A MAJOR LEFTIST MEDIA ASSHOLE DOES THE COUNTRY A FAVOR

[Tyrone Bigguns]

So when I go off and rant about how rotten the guy was--as a member of and indeed one of the most effective members of that evil institution that is the left-saturated mainstream media, that is why I consider it justified--the harm he did and would have continued to do--INCLUDING the end of American dominance/compassion.

I find it interest how so many conservatives label the media as "leftist" or "liberal" when so much of the media is actually controlled by the right.

Fox News is heavily slanted towards the right.

If you listen to talk radio, most of the hosts range from the conservative right to the radical right such as Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Mike Savage.

Whether he realizes it or not, I believe Texas does not advocate a democracy for America, he supports a totalitarian form of government where the political leaders control the media and where political dissent is squashed.

Your take on Fox is off. You must be a left leaning liberal to have that view of Fox. The rest of the media IS left leaning which includes much larger entities like the 3 TV networks, the rest of radio and their hourly news casts, NPR which you and I pay for ,the rest of cable news, (you mentioned one channel albeit the largest)every major newspaper, magazine (including SI)the USA today and ..where most outlets including internet home pages get their news...the wire services - AP and the like. Your math is fuzzy at best.

Right. The whole media is left leaning, except for the truth sayers at Fox..which are objective.

It is almost impossible for me to believe you can actually say that with a straight face. A network run by Roger Ailes. LOL

Convenient for you to ignore radio.

Finally, stop your complaining about the liberal media. The news divisions are owned by CORPORATIONS. Corporations that want to make money. Obviously, if they continue to operate as they do..they are making money...satisfying their customers...or else they would lose money...and that wouldn't please their corporate masters.

Are you against the free market? If you or anyone else doesn't like what is out there...feel free to start your own websites (oops, convenient for you to ignore the tons of conservative websites), conservative magazines (oops, convenient for you to leave out those), or news networks (oops, convenient for you to either lie about fox, or to ignore other outlets like CBN).

I didnt ignore radio at all, reread the post and if you think of it objectively, you have not had anything else to compare it to in your lifetime because it's been all left leaning for years. So when compared to everything else, it appears right wing. Call Fox right wing if you want but he was off base in attempting to paint a picture of an overall balanced media in this country. How in the world did a do-nothing radical like BHO get his parties nomination in the first place...??

In my lifetime. What are you talking about. There have always been conservative magazines, the Christian Science monitor, etc.

Plenty of conservative talk radio..or bible thumpers on the air.

Appears right wing...right. IT IS RIGHT WING.

BHO: How in the world. Umm, the same way a do-nothing loser like Bush got elected. If you have the ability to be objective..you would ask the same about him. 5 years of being gov in a state that severely limits gubernatorial power hardly qualifies him for being pres..anymore than BHO.

And, at least BHO succeeded in college, law school, etc. The man was successful..as opposed to Bush who never succeed at anything..cept being a minority partner in the Rangers.

Lest you take this as an attack on all repubs..that isn't what i'm saying. Jeb would have been a more qualified candidate..so would about 100 others.

psssssssssst...George Bush isn't running for president.[/quote]

pssssst...try to figure out the analogy. Wow. You are dense.

You asked how BHO could get the nomination...the answer can be found in HOW BUSH GOT THE NOMINATION.

[sheepshead]

As usual it doesn't take long for a liberal to resort to name calling. Your BDS is clouding your judgment, but take comfort in the fact that you're not alone.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

As usual it doesn't take long for a liberal to resort to name calling. Your BDS is clouding your judgment, but take comfort in the fact that you're not alone.

And, as usual, a conservative can't figure out a simple analogy, realizes that he is competely defeated..so decides to make a strawman argument.

Stop posting. You are embarrassing yourself and your fellow conservatives.

P.S. I saved your email. So, unless you want me to embarrass you further..i wouldn't continue to be a hypocrite about name calling.

Game, Set, Match.

[mraynrand]

Qualifications hardly matter. What a candidate believes, what they intend to do, and with whom they surround themselves in the administration matters far more. BHO is essentially a second generation campus radical, a constitutional law professor who argues that empathy for the poor and single moms should be the primary qualification for his Supreme Court nominees. That should tell you everything you need to know about how his 'qualifications' affect his ideology.

[sheepshead]

Bigguns..you're right, I'm just not equipped to argue with a sixth grade education and someone that veers off topic at every reply. But go ahead, have the last word-you win.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Bigguns..you're right, I'm just not equipped to argue with a sixth grade education and someone that veers off topic at every reply. But go ahead, have the last word-you win.

I see you are takin the high road again..i thought you didn't name call?

Sounds more like you don't wanna get embarrassed about that friendly email you sent me.

[sheepshead]

Please post anything and everything if it makes you happy. I don't recall engaging in name calling with you but perhaps I did.

(for your information, your analogy is fucked. Bush was a 2 term Governor of the second largest state in the Union and would be the 15th largest economy in the world. Governors lead and manage and have people reporting to them, lots of people. Senators lead no one and besides their staff, have no one reporting to them. They are litigators. Mr. Obama is one of my Senators. He won virtually unopposed after the Tribune (Libune) smeared his opponent into quitting the race. As Mike Ditka says, "If I would've run, no one would have heard of Barack Obama. He hasn't accomplished a single thing in the Senate that anyone can point to. He has been busy being propped up by Hollywood and the Media as the second coming.)

[MateoInMex]

That's the beauty of a forum like this. Even Hannity has to has to get all nicey nice about leftist trash like Russert. But thanks to that freedom of speech--which if the left had their way, they would curtail, I can tell it like it is.

It isn't only Russert. It is the whole bunch of GOD DAMNED AMERICA-HATING PIECES OF SHIT IN THE SICK LEFT-SATURATED MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT HAS CORRUPTED THE ELECTORATE and put all of the great things in this country INCLUDING freedom of speech and press at risk.

I don't blame most of you criticizing me, as likely, most of you would be similarly critical of some leftist who would be similarly disrespectful of let's say, George W. Bush or Rush Limbaugh or whoever if they died.

The difference, though, as I said, is that Russert and his sick kind REALLY HAVE HARMED THIS COUNTRY SIGNIFICANTLY by subtly corrupting the electorate to support policies and candidates who have damaged and who continue to damage this country.

Packers11 brings up Olberman. Hell yeah, he's every bit as bad as Russert. He, however, doesn't even make a pretense of objectivity. Therefore, he is not near as effective at influencing people/voters in the wrong/anti-American direction. The better comparison is Walter Cronkite, who damn near lost the Cold War for America, and probably DID lose the Vietnam War by his horrendous--but subtle skewing of the electorate.

Dude, you seriously need to get laid!

Why are you in four political forums wasting your time? I will send you $8 dollars to your residence in Texas if you sign a promisary note saying you will cross the border and spend it on an 8 dollar Rodeo Basket F***!!

If you don't go back to Texas with a smile on your face, I will do nothing more than question your sexuality...not that there's anything wrong with that!

You obviously have a lot of hatred built up, I have no idea why. Maybe some liberal diddled you on the playground in Kindergarten, or maybe a "Lefty Wacko" took you to a "legit" massage parlor. I have no clue...but after 5 years of JSONLINE and you joining 3 years later ...everything with you is conspiratorial and hatred. You must be a blast at parties!

Dude. . . live a little!!! This world will still be around when you're gone!!! Have some fun!!! Go explore Anal, take a dive in the funpool of group sex!!! Take the rest of the posting year off and go get laid!!

I gurantee you will thank me for this!!!

Remember my post to you about 3 years ago when you went off on some tagent about "Liberal Scum"?

We're not Watoosie, We're not Spartans, We're Americans...with a capital A!!! (Go Rent STRIPES, buy a 12 pack and relax!!! Your government rants on web forums are useless and have been for years. I'm just trying to help you my little right-wing buddy!

)

[The Leaper]

People that tend to have one thought process and ideals are the conservatives.

So I guess the kind of narrow thinking you just showed in that sentence proves how open minded you are???

Attempting to label all conservatives as one-minded robots is a typical liberal viewpoint...and a dangerously flawed one at that.

[mraynrand]

People that tend to have one thought process and ideals are the conservatives.

So I guess the kind of narrow thinking you just showed in that sentence proves how open minded you are???

Attempting to label all conservatives as one-minded robots is a typical liberal viewpoint...and a dangerously flawed one at that.

"Only the Sith Think in Absolutes"

[Tyrone Bigguns]

People that tend to have one thought process and ideals are the conservatives.

So I guess the kind of narrow thinking you just showed in that sentence proves how open minded you are???

Attempting to label all conservatives as one-minded robots is a typical liberal viewpoint...and a dangerously flawed one at that.

YOu label it narrow thinking..lol. It is generally accepted notion of politics.

Conservs generally agree on econ, social issues, etc. Is there diversity..of course. But, you can't even begin to compare that to the separate factions that exist in the dem party...labor has no relation to eco, etc.

P.S. who ever said robotic. Talk about a leap. Maybe that is how you came to your avatar.

[texaspackerbacker]

That's the beauty of a forum like this. Even Hannity has to has to get all nicey nice about leftist trash like Russert. But thanks to that freedom of speech--which if the left had their way, they would curtail, I can tell it like it is.

It isn't only Russert. It is the whole bunch of GOD DAMNED AMERICA-HATING PIECES OF SHIT IN THE SICK LEFT-SATURATED MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT HAS CORRUPTED THE ELECTORATE and put all of the great things in this country INCLUDING freedom of speech and press at risk.

I don't blame most of you criticizing me, as likely, most of you would be similarly critical of some leftist who would be similarly disrespectful of let's say, George W. Bush or Rush Limbaugh or whoever if they died.

The difference, though, as I said, is that Russert and his sick kind REALLY HAVE HARMED THIS COUNTRY SIGNIFICANTLY by subtly corrupting the electorate to support policies and candidates who have damaged and who continue to damage this country.

Packers11 brings up Olberman. Hell yeah, he's every bit as bad as Russert. He, however, doesn't even make a pretense of objectivity. Therefore, he is not near as effective at influencing people/voters in the wrong/anti-American direction. The better comparison is Walter Cronkite, who damn near lost the Cold War for America, and probably DID lose the Vietnam War by his horrendous--but subtle skewing of the electorate.

Dude, you seriously need to get laid!

Why are you in four political forums wasting your time? I will send you $8 dollars to your residence in Texas if you sign a promisary note saying you will cross the border and spend it on an 8 dollar Rodeo Basket F***!!

If you don't go back to Texas with a smile on your face, I will do nothing more than question your sexuality...not that there's anything wrong with that!

You obviously have a lot of hatred built up, I have no idea why. Maybe some liberal diddled you on the playground in Kindergarten, or maybe a "Lefty Wacko" took you to a "legit" massage parlor. I have no clue...but after 5 years of JSONLINE and you joining 3 years later ...everything with you is conspiratorial and hatred. You must be a blast at parties!

Dude. . . live a little!!! This world will still be around when you're gone!!! Have some fun!!! Go explore Anal, take a dive in the funpool of group sex!!! Take the rest of the posting year off and go get laid!!

I gurantee you will thank me for this!!!

Remember my post to you about 3 years ago when you went off on some tagent about "Liberal Scum"?

We're not Watoosie, We're not Spartans, We're Americans...with a capital A!!! (Go Rent STRIPES, buy a 12 pack and relax!!! Your government rants on web forums are useless and have been for years. I'm just trying to help you my little right-wing buddy!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for your good intentions, Mateo. I'm getting all I need, thanks. Long ago, I crossed that border a couple of times--and came back with the smile you speak of.

What YOU don't seem to understand is that just a half step below sex in the pleasure hierarchy is arguing politics. Hence, the reason I am so thankful for this and other forums.

What you also don't seem to understand is that I'm all about NORMALCY--not losing the fabulously wonderful life we all have--as there is a distinct possibility of if the wrong side gets in power this time around.

When I "go off on a tangent" and rant about leftist scum like Russert, Obama, etc., it is with that in mind--the logical extension of all they stand for is the LOSS of all the freedom and enjoyment we have--ultimately including sports, political discussion, and yes, probably even sex



)

[bobblehead]

Tyrone, you are way off base with your description. Most conservatives are VERY liberal on social issues right up to the point where you want us to PAY for all the results of that "open mindedness" the left pushes.

I am all for gay rights, blacks rights, I'm pro choice (though I like the 11 week rule for certain biological reasons), and I'm pretty liberal on all the social issues...right up until you want me to prove my openness by paying for peoples bad choices.

Your signature shows me that you equate consevatives with religious whackos, and that is about as fair as me labelling all liberals with green freaks.

Let me clue you in to something that may piss off some religious people...we accept them into our ranks so that the left won't completely screw up this country with their socialist agenda. Many of us don't think homosexuality is a sin, but we do believe that the fundamentals of the judeo christian lifestyle is advantageous to the individual and society. We don't care if you choose to live differently, just don't ask us to pay for it.

[texaspackerbacker]

Interesting philosophical manifesto, Bobblehead. It was so syrupy and even-handed that you could be running for office.

You, with your libertarian leanings are probably just a bit closer to the liberal slant on social issues than most conservatives. Even I--being slightly less in that direction than you, am probably less "out there" on social issues than most conservatives.

Myself, I would stop short of saying I don't see homosexuality as a sin--given the fact that the Bible calls it an abomination. I think most conservatives wouldn't agree with you on that one. My own position, however, is that the whole issue is rather insignificant, and that homosexuals should be left alone to practice their "abomination"--just that it should NOT be portrayed as mainstream or OK or morally equivalent.

Similarly, with abortion, I'd stop short of being pro-choice. Either a fetus is a living person--who shouldn't be murdered, or it isn't. It's kind of an all or nothing situation. Then again, killing is a part of life, isn't it--war, capital punishment, cheatin' spouses that "need killin'"? My position here too, is that in the grand scheme of things, the whole abortion issue just isn't very important. And then, of course, you have the angle that if none of those tens of millions had been aborted, a large enough percentage would have had liberal gnes and would have reached voting age that we probably would have been saddled with a Gore or Kerry presidency--either of which would have damaged the country beyond repair. So maybe abortion is God's will, given the fact that He is pro-American.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Tyrone, you are way off base with your description. Most conservatives are VERY liberal on social issues right up to the point where you want us to PAY for all the results of that "open mindedness" the left pushes.

I am all for gay rights, blacks rights, I'm pro choice (though I like the 11 week rule for certain biological reasons), and I'm pretty liberal on all the social issues...right up until you want me to prove my openness by paying for peoples bad choices.

Your signature shows me that you equate consevatives with religious whackos, and that is about as fair as me labelling all liberals with green freaks.

Let me clue you in to something that may piss off some religious people...we accept them into our ranks so that the left won't completely screw up this country with their socialist agenda. Many of us don't think homosexuality is a sin, but we do believe that the fundamentals of the judeo christian lifestyle is advantageous to the individual and society. We don't care if you choose to live differently, just don't ask us to pay for it.

Let me clue you in. The republican party is far more unified under thought then dems. For you to argue this is insane. That is the point.

Who said anything about conservs and social issues. What a leap.

The point was simply that very little unites the dems...it is a myriad of disparate interests. Are you trying to tell me that if i'm a believer in Peta that i would support unions. Or if woman's reproductie rights are my big issue that i'll support eco issues? They have no linkage.

Sig: Again, your bias limits you. How you can equate my sig with conservs is..well bogling. Are you trying to say that liberals don't read the bible, koran or Torah. BTW, i'm sure those east coast liberal Jews sure would like you to explain that to them. Yikes.

The sig is from a song by Bright Eyes. Nothing more.

The problem with conservs..not all, but those like Tex..is that they believe lilberals have some sorta communist agenda. Far from it. And, for liberals...the ones you don't like..they believe conservs are all racists and have sheets waiting to be put on. Far from it. But, you show your colors by talking about socialism. Get serious.

P.S. We love it when you invoke the judeo christian thing. One, the judeo part is quite limited...as jews don't even come close to having the same views...jews are not conservs. They don't veiw sex the same, nor do they have the same view on homo marriage.