Originally posted by Cy
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Numinous Negro
Collapse
X
-
Like most things..you can't even get the basics right. It is Senator Sanders.Originally posted by wist43Bernie Sanders??? Congressman Bernie Sanders??? The Socialist Congressman Bernie Sanders???Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe most liberal senator is the biggest canard.
Any ranking that has Obama #1 over Sanders is laughable.
Amazing how each time a dem runs for prez he is the most liberal.
Obama isn't liberal... he's a Marxist nut. I don't even have to make the case - he's made it all on his own.
And, to put Obama as more liberal than Sanders is hilarious.
No wonder the repubs are losing the senate and congress..you guys can't even figure out what is reality.
Comment
-
No way Ballhawk. I'm sure the reason that the NJ released only Obama and Clinton earlier than all the other Senators was pure happenstance.Originally posted by BallHawkOr the republican base anticipates who the most likely Democratic candidate will be and skews the stats to make the nominee the most liberal senator.Originally posted by CyBut there's a simple explanation for this. When a Dem knows he's going to run for president, he needs to get the kook, left-wing base on board in the primaries. So he has to tack left.
Because, of course, Obama is more liberal than a self-described Socialist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsLike most things..you can't even get the basics right. It is Senator Sanders.Originally posted by wist43Bernie Sanders??? Congressman Bernie Sanders??? The Socialist Congressman Bernie Sanders???Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe most liberal senator is the biggest canard.
Any ranking that has Obama #1 over Sanders is laughable.
Amazing how each time a dem runs for prez he is the most liberal.
Obama isn't liberal... he's a Marxist nut. I don't even have to make the case - he's made it all on his own.
And, to put Obama as more liberal than Sanders is hilarious.
No wonder the repubs are losing the senate and congress..you guys can't even figure out what is reality.You are wrong Ty.conĀ·gressĀ·man (kŏng'grĭs-mən) Pronunciation Key
n. A man who is a member of the U.S. Congress, especially of the House of Representatives.After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west⦠Vince Lombardi frowned.
Comment
-
I stand corrected... shows you how much I pay attention to "the game". Hadn't even noticed he had been elected Senator in 2006. Pitiful commentary on the citizens of Vermont. 16 years as a Congressman was bad enough.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsLike most things..you can't even get the basics right. It is Senator Sanders.Originally posted by wist43Bernie Sanders??? Congressman Bernie Sanders??? The Socialist Congressman Bernie Sanders???Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe most liberal senator is the biggest canard.
Any ranking that has Obama #1 over Sanders is laughable.
Amazing how each time a dem runs for prez he is the most liberal.
Obama isn't liberal... he's a Marxist nut. I don't even have to make the case - he's made it all on his own.
And, to put Obama as more liberal than Sanders is hilarious.
No wonder the repubs are losing the senate and congress..you guys can't even figure out what is reality.
That said, and as I've said, I'm not a Republican; and, in general, I don't get caught up in "the game". The "basics" as you say, are not keeping up with politics, the "basics" are contained in the Constitution... something no democrat has any reverence for whatsoever.
The Constitution is the most anti-Socialist document ever written. That is a "basic" fact that every democrat has to run from.wist
Comment
-
False....we all were 100% convinced that Hillary would be the nominee in 2007.Originally posted by BallHawkOr the republican base anticipates who the most likely Democratic candidate will be and skews the stats to make the nominee the most liberal senator.Originally posted by CyBut there's a simple explanation for this. When a Dem knows he's going to run for president, he needs to get the kook, left-wing base on board in the primaries. So he has to tack left.
Because, of course, Obama is more liberal than a self-described Socialist.
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
The NJ's rankings came out Janury 31st, 2008. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that by this time Obama's lead in the primaries and strong momentum didn't have "100%" of us convinced Hillary would be the nominee.Originally posted by bobbleheadFalse....we all were 100% convinced that Hillary would be the nominee in 2007.Originally posted by BallHawkOr the republican base anticipates who the most likely Democratic candidate will be and skews the stats to make the nominee the most liberal senator.Originally posted by CyBut there's a simple explanation for this. When a Dem knows he's going to run for president, he needs to get the kook, left-wing base on board in the primaries. So he has to tack left.
Because, of course, Obama is more liberal than a self-described Socialist.
"I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley
Comment
-
Really? Perhaps your ODS cleared out the results of the 06 elections.Originally posted by HowardRoarkOriginally posted by Tyrone BiggunsLike most things..you can't even get the basics right. It is Senator Sanders.Originally posted by wist43Bernie Sanders??? Congressman Bernie Sanders??? The Socialist Congressman Bernie Sanders???Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe most liberal senator is the biggest canard.
Any ranking that has Obama #1 over Sanders is laughable.
Amazing how each time a dem runs for prez he is the most liberal.
Obama isn't liberal... he's a Marxist nut. I don't even have to make the case - he's made it all on his own.
And, to put Obama as more liberal than Sanders is hilarious.
No wonder the repubs are losing the senate and congress..you guys can't even figure out what is reality.You are wrong Ty.conĀ·gressĀ·man (kŏng'grĭs-mən) Pronunciation Key
n. A man who is a member of the U.S. Congress, especially of the House of Representatives.
Comment
-
Re: The Numinous Negro
he is not a 4 year senator. He was a Senator for 1 year, since then he's been almost entirely a presidential candidate, with all of his positions molded for a campaign.Originally posted by CyWhy the absolutely irrational, uncritical support for a four year senator
oh well, maybe it just means America is a great country, the land of upward mobility.
Comment
-
Ok, got me..we rigged the game, obama is a moderate. The reason the most liberal guy gets the nomination is because the party is run by radicals....not because the evil conservatives rigged the ranking system. I didn't realize that the "rankings" came out in 2008, but it WAS based on the votes of 2007. If obama isn't the most liberal senator by some ranking you can come up with post it. I don't care if bernie sanders is more liberal or not, obama is a way leftwinger and trying to change the arguement to "The game was rigged" is just silly.Originally posted by BallHawkThe NJ's rankings came out Janury 31st, 2008. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that by this time Obama's lead in the primaries and strong momentum didn't have "100%" of us convinced Hillary would be the nominee.Originally posted by bobbleheadFalse....we all were 100% convinced that Hillary would be the nominee in 2007.Originally posted by BallHawkOr the republican base anticipates who the most likely Democratic candidate will be and skews the stats to make the nominee the most liberal senator.Originally posted by CyBut there's a simple explanation for this. When a Dem knows he's going to run for president, he needs to get the kook, left-wing base on board in the primaries. So he has to tack left.
Because, of course, Obama is more liberal than a self-described Socialist.
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Obama has gotten a big boost in three areas of media: news, opinion and entertainment. I think the news has been the fairest of the three, although Obama certainly has been propped-up against both Hillary Clinton and McCain with selective coverage. The breathless coverage of the Great Man blessing the adoring europeans, or the fawning over the Messiah's diversionary speech on race are two good examples.
The killer has been all the talk shows that obsessively skewered McCain as a befuddled old man and Hillary Clinton as the wicked witch of the west. Any "criticisms" of Obama from the entertainment shows have been cutesy and affectionate.
Comment


Comment