Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Favre, Thompson, Rogers. The End.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wahle, Rivera coveted; Packers in danger of losing both guards
    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, The, Feb 26, 2005 by BOB McGINN


    Indianapolis A thin crop of free-agent guards, their own tight salary cap and the reputations of Mike Wahle and Marco Rivera have left the Green Bay Packers in danger of losing not just one but both of their starting guards.

    If neither player has a contract with Green Bay by the start of the signing period Wednesday, the Packers can forget about re- signing Wahle and probably will have a much more difficult time re- signing Rivera than they thought originally.

    At 27, Wahle is five years younger than Rivera, but age isn't the only factor making Wahle the more attractive commodity in the eyes of many National Football League teams.

    Despite the fact that Rivera has been voted to the last three Pro Bowls and Wahle has never gone, scouts covet Wahle because of his extraordinary athletic ability and less problematic medical history.

    The Packers have been trying to re-sign Wahle but might be fighting a losing battle. Wahle probably is looking at a signing bonus of $10 million or more once he hits the open market.

    "I really want to stay out of it as far as letting people know what's going on until things happen," Wahle said Friday. "I'm trying not to think about it."

    Green Bay will have to release Wahle by the start of the league year Wednesday because his cap salary for 2005 would be an exorbitant $11.375 million. By doing so, the Packers would gain $11 million in cap room.

    One would think the club could turn around and use that money to re-sign Rivera, especially given the tremendous loyalty he has shown for the organization. But Jimmy Sexton, his new agent, emphatically said loyalty wouldn't preclude Rivera from testing the market for the first time in his career as an unrestricted free agent.

    "Having said that, he likes it in Green Bay a lot," Sexton said. "But just because you like it somewhere doesn't mean you don't look. You have to look."

    Rivera parted ways with Ralph Cindrich, his prominent Pittsburgh- based agent for his entire 10-year career, shortly after the season ended. Cindrich said he made one final attempt at negotiating a deal for Rivera late in the season.

    One source said one reason why Rivera selected Sexton was his track record for successfully negotiating contracts with Packers management, including vice president Andrew Brandt. Among Sexton's clients over the years were Reggie White, Harry Galbreath, Cletidus Hunt and Chad Clifton.

    Also, it was Sexton who landed guard Randy Thomas a seven-year, $28 million free-agent contract from Washington in March 2003 that contained a $7 million signing bonus.

    "We're in constant communication but neither side has sort of laid a deal on the table yet," Sexton said at the combine. "We'll do that in the next few days here."

    If cut, Wahle would head the list of available guards.
    Despite being 32 with bad knees, Rivera might be No. 2 over Philadelphia's Jermane Mayberry, New England's Joe Andruzzi, former Denver Bronco Dan Neil and Pittsburgh's Keydrick Vincent.

    Although some scouts have tossed about the possibility of a $3 million to $5 million signing bonus, it could be substantially higher if several teams join the bidding. Last year, the unrestricted guard market included Damien Woody getting a $9 million signing bonus from Detroit, Jeno James getting a $4.25 million bonus from Miami, Mike Goff getting a $3.5 million bonus from San Diego and Chris Villarrial getting a $2.875 million bonus from Buffalo.

    "He's clearly the leader of that offensive line from an emotional, spiritual, however you want to say it standpoint," Sexton said about Rivera. "I think those guys are hard to come by. I think that's where he has value to teams in the league. I think teams that feel like they have a window in the next three to four years will be interested in a guy like him."

    How did the Packers get into such an untenable situation with Wahle in the first place?

    Early in the unrestricted signing period in March 2003, Wahle turned down an offer to play right tackle for Kansas City and signed a six-year, $18.4 million deal with the Packers. The deal looked good on paper for the agent, but in reality it was a three-year, $7.5 million deal because in 2005 his base salary skyrocketed to $5 million in addition to a $6 million roster bonus.

    If the Packers had been willing to give Wahle more than $2.25 million in signing bonus at the time, the deal wouldn't have had the drop-dead point of March 2005. The team basically had Wahle at a reasonable rate for the last three seasons but always looming in the distance was the inevitable release of an outstanding player.

    Barring unexpected events, that sad day for the Packers will arrive Wednesday.

    Copyright 2005, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved. (Note: This notice does not apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through wire services or other media.)



    Kinda blows my argument all to shit doesn't it. Still if they were $20Million over the cap in 2001 and were able to pull it off........maybe.

    Comment


    • I can't find it B. You got a link?
      Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bretsky
        A while back you stated quite clearly 9-7 was the mark
        I "expect" the Packers to win the division. It's been 3 years. That doesn't mean that I think it will happen. It means I'll be dissapointed if we don't.

        If we don't win the division, I'll be less likely to cut Ted slack. I may not be ready to fire him for a new guy. But I'll be wondering if Ted is the answer.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Bretsky
          Originally posted by Scott Campbell
          Originally posted by Bretsky
          Cliff Cristl believed in the star theory and said you just can't let your stars get away. He classified Wahle and Javon Walker as stars.

          I don't buy Wahle, or any guard as a star. I just don't. Hutchinson is a better guard than Wahle and he wasn't much of a difference maker in Minny.

          Hmm; I won't argue Hutchinson hasn't had much of an impact yet. I do think he's better, but I think they are in the same quality of player. Wahle was in his prime and one of the top OG's in the game when he left. I think he still is

          I like Wahle, and think he's a terrific player - same zip code as Hutch. But I don't think you can build your team around a guard the way you can around a stud RB, WR or QB. So I understand wanting to save that money for the difference making positions.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JustinHarrell
            I can't find it B. You got a link?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by JustinHarrell
              I can't find it B. You got a link?
              OK, I'll go hunting again; last time only took me 20 minutes

              If you haven't noticed, any time a pro TT person gives any fair level of success to be measured by I tend to pay special attention.
              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Bretsky
                Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                I can't find it B. You got a link?
                OK, I'll go hunting again; last time only took me 20 minutes

                If you haven't noticed, any time a pro TT person gives any fair level of success to be measured by I tend to pay special attention.

                I think I've been very consistent on my requirments of the team this year. Win the division. As Tank used to say "check my archives".

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                  I like Wahle, and think he's a terrific player - same zip code as Hutch. But I don't think you can build your team around a guard the way you can around a stud RB, WR or QB. So I understand wanting to save that money for the difference making positions.
                  I understand what your saying. I just never forgave Thompson for going into the 2005 season with that O-line. I hate bringing it up, but he himself admitted that it was probably his biggest mistake. I was pissed off watching Brett Favre, our HOF QB, having to scramble and run for his life. I have a hard time believing that Thompson couldn't have done something differently to make that O-line better.

                  Comment


                  • GM's make mistakes. It's sort of part of the gig just like QB's throw INT's. I try to judge him on the whole picture rather than the three mistakes, sort of the same way you judge Favre.

                    You have fun with it though and people get into with with you, arguing details of which you usually have the upper hand. You have the exact personality of the hacker. I could care less if you are, but there is a clear reminance that we've seen before. You're personality is eerily familiar.
                    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                      GM's make mistakes. It's sort of part of the gig just like QB's throw INT's. I try to judge him on the whole picture rather than the three mistakes, sort of the same way you judge Favre.

                      You have fun with it though and people get into with with you, arguing details of which you usually have the upper hand. You have the exact personality of the hacker. I could care less if you are, but there is a clear reminance that we've seen before. You're personality is eerily familiar.
                      Those that don't like TT = Hackers????

                      ...come to think of it, I always wondered about Bretsky. :P

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Bretsky
                        Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                        I can't find it B. You got a link?
                        OK, I'll go hunting again; last time only took me 20 minutes

                        If you haven't noticed, any time a pro TT person gives any fair level of success to be measured by I tend to pay special attention.



                        HERE IS OUR OLD EXCHANGE; WAY BACK FROM MAY

                        JustinHarrell wrote:
                        Also, 8-8 is average so that is a C grade; hardly an F where ever you went to school.

                        I want the team to be better than last year. 8-8 is minimum for me to not be disappointed. As far as it being a success, I want 9 wins.



                        Justin,

                        While I don't consider you an extreme Turtle apologist, you are a strong Snapper supporter. I wanted to point out that I have the utmost respect for the fact that you are willing to state your view and give some parameters to judge TT by.

                        You have stated a few times that for next year to be successful you want to see improvement in the record and if you don't see that you will begin to see the dark side with me.

                        What I don't get it those who want to give TT a free pass. Blind faith and no parameters whatsoever from which to judge him by. We can debate whether or not individuals improve forever, but it's TT's job to go forward to field a winning team. It's frickin time to make the playoffs. That simple

                        I do take into account the harder schedule, but I also take into account that GB had more money than 27 other teams entering free agency. It's Ted's decision how to spend it...via free agency or signing his own....but that fiscal flexibility to improve at least evens out the tougher schedule IMO.

                        He is accountable; he needs to also show accountability and that boils back to wins losses. His free passes should be over.

                        I hope he is making all the correct decisions for this team to become a contender.
                        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                        Comment


                        • Something about the tone. Has nothing to do with TT.
                          Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                          Comment


                          • I'll be disappointed with 7-9 and consider it a success with 9-7. 8-8 is a draw. I never really painted myself in a corner. I'll be disappointed with 7-9 as a fan but if there is a ton of injuries I won't blame it on TT. You set the parameters as they relate to TT in the rigid ways you view them, not me

                            Being disappointed in the season and hanging the GM out to dry are two different things. I did say many times that if this team is clearly not improving by now I'll jump off. Clearly not improving can be a part of a 7-9 record but it's not as rigid as you want to make it.
                            Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                              Originally posted by Bretsky
                              Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                              I can't find it B. You got a link?
                              OK, I'll go hunting again; last time only took me 20 minutes

                              If you haven't noticed, any time a pro TT person gives any fair level of success to be measured by I tend to pay special attention.

                              I think I've been very consistent on my requirments of the team this year. Win the division. As Tank used to say "check my archives".


                              You've been quite upfront; I'm not sure you fall into the TT at all costs group. Many are in the wait and see group to different extremes. You may have a pro bias, but you are definitely in the wait and see group.

                              I think you are a bit harsh though; GB is not as good as the Bears. I'd be fine with an improved record or wildcard. In a sad NFC, 9 wins will probably get us to the playoffs.
                              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by GrnBay007
                                Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                                GM's make mistakes. It's sort of part of the gig just like QB's throw INT's. I try to judge him on the whole picture rather than the three mistakes, sort of the same way you judge Favre.

                                You have fun with it though and people get into with with you, arguing details of which you usually have the upper hand. You have the exact personality of the hacker. I could care less if you are, but there is a clear reminance that we've seen before. You're personality is eerily familiar.
                                Those that don't like TT = Hackers????

                                ...come to think of it, I always wondered about Bretsky. :P

                                Now just because we like the same porn sites doesn't mean I've attached a trojan virus to your PC and watch the videos with you

                                If only I wasn't a PC idiot I could be a hacker
                                TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X