Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thompson Sucks!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    You two can kiss and make up over pm if you want.

    Comment


    • #17
      bahahaha you dont see this team winning consitant games? Shyt we won three in a row over playoff teams from last year. We are ahead in the division and our pass offense looks GREAT. This team reminds me of the early 90's when we used the pass to set up the run.
      Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

      Comment


      • #18
        God, I hate admitting I'm wrong. Maybe TT isn't as bad as I thought.

        Comment


        • #19
          I am not an Orrin Thompson fan. Never have been.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by MJZiggy
            I thought you might like a little dinner...you can share if you'd like, there's lots to be served.

            Mmmm good....What's the green stuff?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by esoxx
              I am not an Orrin Thompson fan. Never have been.
              Other than his immediate family, does Orrin Thompson have fans?
              </delurk>

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Thompson Sucks!!!

                Originally posted by PackerBlues
                Packers sitting alone now at the top of the NFC North!!!
                Sitting on top of the entire NFC. Alone....if the Cowboys lose.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Tony Oday
                  This team reminds me of the early 90's when we used the pass to set up the run.
                  I've read this theory several times, just curious: who were the running backs that made this work? Holmgren came in 93, If i recall.

                  well, they go the pass down, but the "set up the run" ain't happenin yet.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Holmgren came in 92. I think we had the likes of Reggie Cobb and Raymont Harris. Edgar came in 92, but played FB for 2-3 years. Levens started out as a FB also.
                    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I think Dorsey Levens was the first to bring them any real running success, and not until the superbowl year.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        1992
                        Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
                        +----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
                        | Edgar Bennett | 16 | 61 214 3.5 0 | 13 93 7.2 0 |
                        | Buford McGee | 4 | 8 19 2.4 0 | 6 60 10.0 0 |
                        | Harry Sydney | 16 | 51 163 3.2 2 | 49 384 7.8 1 |
                        | Darrell Thompson | 7 | 76 254 3.3 2 | 13 129 9.9 1 |
                        | Vince Workman | 10 | 159 631 4.0 2 | 47 290 6.2 0

                        1993
                        Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
                        +----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
                        | Edgar Bennett | 16 | 159 550 3.5 9 | 59 457 7.7 1 |
                        | John Stephens | 5 | 48 173 3.6 1 | 5 31 6.2 0 |
                        | Darrell Thompson | 16 | 169 654 3.9 3 | 18 129 7.2 0

                        1994
                        ame | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
                        +----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
                        | Edgar Bennett | 16 | 178 623 3.5 5 | 78 546 7.0 4 |
                        | Reggie Cobb | 16 | 153 579 3.8 3 | 35 299 8.5 1 |
                        | LeShon Johnson | 12 | 26 99 3.8 0 | 13 168 12.9 0 |
                        | Dorsey Levens | 14 | 5 15 3.0 0 | 1 9 9.0 0 |
                        | Darrell Thompson | 8 | 2 -2 -1.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0

                        1995
                        Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
                        +----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
                        | Edgar Bennett | 16 | 316 1067 3.4 3 | 61 648 10.6 4 |
                        | William Henderson | 15 | 7 35 5.0 0 | 3 21 7.0 0 |
                        | Travis Jervey | 16 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
                        | LeShon Johnson | 2 | 2 -2 -1.0 0 | 0 0 0.0 0 |
                        | Dorsey Levens | 15 | 36 120 3.3 3 | 48 434 9.0 4
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          thanks for stats.

                          ya, pretty sucky, really.

                          Levens & Bennett finally clocked-in with good yards-per-carry in 96, I was looking at their stats a sec ago.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            So that would give you:

                            1992: Worman
                            1993: Thompson/Bennett
                            1994: Bennett/Cobb
                            1995: Bennett/Levens(barely)
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Tony Oday
                              bahahaha you dont see this team winning consitant games? Shyt we won three in a row over playoff teams from last year. We are ahead in the division and our pass offense looks GREAT. This team reminds me of the early 90's when we used the pass to set up the run.
                              One of those teams is a shell of its former self, the other two aren't yet hitting on all cylinders, and still the games against Philly and SD were close and could've gone either way. I'm impressed with how GB has played so far, and especially with how they've finished games. But I don't think we've seen them against a team that's playing really well. And I'll be even more surprised if they can carry over what they've done in the first three to the last thirteen. I like what they've shown so far, and I like TT's approach, but I don't think they're quite there yet.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Had SD won, it would have been said that SD is back. We beat them and Rivers had a near perfect day. I don't buy the bullshit about how SD is not "hitting on all cylinders".
                                All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X