This guy looks like a moron now

[Fritz]

I'm glad they don't have any video of me predicting that Odell Thurman and Robert Ferguson were going to be stars in this league!

[Partial]

I guess I don't see how he's that far off point.

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

He also said the Pack was a contender in 2007, and wouldn't be in 2008 with Rodgers. They weren't in 2008 with Rodgers.

With that said, his wording is a poorly chosen. At no point does he say Rodgers is a bad player or anything like that. He simply implies the Packers 2008 season will be a disaster, and it was.

[Lurker64]

Considering that the speaker in the Youtube video was doing a Fantasy Football analysis, he absolutely does look like an idiot at this point. From a Fantasy Football perspective, Rodgers was stellar last year, since Fantasy throws out all the things about "wins and losses" and "clutch performances", and Rodgers was (statistically) one of the best QBs in the league last year.

[channtheman]

I guess I don't see how he's that far off point.

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

He also said the Pack was a contender in 2007, and wouldn't be in 2008 with Rodgers. They weren't in 2008 with Rodgers.

With that said, his wording is a poorly chosen. At no point does he say Rodgers is a bad player or anything like that. He simply implies the Packers 2008 season will be a disaster, and it was.

You need to look no further than the title of the video and his first line. "One of my bigger busts is Aaron Rodgers." He wasn't a bust. Also, no one would have been a contender with our defense last year.

[cpk1994]

I guess I don't see how he's that far off point.

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

He also said the Pack was a contender in 2007, and wouldn't be in 2008 with Rodgers. They weren't in 2008 with Rodgers.

With that said, his wording is a poorly chosen. At no point does he say Rodgers is a bad player or anything like that. He simply implies the Packers 2008 season will be a disaster, and it was.

He said "Rodgers would be a bust in 2008". Did you miss that part? Also he implied Rodgers would be the reason they wouldn't be a contender. Rodgers wasn't the problem. The length you continue to go to bash Rodgers is getting down right pathetic.

[vince]

At no point does he say Rodgers is a bad player or anything like that.

Partial, the lengths to which your brain goes to block out, misfile, misunderstand and make nonsense out of that which is not in alignment with your preconceived opinions is truly amazing. What a powerful ego you have.

[Patler]

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

By that analysis, Brett Favre was fragile too. In how many years was he injured, but played through it?? Most of them, by my recollection. Being injured at some point in the season does not mean you are fragile.

[Scott Campbell]

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

By that analysis, Brett Favre was fragile too. In how many years was he injured, but played through it?? Most of them, by my recollection. Being injured at some point in the season does not mean you are fragile.

These days I think he's more emotionally fragile. The dude cries more than Dick Vermeil watching Old Yeller.

[Partial]

I guess I don't see how he's that far off point.

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

He also said the Pack was a contender in 2007, and wouldn't be in 2008 with Rodgers. They weren't in 2008 with Rodgers.

With that said, his wording is a poorly chosen. At no point does he say Rodgers is a bad player or anything like that. He simply implies the Packers 2008 season will be a disaster, and it was.

He said "Rodgers would be a bust in 2008". Did you miss that part? Also he implied Rodgers would be the reason they wouldn't be a contender. Rodgers wasn't the problem. The length you continue to go to bash Rodgers is getting down right pathetic.

Well.. how was he not? Quarterbacks are ultimately judged on wins and losses, not pretty stats in the middle of the field.

[Partial]

He said he's fragile.. He did get hurt last year, in addition to every other year he's been in the league. Sure, he played through it, but will he be able to stay healthy next year? Maybe, maybe not.

By that analysis, Brett Favre was fragile too. In how many years was he injured, but played through it?? Most of them, by my recollection. Being injured at some point in the season does not mean you are fragile.

Agreed, but this was prior to last season, when he showed a remarkable ability to hurt himself :P . So far, he's made it through one season. Hopefully he can do it again.

[MJZiggy]

Actually, you've missed the dude's whole point. He was trying to say that the Packers would absolutely suck because they made a horrible mistake in not handing Brett the starting gig back. That the team would suck because it was not led by Brett Favre, but as been posted a million times already, Favre was not statistically better. The Jets imploded at the end of the season and their win/loss record had far more to do with their QB than our record had to do with ours. Therefore, yes, the guy is a moron. If you bring up injury and their record at the beginning of the season, I will remind you that a true leader would have sat himself down when it became apparent that his injury was affecting the bottom line of the team. I wonder if that's why a certain coach lost his job...???

[Scott Campbell]

If you bring up injury and their record at the beginning of the season, I will remind you that a true leader would have sat himself down when it became apparent that his injury was affecting the bottom line of the team. I wonder if that's why a certain coach lost his job...???

The streak was more important than Mangini.

[vince]

Quarterbacks are ultimately judged on wins and losses, not pretty stats in the middle of the field.

Aaron Rodgers is only effective in the middle of the field? Are you suggesting he can't put the ball in the end zone? Where in the hell do you get this stuff and how can you possibly believe it to be true? I don't think I've ever seen a more appropriate avatar than yours with that guy who babbles on and on and on like a broken record. Is your entire persona some kind of ruse I'm not hip to? The Rogue Rat? You know what that means I assume...

Only three quarterbacks in the league put the ball in the end zone through the air more than Rodgers did lin his first year starting last year. Only effective in the middle of the field? Rigth. Can't put the ball in the endzone? Right. He also ran for 4 TDs himself.

Inside the red zone, he threw for 19 TDs and 0 INTs. Yes a big fat goose egg. Oh, and that comprehensive quarterback efficiency statistic you conveniently use when it suits your opinion, and dismiss when it doesn't...Rodgers' QB rating was 106.8 inside the opponent's 20 yard line.

Only effective in the middle of the field I tell ya. The power of the ego at work...

Yup, the Packers were 6-10 last year. Therefore, Aaron Rodgers is only effective in the middle of the field and can't get the ball in the end zone.

You're still in school aren't you P? You need to take a course in logic my friend.

[Scott Campbell]

I don't think I've ever seen a more appropriate avatar than yours with that guy who babbles on and on and on like a broken record. Is your entire persona some kind of ruse I'm not hip to? The Rogue Rat? You know what that means I assume...

I assume he's still just upset about the whole Brett fiasco.

[RashanGary]

Partial has been talking about how irreplaceable Favre was and how there was no way a 25 year old (never started a game) QB could come in and lead a comparable offense with the same players. He argued over and over there was no way the Packers would choose Rodgers over Favre. When it happened he swore they were ruining their franchise (pretty much the same stuff this guy said in the vid)

Rodgers (in his first games ever starting in the NFL) came out and lead a comparable offense.

Now, he hangs on the last little shred of hate he can. He says Rodgers only throws to the outside, said he can't throw over the middle of the field. He says it, but he's never proven it. It's just something he says that allows him to not accept reality.

The reality is that first year Rodgers is as good as recent Favre (better now). He can't admit that to himself. I wouldn't take offense to it. Partial isn't enough of a man to admit (to himself) when he's wrong. Every time you see him beating his dead horse, feel bad for him because it's his weakness. Think of it as him squirming because everyone except him knows he's full of shit.