7 years since 9-11

[BallHawk]

Rigorous immigration policy based on proper usage of: there, their, and they're.

In that case, I don't foresee many people on this forum buying property in Dublin in the near future.

[Scott Campbell]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

Northern Hemisphere?

[BallHawk]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

Northern Hemisphere?

All except for Australia.

But, no, that ain't it.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Rigorous immigration policy based on proper usage of: there, their, and they're.

In that case, I don't foresee many people on this forum buying property in Dublin in the near future.

Fuck the Irish, luring Ty to the Emerald isle with craic!

[swede]

[texaspackerbacker]

(No)Ballhawk, I'm still waiting to here what nations you think are equal to or better than America/Americans--by any rational criteria including the lame things you cited.

Iceland
Norway
Australia
Canada
Ireland
Sweden
Switzerland
Japan
Netherlands
France
Finland

Countries only a socialist could love! Which one are you gonna move too--since you prefer them to the U.S.?

And what will become of them when your boy, Obama, gets in and takes away the American umbrella of protection for them? If you like Euro-style socialism, you'll probably LOVE jihadist-style Sharia Law.

Congrats on responding, though. That puts you a cut above most of the truly No-Ball leftists in the forum.

Congrats on waiting until he posted to lambast him! Especially since you would have done so regardless of what he would have listed...

I didn't think he'd list ANY--because in reality, there are NONE--nations superior to this country and the people in it by any comprehensive objective standard.

Is it lambasting to gently point out how wrongheaded somebody is? The ones I lambast are the genitalia-impaired leftists of the forum who never saw an issue they didn't run away from--and with good reason, because they are so wrong and out of tune with the views and values of normal America-loving Americans.

You can forward your prize to me, Ballhawk. The most obvious thing all those countries have in common is that they are dependent on America for protection against the world's evil forces--yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

[falco]

(No)Ballhawk, I'm still waiting to here what nations you think are equal to or better than America/Americans--by any rational criteria including the lame things you cited.

Iceland
Norway
Australia
Canada
Ireland
Sweden
Switzerland
Japan
Netherlands
France
Finland

Countries only a socialist could love! Which one are you gonna move too--since you prefer them to the U.S.?

And what will become of them when your boy, Obama, gets in and takes away the American umbrella of protection for them? If you like Euro-style socialism, you'll probably LOVE jihadist-style Sharia Law.

Congrats on responding, though. That puts you a cut above most of the truly No-Ball leftists in the forum.

Congrats on waiting until he posted to lambast him! Especially since you would have done so regardless of what he would have listed...

I didn't think he'd list ANY--because in reality, there are NONE--nations superior to this country and the people in it by any comprehensive objective standard.

Is it lambasting to gently point out how wrongheaded somebody is? The ones I lambast are the genitalia-impaired leftists of the forum who never saw an issue they didn't run away from--and with good reason, because they are so wrong and out of tune with the views and values of normal America-loving Americans.

You can forward your prize to me, Ballhawk. The most obvious thing all those countries have in common is that they are dependent on America for protection against the world's evil forces--yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

[Scott Campbell]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

Northern Hemisphere?

All except for Australia.

But, no, that ain't it.

When you'd sneak the Aussies in there?

[HowardRoark]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

The Governmnet has taken over healthcare in all these countries.

[Scott Campbell]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

The Governmnet has taken over healthcare in all these countries.

Then why not Great Britain?

[HowardRoark]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

The Governmnet has taken over healthcare in all these countries.

Then why not Great Britain?

Evidently Ballhawk doesn't prefer bangers and mash.

[BallHawk]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

The Governmnet has taken over healthcare in all these countries.

Then why not Great Britain?

Evidently Ballhawk doesn't prefer bangers and mash.

As much as I like my home country of the UK (and bangers and mash), the country is going to shit. Gordon Brown is incompetent, too much immigration, and the healthcare in that country is god awful. The problem there isn't NHS it's how it's executed.

And nobody's got it, yet. Keep on thinking.

[HowardRoark]

The problem there isn't NHS it's how it's executed.

That’s the same problem the perpetual motion machine has……..execution.

[retailguy]

All the countries I listed have something in common. First one to realize what it is gets a prize.

The Governmnet has taken over healthcare in all these countries.

Then why not Great Britain?

Evidently Ballhawk doesn't prefer bangers and mash.

As much as I like my home country of the UK (and bangers and mash), the country is going to shit. Gordon Brown is incompetent, too much immigration, and the healthcare in that country is god awful. The problem there isn't NHS it's how it's executed.

And nobody's got it, yet. Keep on thinking.

A good liberal like you would defer to the wisdom of the United Nations.

That would be the top 11 of the "human development index", I believe. You probably should inform the rest of the forum that our good buddies in the UN ranked us 12th.... Of course, we'd probably shoot up the list if we paid our dues, though, wouldn't we?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index

[BallHawk]

A good liberal like you would defer to the wisdom of the United Nations.

That would be the top 11 of the "human development index", I believe. You probably should inform the rest of the forum that our good buddies in the UN ranked us 12th.... Of course, we'd probably shoot up the list if we paid our dues, though, wouldn't we?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index

Our good buddies probably don't know what the HDI is.

Do you have any proof that the HDI is biased or slanted in any way?