Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Couple things I like about the Hawk pick....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Couple things I like about the Hawk pick....

    ...Even though I'd rather have Vernon Davis..

    1. He's a leader..He's gonna do his job and get others to do their job too..

    2. He could become a perennial pro-bowler..We may even have our own Urlacher, who knows..I choose not to believe he's that good, but who knows..The draft is a crap chute..

    3. TT says fans will love him cuz "he's all football."

    4. Laura Quinn!!!!!!!!!!

    5. Passing on the slipping Leinart in favor of Hawk showed that the Packers have faith in mah boy Rodgers.

    Here's hopin Hawk becomes just amazing...If Shawne Merriman can make the pro bowl in his rookie year, then so can AJ right?

  • #2
    Nice to see you back, BF.
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks Harv..Nice to see you still here..

      Comment


      • #4
        At least your smart enough to come around.

        Comment


        • #5
          Harv lined up Urlachers athletic measurables vs Hawks and I liked Hawks just a litte more.

          They are the same speed but Hawk was more explosive. I think Hawk could be as good as Urlacher. Acctually, I think he should be as good as Urlacher.

          This is the most exciteing day since the Philly game as a Packer fan. I would be surprised if the Packers had a losing season. They just added a top level play maker and Favre came back.
          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

          Comment


          • #6
            Urlacher is 6'4" 258lbs, played S in college and is quick as hell.

            Hawk is 6'1" 247 lbs and slow as a turtle. I dont care is his 40 is 4.73, that is slow.

            Hawk isnt anything but the next Dat Nguyen. Mark my words on it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear
              Urlacher is 6'4" 258lbs, played S in college and is quick as hell.

              Hawk is 6'1" 247 lbs and slow as a turtle. I dont care is his 40 is 4.73, that is slow.

              Hawk isnt anything but the next Dat Nguyen. Mark my words on it.
              Tank,

              Why don't you look up Hawk's numbers so you are remotely in the balllpark. He is NOT a slow LB.
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • #8
                at some point, everyone will just ignore Tank cause of his out of reality comments.
                "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hawk ran a 4.36 at his pro day I thought..Could be mistaken..

                  I don't think he's THAT fast, cuz I think those pro day times are somehow skewed in favor of the players..But he's still a fast LB and hits hard...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bretsky


                    Tank,

                    Why don't you look up Hawk's numbers so you are remotely in the balllpark. He is NOT a slow LB.
                    No need to do that. Watched his highlight film, and the guy is not even on par with Greenway. In fact, if you want to compare any one from this draft with Urlacher, Greenway is it.

                    Greenway: better coverage ablity, plays faster, hits harder.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I don't know about you guys, but I'm kind of relieved that Tank think the pick sucks.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by BF4MVP
                        Hawk ran a 4.36 at his pro day I thought..Could be mistaken..

                        I don't think he's THAT fast, cuz I think those pro day times are somehow skewed in favor of the players..But he's still a fast LB and hits hard...
                        If you want a fast lb, think 4.5, not 4.8. Hawk isnt fast and he doesnt play fast. Urlacher may have a slower time, but he plays super fast and super quick.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear
                          Originally posted by Bretsky


                          Tank,

                          Why don't you look up Hawk's numbers so you are remotely in the balllpark. He is NOT a slow LB.
                          No need to do that. Watched his highlight film, and the guy is not even on par with Greenway. In fact, if you want to compare any one from this draft with Urlacher, Greenway is it.

                          Greenway: better coverage ablity, plays faster, hits harder.
                          TANK,
                          YOU ARE SOUNDING WORSE: YOU HAVE YOUR FACTS MIXED UP; HAWK IS A 4.55 GUY
                          TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear
                            Originally posted by BF4MVP
                            Hawk ran a 4.36 at his pro day I thought..Could be mistaken..

                            I don't think he's THAT fast, cuz I think those pro day times are somehow skewed in favor of the players..But he's still a fast LB and hits hard...
                            If you want a fast lb, think 4.5, not 4.8. Hawk isnt fast and he doesnt play fast. Urlacher may have a slower time, but he plays super fast and super quick.
                            ONCE AGAIN RELOOK YOUR NUMBERS. IF 4.5 RANGE IS FAST THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO ADMIT THAT AJ HAWK IS FAST. IS THAT AN ACCURATE STATEMENT ?????????????????
                            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bretsky
                              Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bear
                              Originally posted by Bretsky


                              Tank,

                              Why don't you look up Hawk's numbers so you are remotely in the balllpark. He is NOT a slow LB.
                              No need to do that. Watched his highlight film, and the guy is not even on par with Greenway. In fact, if you want to compare any one from this draft with Urlacher, Greenway is it.

                              Greenway: better coverage ablity, plays faster, hits harder.
                              TANK,
                              YOU ARE SOUNDING WORSE: YOU HAVE YOUR FACTS MIXED UP; HAWK IS A 4.55 GUY
                              What the hell? Last I checked Hawk was running 4.73. According to NFL.com.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X