McCain/Obama

[LL2]

This one's better.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us...pagewanted=all

The liberal left just trying to dig up dirt whereever they can...if you look for it on anyone you will find it.

Did you know Biden used to plagerize speeches years ago? Did you know Hilary and her husband were involved in shady land deals when Bill was a governor?

[texaspackerbacker]

This one's better.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us...pagewanted=all

The liberal left just trying to dig up dirt whereever they can...if you look for it on anyone you will find it.

Did you know Biden used to plagerize speeches years ago? Did you know Hilary and her husband were involved in shady land deals when Bill was a governor?

Why is it you never have to look very hard when it's the Dems you're talking about?

And why is it the media glosses it over and defends them anyway when it's the Dems you're talking about?

Why is it the careers of Biden, Clinton, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and a whole host of other Dems continued unscathed, while the fag Congressman from Florida, George Allen, Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, the governor of Illinois who ran for senate against Obama, etc. etc. etc. had their careers ruined for the same or actually much less?

[Freak Out]

This one's better.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us...pagewanted=all

The liberal left just trying to dig up dirt whereever they can...if you look for it on anyone you will find it.

Did you know Biden used to plagerize speeches years ago? Did you know Hilary and her husband were involved in shady land deals when Bill was a governor?

Dirt? At least not in the classic sense. That's just how she does business. Favoritism ahead of professionalism? We should be used to that considering who we as a nation have put in power over the last few years.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

This one's better.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us...pagewanted=all

Ah, the Times...

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

[SkinBasket]

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

The graph clearly shows the NYT is biased.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

The graph clearly shows the NYT is biased.

Skin with another ad hominem attack.

[SkinBasket]

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

The graph clearly shows the NYT is biased.

Skin with another ad hominem attack.

Find some numbers that prove mine wrong then.

[packinpatland]

Forget the numbers, graphs.......show me where the NYT was dead wrong with their facts.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

The graph clearly shows the NYT is biased.

Skin with another ad hominem attack.

Find some numbers that prove mine wrong then.

Am i disputing your graph?

We await your research on voting by education/smarts, real critique of the numbers i posted by ANY source, and any critique of the NYT story that disputes the acccuracy of the work.

[Scott Campbell]

Yeah, yeah. Whatever you say Tyrone.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Yeah, yeah. Whatever you say Tyrone.

Getting testy scott..must be fearful of obama win.

[Freak Out]

Ah, Skin with another ad hominem attack. What a surprise.

The graph clearly shows the NYT is biased.

I thought this was funny.

[texaspackerbacker]

It's a shame how some of these decent issue and candidate oriented threads degenerate like this.

I think it's the fault of the lame leftists--who are so grossly WRONGHEADED and OUT OF TUNE with America and good normal Americans on the issues that all they can do is DIVERT and RUN AND HIDE.

You see the same thing on the national scene too. The America-hating ...... rectums ........ just don't dare confront McCain/Palin on the issues, so they try to blur things and divert toward character assassination and irrelevancy.

The Obama campaign and their leftist mainstream media allies are testicularly challenged, just like our lame forum leftists.

[packinpatland]

Forget the numbers, graphs.......show me where the NYT was dead wrong with their facts.

[SkinBasket]

Am i disputing your graph?

We await your research on voting by education/smarts, real critique of the numbers i posted by ANY source, and any critique of the NYT story that disputes the acccuracy of the work.

Tyrone, no one knows what the fuck you're disputing anymore because you dispute everything on the forum without ever saying anything.

I gave you your fucking critique on your numbers. Read it again if you've forgotten. You made excuses about google failing you instead of addressing the fact that your data doesn't mean shit to the argument at hand.

Forgive me if I don't consider the NYT a credible source of unbiased news. I hardly think I'm alone. And neither is Palin in doing what every politician does when they take office. They fill jobs with those who helped them get there and those who share their views. Of course it's only news to the Times when a republican in need of smearing is the subject.

I certainly didn't read anything that suggested Alaska fell into a state of unrecoverable turmoil as a result of her appointments. Or that there were even any complaints about the jobs those people she appointed were doing. Other than of course *GASP* she knew them growing up!!! In fact, the 80% approval rating would seem to indicate that those who were affected most by these decisions are happy with them, even if the New York Times isn't.

The rest of the article is the same recycled non-stories that every anti-Palin publication has been trying to push since she took the stage at the convention and scared the shit out of Obama's flock.