #Packers are re-signing LB Isaiah McDuffie on a two-year, $8-million deal with upside to $9.5M.
McDuffie has 183 tackles over the last two seasons.
Comment
-
This is why I’d ship him over Doubs. I don’t think Watson can stay on the field to have production. And Doubs concussion issues could subside with time while Watsons recurring Hamstring (now ACL) put his ceiling lower imo.Originally posted by Deputy Nutz View PostThat Knee injury was due to the hamstring not protecting the knee, in most non-contact ACL injuries it is because the hamstring fails, so say what you what about his trip to Madison as there many factors to the hamstring and ACL injuries, but in most cases hamstring instability leads to the instability of the knee which then creates the potential for ACL injuriesThe measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
Well, re-signing the Scottish butthole was probably the most important signing the Packers could've made. Kickers don't cost that much, and now they've got one and have one less position to fret about."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPack
Comment
-
I think there's a much better chance that the Packers sign MVS than Davante. Showed last year he still has his speed and would come cheap.I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Comment

Comment