I was listening to a legal expert who was interviewed on "The Fan" sports station re: Vick's charges.
What surprised me was that legally, Vick faced more serious charges on the gambling part of the dog-fighting. The penalities for the dog-fighting and the cruel disposal of the "Losing" dogs are not as severe as the actual gambling on the fights.
Most of the public has reacted to the dog-fighting and the abusive ways the dogs were treated after the fights. If you asked the "Average citizen" what he(she) thought of Vick's alleged gambling on the dog fights, I bet most would shrug their heads and say, "It's not that big a deal."
What surprised me was that legally, Vick faced more serious charges on the gambling part of the dog-fighting. The penalities for the dog-fighting and the cruel disposal of the "Losing" dogs are not as severe as the actual gambling on the fights.
Most of the public has reacted to the dog-fighting and the abusive ways the dogs were treated after the fights. If you asked the "Average citizen" what he(she) thought of Vick's alleged gambling on the dog fights, I bet most would shrug their heads and say, "It's not that big a deal."


Comment