Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Doesn't sound like a rumor anymore...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Doesn't sound like a rumor anymore...

    Moss: Deal, or no deal?
    GM to outline plan to acquire receiver
    By BOB McGINN
    bmcginn@journalsentinel.com
    Posted: March 13, 2007

    Green Bay - At some point this morning, Ted Thompson will make his monthly presentation to his bosses at the Green Bay Packers and the subject of his keen interest in acquiring Oakland wide receiver Randy Moss undoubtedly will top the agenda.

    At that time, chairman of the board Bob Harlan, President John Jones and six members of the executive committee will hear details from Thompson regarding his plan to add Moss, and the general manager will learn what management has to say about the raging debate in Packer Nation.

    "Ted has not spent a lot of time talking to me about it, quite honestly," Harlan said Monday. "Ted always starts out our meetings with a football report so he may get into that."

    Sources have said the two teams have been discussing Moss for more than a month. On Monday, a source familiar with the inner workings of both organizations said Thompson had spoken directly with Raiders owner Al Davis about dealing for Moss.

    "They're going to get rid of him," the source said. "I think they think they can trade him. And I know Green Bay has interest."

    Thompson refuses to discuss Moss, and Davis always operates under a veil of secrecy. Tim DiPiero, the agent for Moss, was unavailable for comment.

    But the source said he was confident that Packers negotiator Andrew Brandt, with permission from Davis, already had had preliminary talks to restructure Moss' remaining base salaries of $9.75 million in 2007 and $11.25 million in '08.

    Davis is 77 and struggles to walk, but Raiders employees maintain that he remains as competitive as ever. If Thompson is passionate about anything, it would be holding on to his draft choices.

    It's possible that the two sides might not agree on compensation until summer, if at all, with Davis holding out for at least a second-round pick to save face and Thompson hoping he'll just waive Moss and gain a reported $8 million in cap space.

    "But Al is stubborn," one source said. "He might hang on to the guy and tell the new coach (Lane Kiffin) just to go (expletive) coach him."

    In the end, Thompson might part with a middle-round choice for the 30-year-old Moss, a devastating deep threat for seven seasons in Minnesota but a dud in Oakland for the last two.

    If the Packers were to offer a player, the source said the Raiders wouldn't have any interest in quarterback Aaron Rodgers but indicated that defensive end Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila or defensive tackle Corey Williams might have considerable appeal to them. The Packers insist Rodgers isn't available, anyway.

    Despite acquiring wide receivers Donte' Stallworth, Kelley Washington and Wes Welker in the last week, New England admires Moss and still might take him, one source said. Tampa Bay also has interest but probably only if it can't select Georgia Tech's Calvin Johnson with the No. 4 pick.

    Today in the board room, Thompson will find out whether the men who run the franchise can stomach having Moss on the team. In fairness to Thompson, Harlan said he didn't know yet if the opposition to Moss would preclude a match being made.

    "I've told Ted about the calls I've gotten but I haven't talked to him since Fan Fest ended or what happened today," said Harlan, who had just finished fielding five more calls on Moss.

    "When it first started as a rumor, Ted came in to see me. I told him, 'I don't know what you're thinking about Randy Moss but I've got to let you know that the initial response I'm getting is not good.' It has settled down a little bit since then. I'd say it's been maybe 65-35% anti."

    On Monday, Harlan shared the contents of a fax and phone call that summarized the no-Moss sentiment.

    "One man wrote, 'Moody. Excess baggage. Disruptive. Do any of these words sound like alarm bells to you?' " Harlan said. "One guy called from out of state and said, 'Bob, I'd rather see you go 0-16 than do that.' Isn't that something?

    "They're very passionate about it. A lot of it probably is the mooning thing. They just won't forgive him for doing that."

    Other fans equate the situation to the '96 waiver pickup of character risk Andre Rison, a late-season starter on the Super Bowl team.

    "People say to me, 'Brett (Favre) needs a big target. I know he's got baggage but he's never hurt anybody,' " Harlan said. "Today, they were all, 'Take a chance.' "

    With Harlan ready to retire in late May, he vividly recalls the scandalous trials of the 1980s involving Mossy Cade and James Lofton.

    "We've always talked about the public-relations image of the franchise and the class image of the franchise," Harlan said. "Those are important things to me, very important things to me.

    "Ron Wolf was looking at a draft pick with baggage one year and he said, 'Where do you hide him in Green Bay?' And I said, 'You don't.' "

  • #2
    Bob McGinn wrote the earlier article at MJS.

    So much of this is coming from McGinn and his one source.
    Who is this source?
    "Thompson refuses to discuss Moss, and Davis always operates under a veil of secrecy. Tim DiPiero(crack addict), the agent for Moss, was unavailable for comment."

    Who has been putting out the Packers, Patriots, Bucaneers interest rumors?

    This article explains that it is just a monthly meeting of Ted Thompson with Bob Harlan.

    Will Harlan read the riot act to Thompson?

    No, the whole Randy Moss debate is overblown.

    If straightforward deals with free agents haven't happened, throw in some more monkey wrenches:

    1) High salary
    2) Trade
    3) Al Davis is no softie negotiator
    4) Moss ego
    5) Ted is frugal
    6) Ted likes draft picks.

    Sure makes a Barnett extension look a lot easier.

    Conditions would change if Moss is cut by the Raiders after June 1st.
    or they Packers draft a good receiver.

    There are just too many things that would mess up a deal if it were wanted in the first place.

    Comment


    • #3
      On TMJ this morning they were suggesting that a number of polling methods were actually running in favor of aquiring Moss, somewhat contrary to the information that Harlan has been getting about the feelings of the Packer nation.

      I guess people are more likely to holler, "Hey Harlan! Keep that g.d. Moss away from my Packers!" across the grocery store parking lot than something reasonable and supportive.

      Reasonable arguments for aquiring controversial yet talented players don't project effectively when hollered as Harlan rolls by.

      "Screw Moss!" sympathies communicate well in two syllables.
      [QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.

      Comment


      • #4
        Harlan has all but confirmed this by commenting publicly. He may be trying to break the news slowly so there isn't a giant backlash at once after the announcement.

        I don't think this is a good idea. PFT had a Harlan quote that mentioned someone telling him, "its not like he ever hurt anybody". Which means our standards are a bit low now.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think the best way to get this done is to get rid of KGB it saves us money. It would be much easier to sell to the public than giving up a second or in my opinion third is even too much. I guess you could give up williams and a fifth, but with all our holes to fill we can't afford a high draft pick. As far as his salary is concerned I would give him all his guarenteed money this year and make it like Woodsen and Harris' play to get paid money in the future if he is producing he gets good money if not he's gone.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by pbmax
            Harlan has all but confirmed this by commenting publicly. He may be trying to break the news slowly so there isn't a giant backlash at once after the announcement.

            I don't think this is a good idea. PFT had a Harlan quote that mentioned someone telling him, "its not like he ever hurt anybody". Which means our standards are a bit low now.
            I don't like the thought of lowering our standards either but what other impact player is left unless someone cuts a big name player that isn''t 36 years old? I just can't see us going into the draft filling RB,WR,TE,Safety,Nickelback,FB and back-up O-linemen all in the same draft. I realize it is only one position but it is better than none and maybe it lets us get by without the TE need.

            Comment


            • #7
              Not so fast on the crack addict label:

              from PFT:
              Di Trapano originally was arrested in March on drug charges in Florida. Moss initially said that he'd stand behind his agent, but several weeks later he quietly dropped di Trapano from a representation team that includes his former law partner, Tim DiPiero.
              Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
              Bob McGinn wrote the earlier article at MJS.

              So much of this is coming from McGinn and his one source.
              Who is this source?
              "Thompson refuses to discuss Moss, and Davis always operates under a veil of secrecy. Tim DiPiero(crack addict), the agent for Moss, was unavailable for comment."

              Who has been putting out the Packers, Patriots, Bucaneers interest rumors?

              This article explains that it is just a monthly meeting of Ted Thompson with Bob Harlan.

              Will Harlan read the riot act to Thompson?

              No, the whole Randy Moss debate is overblown.

              If straightforward deals with free agents haven't happened, throw in some more monkey wrenches:

              1) High salary
              2) Trade
              3) Al Davis is no softie negotiator
              4) Moss ego
              5) Ted is frugal
              6) Ted likes draft picks.

              Sure makes a Barnett extension look a lot easier.

              Conditions would change if Moss is cut by the Raiders after June 1st.
              or they Packers draft a good receiver.

              There are just too many things that would mess up a deal if it were wanted in the first place.
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #8
                What I would like to know is if Moss even wants to come to GB? We know he wants to go to a contender, but GB isn’t exactly New England knocking on that SB door every year. I would hope if the deal is done that Moss WANTS to be in GB, otherwise he will be like a broken tooth and a foot out of joint.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by pbmax
                  I don't think this is a good idea. PFT had a Harlan quote that mentioned someone telling him, "its not like he ever hurt anybody". Which means our standards are a bit low now.
                  I took it more as "we need to get over ourselves" which is 100% correct. Moss has been a model citizen compared to say, KRob. If the only reason people say no to Moss is because of the mooning or all the TDs he scored against the Pack then they are tripping and dont really want to see a winning team.

                  This would be the best upgrade TT could make on offense. It would allow even a medicore RB to find holes in the D due to the double coverage Moss would get.

                  I wonder what DD thinks about all this?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Moss

                    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                    Originally posted by pbmax
                    I don't think this is a good idea. PFT had a Harlan quote that mentioned someone telling him, "its not like he ever hurt anybody". Which means our standards are a bit low now.
                    I took it more as "we need to get over ourselves" which is 100% correct. Moss has been a model citizen compared to say, KRob. If the only reason people say no to Moss is because of the mooning or all the TDs he scored against the Pack then they are tripping and dont really want to see a winning team.

                    This would be the best upgrade TT could make on offense. It would allow even a medicore RB to find holes in the D due to the double coverage Moss would get.

                    I wonder what DD thinks about all this?
                    Mad- problem is that people let there personal feelings for a player take priority over what is best for the team. The ONLY debate in this situation is will he re-stucture and what will it cost to get him. Nothing else matters.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Moss's greatest sin is that he has quit on his teammates on more than one occassion.

                      Terrell Owens is just as much of punk as Moss is, but at least you know he's giving his all on every play.

                      Moss is a primadonna... If he played hard on every play, cared about winning, cared about his teammates??? Then maybe I'd consider him.

                      But given his weak character and his penchant for sulking, pouting, and quitting on his teammates - NO WAY do I want Moss.
                      wist

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        But the source said he was confident that Packers negotiator Andrew Brandt, with permission from Davis, already had had preliminary talks to restructure Moss' remaining base salaries of $9.75 million in 2007 and $11.25 million in '08.
                        Sounds like Moss might be willing to work something out. Love him or hate him it sounds like we better get ready for this to go down.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by wist43
                          If he played hard on every play, cared about winning, cared about his teammates??? Then maybe I'd consider him.
                          Barnett does all of the above and you still dont consider him a worthy starter.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I gave up on caring. I don't want him.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                              Originally posted by wist43
                              If he played hard on every play, cared about winning, cared about his teammates??? Then maybe I'd consider him.
                              Barnett does all of the above and you still dont consider him a worthy starter.
                              In Wists defense, meeting those standards != a good player. Good player should meet those standards, though.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X