Obama's Theocratic Socialist Agenda

[texaspackerbacker]

You just have to go point by point and compare Obama's positions with Dennis Kusinich and see that he has positioned himself (more or less) in the center. What he really believes is subject to speculation because of his short record.

Most dramatically: Obama never voted to withhold funding for the Iraq War, as real anti-war politicians did. (well, except for a ridiculous, symbolic vote in spring of 07 that all Dem candidates went along with.)

Obama opposes a single-payer health care system.

(Ya know, the more I list these points, maybe I should write-in Kusinich!)

Gosh, he's not as far left as Dennis Kucinich. Whoopteedo!

If leftist extremism is salt, and if most Dem/libs are as salty as the ocean, Obama is the Great Salt Lake--and Kucinich is the Dead Sea.

As for your other two examples, he was in presidentail candidate mode by then--trying to sweep the horrors of his past leftist positions under the rug.

Obama's healthcare stance may actually be more costly and allow for less freedom than Hillary-care, if that's possible.

[Harlan Huckleby]

http://rofasix.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-un-tax.html

yea, I'm nutty. I was wrong, its not a sales tax, its a GNP tax.

The bill is co-sponsored by Chuck Hagel, a GOP fiscal conservative.

I don't have enough interest in the topic to research it, but I greatly doubt the figures that you quoted about the burden to placed on individual familes. What you have talked about sounds insane, it would never get through congress.

[Harlan Huckleby]

As for your other two examples, he was in presidentail candidate mode by then--trying to sweep the horrors of his past leftist positions under the rug.

Was he in the hills surrounding Havana, fighting with Che? Or was he more a Khmer Rouge type?

I agree that his whole campaign, all his positons are pure marketing. But he really doesn't have a "past", I'd feel better about the guy if he had a past. Hillary Clinton's campaign positions are equally empty of content, it's all tuning to polls and focus groups. But at least she's been around long enough that I have a sense of what she is about.

[texaspackerbacker]

I don't think he was born when Che was in the Cuban hills, And he would have to have been in the infantry for the Khmer Rouge--get it? INFANT ?

However, I wouldn't rule out having him take a little field trip from his Indonesian radical Muslim Madrasa to Osama's al Qaeda training camps in pre-war Afghanistan.

I also wouldn't rule out his supposed father being a surrogate for his REAL procreator--that old dark angel himself, Lucifer. The anti-Christ is overdue, you know. Do you remember Jeanne Dixon implying that he would be born in 1962?

Oh yeah, of course I'm kidding .......

[bobblehead]

http://rofasix.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-un-tax.html

yea, I'm nutty. I was wrong, its not a sales tax, its a GNP tax.

The bill is co-sponsored by Chuck Hagel, a GOP fiscal conservative.

I don't have enough interest in the topic to research it, but I greatly doubt the figures that you quoted about the burden to placed on individual familes. What you have talked about sounds insane, it would never get through congress.

Hagel's voting is all over the map, but one consistent is means testing...in other words, those who took care of their money have to pay for stuff that those who didn't get for free. He is also radically prolife. Other than those two issues he has voted fiscal conservative and liberal at times.

Here is more on the obama-hagel bill(admittedly from a conservative source, but facts are facts): (also, i didn't mention hagel, cuz this is a thread on obama, I won't be voting for chuck either).
================================================


What the media is NOT telling you is that Barack Hussein Obama does, in fact, have a legislative record in the Senate and one of his proudest accomplishments is The Global Poverty Act (S. 2433).

But wait just a minute! Isn't combating poverty around the world a noble goal?

Well... the devil, as they say, is in the details!

Some conservative leaders are already sounding the alarm and telling us that, if passed, Barack Hussein Obama's Global Poverty Act will commit us to a stealth United Nations-inspired global tax of $845 Billion dollars... that comes to approximately an $8500.00 tax burden for every household in the United States!

Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media wrote:

"[T]he legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which... would amount to $845 billion 'over and above what the U.S. already spends.'"

"The plan passed the House in 2007 'because most members didn't realize what was in it.' Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require."

Remember the Food for Oil Scandal? Let's face it; the United Nation's actual record on ending pain and suffering around the world is pathetic and dismal.

The questions to ask are, first, how much of our money that goes to the United Nations right now actually winds up lining the pockets of third-world dictators and despots? And, second, if Obama's plan succeeds, how much of his new $845 billion giveaway will end up in those same pockets?

Barack Hussein Obama's Global Poverty Act MUST be STOPPED! Time is of the essence! Obama's Global Poverty Act actually has the support of some prominent RINOs such as Senator Richard Lugar and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, who just pushed Obama's world welfare bill out of committee. It could be up for a vote in the Senate AT ANY TIME!

Barack Hussein Obama MUST be stopped. But more importantly, his so-called Global Poverty Act -- which has already passed in the House (because most Members simply didn't know what was in it) and is presently being pushed through the Senate -- MUST be stopped.