This guy looks like a moron now

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I thought you were going to respect the admin's desires.

starting now, I promise!

I'm sorry, but you must be punished. You will appreciate what you had when you are banned for a couple of months.

Look at the good it did to Scott Campbell. Rehabilitated.

[falco]

I thought you were going to respect the admin's desires.

starting now, I promise!

I'm sorry, but you must be punished. You will appreciate what you had when you are banned for a couple of months.

Look at the good it did to Scott Campbell. Rehabilitated.

yeah, but I don't have three (or more) wives to keep me company during my hiatus!

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I thought you were going to respect the admin's desires.

starting now, I promise!

I'm sorry, but you must be punished. You will appreciate what you had when you are banned for a couple of months.

Look at the good it did to Scott Campbell. Rehabilitated.

yeah, but I don't have three (or more) wives to keep me company during my hiatus!

Of course you don't. Who could stand to live with your mean spirited and vicious comments.

Perhaps you shoulda thought about that before you attacked me. I won't enjoy your banning, it hurts me as much as it hurts you, but it is for your own good. You will be better for it.

Ty will allow you to watch tv, won't take away phone privileges, and you can still go to the big dance next friday.

[Zool]

I would much rather have the Packers fail and have all the douches leave the forum. Absolutely.

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a Partial when the packer season is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...

Now you're fucked. P put Iocane powder in both goblets.

[Partial]

TY, I ACTUALLY REALLY LIKE THIS POST

1. Partial tells us not to use numbers, wins and losses are how you judge a QB, but then we should be prepared for massive crow if he doesn't put up an 85. But, i thought wins and losses defined a QB.

BOTH MATTER TO A DEGREE. WHO CARES IF YOU HAVE PRETTY STATS AND LOSE? WHO CARES IF YOU HAVE UGLY STATS AND WIN? WINNING HAS TO HAPPEN FIRST AND FOREMOST.

2. Makes a comparison to VY and closing out games. VY doesn't have a large enough sample size to draw conclusions about his ability to close out games.

IF VY'S SAMPLE SIZE ISN'T BIG ENOUGH (ROTY AFTER HIS FIRST YEAR STARTING), THEN ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT THE JURY IS STILL OUT ON RODGERS. I AGREE COMPLETELY THAT BOTH NEED MORE GAMES UNDER THEIR BELTS BEFORE WE CAN CONCLUDE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.


3. Compares VY to Arod...how?


I DIDN'T MAKE THAT ARGUMENT. SOMEONE ELSE INITIALLY MADE THAT COMPARISON, NOT ME. TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BALL PLAYERS. VY ISN'T SO MUCH A TRADITIONAL QB IN MY OPINION, AS I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG.

NFL IS CATCHING ON TO PARTIAL BALL. PAT WHITE AND THE WILD CAT ARE GONNA BE BIG. PUT YOUNG IN A ROLL WHERE HE ISN'T A REQUIRED TO BE A TRADITIONAL POCKET PASSER AND CAN USE HIS WHEELS AND HE'LL BE FINE.

4. Comes back with the injury prone argument. Did he miss any games last year? No. Brett was always injured, but Brett is a warrior.

NOPE, HE WAS HEALTHY IN HIS FIRST YEAR STARTING. HOWEVER, WE MISSED KEY GAMES IN 2007 WITH AN INJURY, HAD A BROKEN FOOT IN 2006, AND I BELIEVE HE GOT HURT BADLY IN 2005 AS WELL. HE'S NOT OUT OF THE WATER YET.

5. Be prepared to eat massive crow. Admin...if you don't see how he is asking for it then..well, you are just being kind. If we are suppose to be ready for crow..then he and you should be prepared for us to serve him crow...right now, since he is foolish.

NOT REALLY, NOTHING HAS BEEN SHOWN EITHER WAY. I DON'T THINK RODGERS HAD AS GOOD OF A SEASON AS MANY HERE DO. HE WAS 6-10. WINS AND LOSSES COME BEFORE STATS. SLIGHTLY BETTER OFFENSIVE PERFORMANCES IN A FEW OF THOSE CLOSE LOSSES AND NOT RELYING SO MUCH ON THE D AND THIS TEAM IS A PLAYOFF TEAM AND MY OPINION OF RODGERS IS MUCH DIFFERENT. HE CAN'T LAY AN EGG FOR 3 QUARTERS AGAINST GOOD TEAMS.

[cpk1994]

TY, I ACTUALLY REALLY LIKE THIS POST

1. Partial tells us not to use numbers, wins and losses are how you judge a QB, but then we should be prepared for massive crow if he doesn't put up an 85. But, i thought wins and losses defined a QB.

BOTH MATTER TO A DEGREE. WHO CARES IF YOU HAVE PRETTY STATS AND LOSE? WHO CARES IF YOU HAVE UGLY STATS AND WIN? WINNING HAS TO HAPPEN FIRST AND FOREMOST.

2. Makes a comparison to VY and closing out games. VY doesn't have a large enough sample size to draw conclusions about his ability to close out games.

IF VY'S SAMPLE SIZE ISN'T BIG ENOUGH (ROTY AFTER HIS FIRST YEAR STARTING), THEN ITS PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT THE JURY IS STILL OUT ON RODGERS. I AGREE COMPLETELY THAT BOTH NEED MORE GAMES UNDER THEIR BELTS BEFORE WE CAN CONCLUDE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.


3. Compares VY to Arod...how?


I DIDN'T MAKE THAT ARGUMENT. SOMEONE ELSE INITIALLY MADE THAT COMPARISON, NOT ME. TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BALL PLAYERS. VY ISN'T SO MUCH A TRADITIONAL QB IN MY OPINION, AS I HAVE SAID ALL ALONG.

NFL IS CATCHING ON TO PARTIAL BALL. PAT WHITE AND THE WILD CAT ARE GONNA BE BIG. PUT YOUNG IN A ROLL WHERE HE ISN'T A REQUIRED TO BE A TRADITIONAL POCKET PASSER AND CAN USE HIS WHEELS AND HE'LL BE FINE.

4. Comes back with the injury prone argument. Did he miss any games last year? No. Brett was always injured, but Brett is a warrior.

NOPE, HE WAS HEALTHY IN HIS FIRST YEAR STARTING. HOWEVER, WE MISSED KEY GAMES IN 2007 WITH AN INJURY, HAD A BROKEN FOOT IN 2006, AND I BELIEVE HE GOT HURT BADLY IN 2005 AS WELL. HE'S NOT OUT OF THE WATER YET.

5. Be prepared to eat massive crow. Admin...if you don't see how he is asking for it then..well, you are just being kind. If we are suppose to be ready for crow..then he and you should be prepared for us to serve him crow...right now, since he is foolish.

NOT REALLY, NOTHING HAS BEEN SHOWN EITHER WAY. I DON'T THINK RODGERS HAD AS GOOD OF A SEASON AS MANY HERE DO. HE WAS 6-10. WINS AND LOSSES COME BEFORE STATS. SLIGHTLY BETTER OFFENSIVE PERFORMANCES IN A FEW OF THOSE CLOSE LOSSES AND NOT RELYING SO MUCH ON THE D AND THIS TEAM IS A PLAYOFF TEAM AND MY OPINION OF RODGERS IS MUCH DIFFERENT. HE CAN'T LAY AN EGG FOR 3 QUARTERS AGAINST GOOD TEAMS.

FOR THE LAST TIME, THE DEFENSE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6-10 NOT RODGRS. YOUR BULLSHIT IS GETTING OLD. QUIT GIVNG THE DEFENSE A FEE PASS. NO ONE IS BUIYING THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE SELLING!

[Zool]

FOR THE LAST TIME, THE ENTIRE TEAM WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6-10 NOT JUST RODGRS. YOUR BULLSHIT IS GETTING OLD. QUIT GIVNG THE DEFENSE A FEE PASS. NO ONE IS BUIYING THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE SELLING!

fixored

[cpk1994]

FOR THE LAST TIME, THE ENTIRE TEAM WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6-10 NOT JUST RODGRS. YOUR BULLSHIT IS GETTING OLD. QUIT GIVNG THE DEFENSE A FEE PASS. NO ONE IS BUIYING THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE SELLING!

fixored

Couldn't let me have my rant, could you?

[Bretsky]

You better all hope like hell he doesn't put up an 85 QB rating next year..................

And this would make you happy because...................???

This is the part that pisses me off. It seems like P would be happy if the Packers fail this year so he can be right.

don't really buy it.

[Zool]

FOR THE LAST TIME, THE ENTIRE TEAM WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6-10 NOT JUST RODGRS. YOUR BULLSHIT IS GETTING OLD. QUIT GIVNG THE DEFENSE A FEE PASS. NO ONE IS BUIYING THE BULLSHIT YOU ARE SELLING!

fixored

Couldn't let me have my rant, could you?

I was going to. I almost didn't post it, but although P is doing almost all of this because he likes being the anti-hero he occasionally lets out a nugget of truth. Rodgers didnt play like a vet QB. Granted he isn't one yet so that has a whole lot to do with it. Maybe if the O sustains 1-2 more drives for 3 more downs in the first half the D doesn't have to hold a 6 point lead in the 4th. Maybe a vet QB makes the correct check down on a 3rd and 3 more often than a newb.

Maybe if the D didn't play like a sieve in the 4th quarter maybe Rodgers doesn't have to have all this shit lumped on his shoulders. I mean the kid had to deal with Favre questions about 3-4 hours a day for 8 months. All the while being a first time starter in the NFL. And this is the crux of my problem with all the Rodgers bashing. Favre was a fucking moron in his first 2 seasons. People were calling for him to be replaced by Detmer. He turned out to be pretty good for a couple seasons after that.

Maybe instead of playing Retard Hatfields against Brain Damaged McCoys we could just let this discussion rest. It's not like either side is going to convince the other of anything.

[MJZiggy]

You better all hope like hell he doesn't put up an 85 QB rating next year..................

And this would make you happy because...................???

This is the part that pisses me off. It seems like P would be happy if the Packers fail this year so he can be right.

Yo, he does not note that he'd be happy about this

Yet a couple posts later he states clearly that he hopes it'll happen...Packers first, Partial being right way down at the bottom of the list. Thankfully, barring catastrophic injury to several key players, I don't see him getting his wish.

[Zool]

Yo, he does not note that he'd be happy about this

Yet a couple posts later he states clearly that he hopes it'll happen.

As he has a couple times previously. That is why I have a hard time letting him slide on some of this crap.

[Bretsky]

Admin seems to be doing a fair job here. It looks like he just wanted to end this messy little Partial, RG -v- Forum fight.

agree

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would much rather have the Packers fail and have all the douches leave the forum. Absolutely.

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never go in against a Partial when the packer season is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...

Now you're fucked. P put Iocane powder in both goblets.

I spent the last few years building up an immunity to iocane powder.

[Bretsky]

You better all hope like hell he doesn't put up an 85 QB rating next year..................

And this would make you happy because...................???

This is the part that pisses me off. It seems like P would be happy if the Packers fail this year so he can be right.

Yo, he does not note that he'd be happy about this

Yet a couple posts later he states clearly that he hopes it'll happen...Packers first, Partial being right way down at the bottom of the list. Thankfully, barring catastrophic injury to several key players, I don't see him getting his wish.

still don't buy it...although...many have been disrespectful to the poster rather than the post. I think he's jerking you around...but believe what you want