Originally posted by swede
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trade Up For Peterson?!?
Collapse
X
-
Does that mean I can get naked now?Originally posted by redWLECOME TO THE RUN UP TO DRAFT DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
everything you hear any team say about every player is complete BS
its deception time in the nfl
nothing but a smoke screen"You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
You mean we're not supposed to be naked already?Originally posted by SkinBasketDoes that mean I can get naked now?Originally posted by redWLECOME TO THE RUN UP TO DRAFT DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
everything you hear any team say about every player is complete BS
its deception time in the nfl
nothing but a smoke screen
Comment
-
Originally posted by SkinBasketOriginally posted by BallHawkActually, I think if we took a poll of this forum the majority would be AGAINST taking Marshawn Lynch. It's just there are some people that talk about him a lot and it does make it seem like people really want Lynch.Originally posted by PartialWhy is everyone so enamored with Marshawn Lynch? What does he bring to the table that RB by committee has shown it can't do? I've seen Denver make the playoffs with some average backs at best.
Our running game sucked because our OL was inexperienced and they would use minimum eight men in the box against us. Get a deep threat and watch as the running game steadily improves.
IMO, Lynch is nothing more than an average RB with a brain damage, who is the product of playing against PAC-10 teams, who focus more on offense than on defense. He really is not that good. Last year the first round picks at RB (excluding Bush at #2) were Laurence Maroney, DeAngello Williams, and Joseph Addai, drafted at #21, #27, and #30, respectively. You could honestly make the arguement that any of those 3 were better picks than Lynch coming out of college, not even using the information we know about them now. Outside of Adrian Peterson, you could argue that none of these backs are deserving of a first round pick. Lynch is very reminiscent of former CAL RB, JJ Arrington. If we are to address RB in this draft I would prefer we do it in the late 1st round or 2nd round with players like Bush, Irons, and Hunt.
BINGO!
And trading up for Peterson would be a step shy of retarded. We gots to too many position needs to simply throw away a high second round pick on a guy who has overrated speed. The rest of his game is nice, but not worth two picks. Not even close. Unless it was a 1st and a 5th, but that won't move a team 8 spots up in the 1st round obviously.
But would you run the risk with Bush?
Comment
-
Right on, Partial. I absolutely agree with your point.Originally posted by PartialWhy is everyone so enamored with Marshawn Lynch? What does he bring to the table that RB by committee has shown it can't do? I've seen Denver make the playoffs with some average backs at best.
Our running game sucked because our OL was inexperienced and they would use minimum eight men in the box against us. Get a deep threat and watch as the running game steadily improves.
My only point is that I believe there is a definite purpose to a "Packer insider" leaking something to the media, and it isn't because he wants the world to know what the inside brass is planning or wanting to do. That would be highly counterproductive.
The productive purpose is, in fact, just the opposite...
Comment
-
perhaps they just want to stir up interest in the draft and they want to show that they are "willing" to make improvements to their O.Originally posted by vinceRight on, Partial. I absolutely agree with your point.Originally posted by PartialWhy is everyone so enamored with Marshawn Lynch? What does he bring to the table that RB by committee has shown it can't do? I've seen Denver make the playoffs with some average backs at best.
Our running game sucked because our OL was inexperienced and they would use minimum eight men in the box against us. Get a deep threat and watch as the running game steadily improves.
My only point is that I believe there is a definite purpose to a "Packer insider" leaking something to the media, and it isn't because he wants the world to know what the inside brass is planning or wanting to do. That would be highly counterproductive.
The productive purpose is, in fact, just the opposite...
Comment
-
SD, in all probability that is what TT is doing. He is throwing out things and trying to put himself in a position so on draft day he can get as many trade offers as possible. And I'm about 95% sure TT will not trade up. That would be a very, very risky move and a risk TT would be wise not to take."I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
Comment

Comment