My loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Interracial Relationship/Marriage: Are you for or against it
Collapse
X
-
And that's somehow NOT the result of the sick leftist media and entertainment community picturing him that way?Originally posted by MJZiggyMy loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?
He graduated from Yale with a higher GPA than John Kerry. I haven't read much from you disparaging Kerry as stupid.
You wouldn't consider the possibility of Bush just acting folksy and down home as part of the southern/west Texas culture he grew up in?
Clinton was really no more"articulate" than Bush, yet he was liberal enough that the media favored him. Jimmy Carter was a TOTAL IDIOT--still is, really, based on everything he ever said and did. And he had a southern accent too. Why don't you think of him as stupid? Maybe because the media and entertainment community hasn't programmed you that way?What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Too funny. Inarticulate = stupid?Originally posted by MJZiggyMy loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersToo funny. Inarticulate = stupid?Originally posted by MJZiggyMy loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?
Sort of like this thread.
Comment
-
I would bet you 100 million dollars that he crushes you in an IQ test. With that said, review his speeches from his time has Governor and he has shown on record that he is quite capable of public speaking. Many have speculated its all an act. Why he would want to act that way I know not, but I am guessing he is following the advice of someone qualified who did research on his supporters.Originally posted by MJZiggyMy loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?
Bush of 12 years or so ago was just as skilled a speaker as Obama.
Comment
-
It's scary that anyone can vote isnt it?Originally posted by MJZiggyMy loathing of Bush has nothing to do with al Qaida. It has to do with the fact that I hate stupid people. We have a complete inarticulate buffoon running our country and this doesn't bother you?Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967
Comment
-
Tex, blaming the liberal media for uncovering truths is just sheer idiotic. The false accusations and shitty politics of fear that McCarthy was notorious for in the 50's, now that's propaganda.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerPF1, you aren't paying attention. It's all about attitude toward America--assuming you look at things from an AMERICAN perspective. You DO claim to look at things from an AMERICAN perspective, don't you, PF1?
This is similar to the crap the sick leftist media used to put out in the fading days of Soviet Communism. They liked to refer to the slightly less bad Communists as "liberals" and the rottenest holdouts against America as "conservatives". It was all part of the propaganda effort of the media FOR the left and AGAINST conservatism or Americanism.
Of course, ultimately people saw through all that crap and made "liberal" the dirty word that it is.
The bottom line is that all of the major politicians of the left have thrown in with the enemy and made THEIR interests and goals the same as al Qaeda's interests and goals. It began, but certainly not end with Bush-hate.
Opposing bush does not necessary mean that one is pro-al qaeda, and therefore is an anti-American. Providing a safe haven for Nazi scientists after WW2 (operation paper clip), instead of prosecuting them, now that's anti-american.
Comment
-
Venona papers, read them, seems McCarthy wasn't such a nut after all. I hope I'm spelling venona correctly.Originally posted by PackFan#1Tex, blaming the liberal media for uncovering truths is just sheer idiotic. The false accusations and shitty politics of fear that McCarthy was notorious for in the 50's, now that's propaganda.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerPF1, you aren't paying attention. It's all about attitude toward America--assuming you look at things from an AMERICAN perspective. You DO claim to look at things from an AMERICAN perspective, don't you, PF1?
This is similar to the crap the sick leftist media used to put out in the fading days of Soviet Communism. They liked to refer to the slightly less bad Communists as "liberals" and the rottenest holdouts against America as "conservatives". It was all part of the propaganda effort of the media FOR the left and AGAINST conservatism or Americanism.
Of course, ultimately people saw through all that crap and made "liberal" the dirty word that it is.
The bottom line is that all of the major politicians of the left have thrown in with the enemy and made THEIR interests and goals the same as al Qaeda's interests and goals. It began, but certainly not end with Bush-hate.
Opposing bush does not necessary mean that one is pro-al qaeda, and therefore is an anti-American. Providing a safe haven for Nazi scientists after WW2 (operation paper clip), instead of prosecuting them, now that's anti-american.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersDepends on what your definition of Conservatism is, but I see you are doing the old Democratic trick of trying to associate Conservatives/Republicans with racism.Originally posted by GoPackGoConservatism of today is not the same as conservatism of yesterday. Conservatism of yesterday gets that label for a reason.
A Republican ended slavery. A Republican ended Jim Crow. Republican legislators supported the Civil Rights Movement by a greater percentage than Democratic legislators. Look it up. You are associating the ideals of the pre-60s Southern Democrats (Dixiecrats) with Conservatism.
I never called anyone a racist. I said that conservatives of yesterday frowned upon interracial marriages. I think a more accurate description for the conservatives of yesterday would be Segregationist, not racist. I agree, people run with that unfairly. Conservatives aren't and have never been racists.To much of a good thing is an awesome thing

Comment
-
Go watch "Good Night, And Good Luck." It stars George Clooney and....never mind, Clooney is a liberal and anything that comes from a liberal is propaganda.Originally posted by bobbleheadVenona papers, read them, seems McCarthy wasn't such a nut after all. I hope I'm spelling venona correctly.Originally posted by PackFan#1Tex, blaming the liberal media for uncovering truths is just sheer idiotic. The false accusations and shitty politics of fear that McCarthy was notorious for in the 50's, now that's propaganda.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerPF1, you aren't paying attention. It's all about attitude toward America--assuming you look at things from an AMERICAN perspective. You DO claim to look at things from an AMERICAN perspective, don't you, PF1?
This is similar to the crap the sick leftist media used to put out in the fading days of Soviet Communism. They liked to refer to the slightly less bad Communists as "liberals" and the rottenest holdouts against America as "conservatives". It was all part of the propaganda effort of the media FOR the left and AGAINST conservatism or Americanism.
Of course, ultimately people saw through all that crap and made "liberal" the dirty word that it is.
The bottom line is that all of the major politicians of the left have thrown in with the enemy and made THEIR interests and goals the same as al Qaeda's interests and goals. It began, but certainly not end with Bush-hate.
Opposing bush does not necessary mean that one is pro-al qaeda, and therefore is an anti-American. Providing a safe haven for Nazi scientists after WW2 (operation paper clip), instead of prosecuting them, now that's anti-american.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PackFan#1Go watch "Good Night, And Good Luck." It stars George Clooney and....never mind, Clooney is a liberal and anything that comes from a liberal is propaganda.
Has all your political acumen been developed watching films? How bout made for TV movies? Did you learn lots about Liberalism from watching a very special episode of Blossom?
Comment
-
Let me guess? you got all your political acumen from Fox News and the Washington Times?Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by PackFan#1Go watch "Good Night, And Good Luck." It stars George Clooney and....never mind, Clooney is a liberal and anything that comes from a liberal is propaganda.
Has all your political acumen been developed watching films? How bout made for TV movies? Did you learn lots about Liberalism from watching a very special episode of Blossom?
Comment
-
This is more than a little bit puzzling, PF1. Did you get confused and respond to some other post? I see NOTHING in what you wrote that even remotely pertains to what I wrote.Originally posted by PackFan#1Tex, blaming the liberal media for uncovering truths is just sheer idiotic. The false accusations and shitty politics of fear that McCarthy was notorious for in the 50's, now that's propaganda.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerPF1, you aren't paying attention. It's all about attitude toward America--assuming you look at things from an AMERICAN perspective. You DO claim to look at things from an AMERICAN perspective, don't you, PF1?
This is similar to the crap the sick leftist media used to put out in the fading days of Soviet Communism. They liked to refer to the slightly less bad Communists as "liberals" and the rottenest holdouts against America as "conservatives". It was all part of the propaganda effort of the media FOR the left and AGAINST conservatism or Americanism.
Of course, ultimately people saw through all that crap and made "liberal" the dirty word that it is.
The bottom line is that all of the major politicians of the left have thrown in with the enemy and made THEIR interests and goals the same as al Qaeda's interests and goals. It began, but certainly not end with Bush-hate.
Opposing bush does not necessary mean that one is pro-al qaeda, and therefore is an anti-American. Providing a safe haven for Nazi scientists after WW2 (operation paper clip), instead of prosecuting them, now that's anti-american.
BTW, what I said is that the leftists/Dem-libs in America sold their souls when Bush was riding high by making their goals, wishes, interests, etc. EXACTLY THE SAME AS AL QAEDA'S. I refer to defeat of America, death of Americans, harming of our economy, terrorist attacks causing allies to wimp out of the war, etc.--because without a large dose of those evils, our Dem/libs would have been on the outside looking in, regarding political power.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment



Comment