Moss Will Not Be A Packer!!!

[BlueBrewer]

A lot of you are talking in here like Moss is already on the roster. I have news for you, it ain't gonna happen. Al Davis has way to high a price in his head and TT is a tight ass. I'm not saying that i don't like the prospect of him on the Packers and actually finishing routes, I do, but its not going to happen. The Raiders and Packers have both stated that there have been no disussions regarding Moss, so wake up people!!!

[PaCkFan_n_MD]

Acutally there has been reports both ways. Some saying that the packers and Radiers are still talking and some that say theres really no discussions. You cant say for sure the trade will not happen. All the teams with the most money have spent a lot of it and we probably have one of the highest caps now. If Moss can be had for a 3rd and a player, I see no reason why the trade can't happen. I rather not give up a second, but I still want Moss here.

[swede]

I wonder why Moss isn't talking one way or the other.

With a mouth like his you'd have thought you'd have heard something about how he feels about prospective trade partners.

[BlueBrewer]

I wonder why Moss isn't talking one way or the other.

With a mouth like his you'd have thought you'd have heard something about how he feels about prospective trade partners.

good point, its probably filled with a big Blunt.

[woodbuck27]

For those of you who are salivating over the prospects of Randy Moss to Green Bay. Forget about it.

One

We can't afford Randy Moss's contract needs unless Brett Favre comes to the rescue and restructures his contract dramatically and . . .

Two

Its been reported that Randy Moss desires to be a winner again.
That would rule out the Packers in 2007 and what appears longer.

See Ahman Green and the consequences of that loss to OUR running game and why it would make little sense now for Favre to restructure his contract again ' for the team '.

See the moves an organization like the Pat's are making this off sason to date to secure the AFC Title in 2007.

The question mark is whether or not the Pat's can come up with the money needed to gain Randy Moss.


Three

It's very possible (see Nick Barnett and Brett Favre) that Randy Moss or any player costing in the $6-8 million dollar per season range, will not be a fit for Ted Thompson's two - three year plans or his agenda to secure the same.

[Zool]

For those of you who are salivating over the prospects of Randy Moss to Green Bay. Forget about it.

One

We can't afford Randy Moss's contract needs unless Brett Favre comes to the rescue and restructures his contract dramatically and . . .

Two

Its been reported that Randy Moss desires to be a winner again.
That would rule out the Packers in 2007 and what appears longer.

See Ahman Green and the consequences of that loss to OUR running game and why it would make little sense now for Favre to restructure his contract again ' for the team '.

See the moves an organization like the Pat's are making this off sason to date to secure the AFC Title in 2007.

The question mark is whether or not the Pat's can come up with the money needed to gain Randy Moss.


Three

It's very possible (see Nick Barnett and Brett Favre) that Randy Moss or any player costing in the $6-8 million dollar per season range, will be a fit for Ted Thompson's two - three year plans or his agenda to secure the same.

Thank you oracle.

[woodbuck27]

For those of you who are salivating over the prospects of Randy Moss to Green Bay. Forget about it.

One

We can't afford Randy Moss's contract needs unless Brett Favre comes to the rescue and restructures his contract dramatically and . . .

Two

Its been reported that Randy Moss desires to be a winner again.
That would rule out the Packers in 2007 and what appears longer.

See Ahman Green and the consequences of that loss to OUR running game and why it would make little sense now for Favre to restructure his contract again ' for the team '.

See the moves an organization like the Pat's are making this off sason to date to secure the AFC Title in 2007.

The question mark is whether or not the Pat's can come up with the money needed to gain Randy Moss.


Three

It's very possible (see Nick Barnett and Brett Favre) that Randy Moss or any player costing in the $6-8 million dollar per season range, will be a fit for Ted Thompson's two - three year plans or his agenda to secure the same.

Thank you oracle.

Edit


Three

Then, it's very possible (see Nick Barnett and Brett Favre) that Randy Moss or any player costing in the $6-8 million dollar per season range, will not be a fit for Ted Thompson's two - three year plans or his agenda to secure the same.

[BF4MVP]

We can't afford Randy Moss's contract needs unless Brett Favre comes to the rescue and restructures his contract dramatically

How do you figure?! We have SO much cap room..No one needs to restructure any contract in order for us to take on that contract..

Its been reported that Randy Moss desires to be a winner again.
That would rule out the Packers in 2007 and what appears longer.
[/quote]
What makes you think the Pack cannot be a winning team on '07?! Because they lost Ahman Green?! He was OK last year, but we can easily replace his production...Our rookies from last year will be a year older..There's no reason to think that we can't improve on last season's .500 record..

[Pacopete4]

how bout everyone just chills.. for those of you spazing that people are talking about him coming.. relax cuz guess what.. KNOW ONE KNOWS!!!!!!! KNOW ONE!!.. BlueBrewer, shut up. You dont know hes not coming.. you giving us ur opinions on why hes not coming is the exact same as us giving u opinions why he is coming.. so its a draw.. now everyone have fun with the fact that Favre could possible get a WR with as much talent as Sterling Sharpe..

[BlueBrewer]

how bout everyone just chills.. for those of you spazing that people are talking about him coming.. relax cuz guess what.. KNOW ONE KNOWS!!!!!!! KNOW ONE!!.. BlueBrewer, shut up. You dont know hes not coming.. you giving us ur opinions on why hes not coming is the exact same as us giving u opinions why he is coming.. so its a draw.. now everyone have fun with the fact that Favre could possible get a WR with as much talent as Sterling Sharpe..

Ok, so I really don't have definitive proof, but I have just as much a right to say hes not coming. So shove your all caps and exclamation marks up your ass and don't tell me to shut up. And if you are really that hot over this I'll meet you half way in Gordon and we can settle this like men and then have a beer together.

[imscott72]

LOL, its hard to even come in here and read posts anymore. Woodbuck and his constant negativity. Hey Woodbuck, you never did share with us how you'd run the team by the way..People absolutely freaking out on a daily basis because we haven't spent all of our cap room already. Take it easy people, take some meds for goodness sakes..lol, stress kills...If we get Moss, we get Moss. If we don't we don't...Somethin tells me there will still be football next season in Green Bay...

[BlueBrewer]

[quote="imscott72"]LOL, its hard to even come in here and read posts anymore. Woodbuck and his constant negativity. Hey Woodbuck, you never did share with us how you'd run the team by the way..People absolutely freaking out on a daily basis because we haven't spent all of our cap room already. Take it easy people, take some meds for goodness sakes..lol, stress kills...If we get Moss, we get Moss. If we don't we don't...Somethin tells me there will still be football next season in Green Bay...


Fine you win. I'll settle down.

[imscott72]

[quote="BlueBrewer"]

LOL, its hard to even come in here and read posts anymore. Woodbuck and his constant negativity. Hey Woodbuck, you never did share with us how you'd run the team by the way..People absolutely freaking out on a daily basis because we haven't spent all of our cap room already. Take it easy people, take some meds for goodness sakes..lol, stress kills...If we get Moss, we get Moss. If we don't we don't...Somethin tells me there will still be football next season in Green Bay...


Fine you win. I'll settle down.

lol, thats better...I can sense your stress levels dropping already...

[woodbuck27]

We can't afford Randy Moss's contract needs unless Brett Favre comes to the rescue and restructures his contract dramatically

How do you figure?! We have SO much cap room..No one needs to restructure any contract in order for us to take on that contract..

Its been reported that Randy Moss desires to be a winner again.
That would rule out the Packers in 2007 and what appears longer.

What makes you think the Pack cannot be a winning team on '07?! Because they lost Ahman Green?! He was OK last year, but we can easily replace his production...Our rookies from last year will be a year older..There's no reason to think that we can't improve on last season's .500 record..[/quote]

Good day BF4MVP:

Did you factor in the fact that Ted Thompson may extend Nick Barnett this season and the cost of that at around the $6 Million range per season? See the end of this post.

Add to that the cost of a player like J. Griffith at $4 million per season.

Now $23 million under the CAP minus $10 million equals $13 million.

The cost to sign the Rookie crop equals about $8 million. That leaves about $5 million to bring in Randy Moss and that won't cut it.

Now I refer you to the scenario where possibly Brett Favre could restructure his contract to free up money, as it's been reported that he has in the past. ie See Cletidus Hunt.

It's my feeling YES, that the loss of Ahman Green has weakened an already weak Packer running game. Are OUR options in free agency and in the draft ripe to improve that? That now appears difficult this season.

Again, the cost of bringing in a reliable free agent Vs the reality he will be productive. Again, money that isn't really there based on Ted Thompson's plans.

Ahman contributed around 1300 yards of offense in 2006 and to say that any of OUR existing RB's will duplicate Ahman's output (easily) in 2007, is speculation.

A real chance to improve on 8-8 and make the playoff's in 2007 is further burdened by a tougher schedule in 2007 and ' the reality ' we can't add playmakers due to money restrictions (again) in FA.

The consolation is a higher draft pick but that's not enough.

The Green Bay Packers players have to be scrupulously evaluated for cost Vs talent (contribution) to enable an upgrade of OUR team and it's future.The deadwood has to be cut.

Rookies being into their second season in no way offers a gurantee that they will grow to contribute more in regards to big plays.We often make reference to the sophmore jinx ie FS Nick Collins last season.Opposed to that we certainly hope that another off season program, will make OUR second and third year ofensive lineman stronger.That does support a better running game.

That again is offset by losing the talent of an Ahman Green.

[woodbuck27]

LOL, its hard to even come in here and read posts anymore. Woodbuck and his constant negativity. Hey Woodbuck, you never did share with us how you'd run the team by the way..People absolutely freaking out on a daily basis because we haven't spent all of our cap room already. Take it easy people, take some meds for goodness sakes..lol, stress kills...If we get Moss, we get Moss. If we don't we don't...Somethin tells me there will still be football next season in Green Bay...

I am not about constant negativity Man.

It appears a moi that 'in fact' it may be YOU that needs to take a pill, LOL.

Your the man 'on point' arn't YOU. Be fair Packer fan.

Some that I post may be tongue in cheek. Do we have to be serious all the time?

If I'm called upon seriously to back up my position I do just that with the facts and reasoning based on possible scenarios. Again, merley based upon what I can garner as a fan.

I read as much as possible to stay on top of it all. It's not as if I'm in here to just spout off to annoy posters.

imscott72:

If I'm so annoying to YOU, then please simply ignore my posts. I won't feel insulted with that result.