Jacko's Death, Reason Stranger Gives for Taking Pictures

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I would have beat the fuck out of him and if he asked what you were doing, just say, "Mike Tyson"

Sure you would.

I wouldn't? Try taking pics of my family, weirdo...and once again...quit replying to my fuckin posts. It's almost like you have a crush on me.

Really? You would assault someone for taking a picture of your family. That makes total sense.

You're an idiot. You really are...something is wrong with you.

I'm an idiot? This coming from someone who would "beat the fuck" out of someone attempting to take a picture? That pretty much defines idiot.

So you would let strangers take pics of your children for no reason? I'm pretty sure Nutz had a problem with it..as would I. Ty...I guess you're the type that's scared shitless and would tell your wife..."Honey, don't say nothing." Pussy.

I see..there is a choice..letting them take pics or beating them up? What a false dichotomy you present.

I might ask why they were doing so, I might ask them to stop, i might alert security, etc.

I might not beat up someone who might be innocent, just because i felt the need to prove i'm a man. People take photos for all sorts of reasons....just because you think they are a pedo doesn't make it so.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

[Scott Campbell]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

[Brando19]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

[Scott Campbell]

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You seem such a sensitive soul all of a sudden.

I think you should tell on Ayn. He's naughty.

[mraynrand]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Was he creepy or not?

Why? Didn't you already tell me that i argued he wasn't. When are you going to admit you are wrong.

You are asking me to deduce something from a posting. Ridiculous.

[Brando19]

I'd be willing to bet Bigguns was the guy trying to take the picture.

Are you suggesting i'm a pedo? Do you think that is in the spirit of what the admin has stated?

I will make sure to alert him to this type of thing.

Sounds like you're offended. Kind of puts you in a bind - you argued that it WASN'T creepy, yet now you act as though any suggestion that you might have tried to take the picture means you're a pedophilia (you brought up the term pedophile, I didn't). If you really didn't think it was creepy you wouldn't have responded. Your intellectual dishonesty and confused thinking has been noted. Plus, maybe you are a little creepy too.

No. Not offended. But, clearly not in the spirit of the admin.

I never argued that it wasn't creepy. Find that. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

You can pretend all you want, but the inference was that i was a pedo.

No, the inference was that you were dishonest. If you didn't think the photo taker was creepy, there would be no reason to feel compelled to respond to someone who suggested you were the photog. So, was the photog creepy or not?

Dishonest? When? By posting "sure you would."

At no point prior to your comment had i said anything other than it was idiotic to assault someone for TRYING TO TAKE A PIC.

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You can't even admit you were insulting. Can't man up. But, what else is new from another christian hypocrite.

Christian hypocrite? Listen, pal...you can talk all you want but leave religion out of it. Why even bring it up? You are a troubled human being.

I can talk all i want..that's funny..since you clearly have stated otherwise.

I guess free speech isn't allowed in your america.

You are another Xian hypocrite...getting all sanctimonious, while posting about celeb porn and your love of britney. Sure how you never choked it to any pics of her when she was under 18...that would make you a creepy pedo.

You seriously have a crush on me. You're a weird man. I never called you a pedo...but you'd probably do some creepy shit if given the chance. You remind me of the weird guy in Hannibal that cut his own face off.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Your post was clearly, in light of the the others suggesting the photo was a pedo, an insult.

You seem such a sensitive soul all of a sudden.

I think you should tell on Ayn. He's naughty.

I already said it didnt' offend me...i just think that in a post about a guy who might have been a pedo..or might not have...in thread where most are saying they would hurt him...that it is awfully hypocritical to imply Ty is one.

Rand: He is suffering enough with Obama as president.