Favre: What's With the Bashing? Some Sound Like Sad Exes....

[mraynrand]

Snake - there is already a thread for Favre discussion. If that was not your point for this thread it should not have been posted in the packers area. Consider this a warning.

So is the policy that any new Favre thread gets a warning? What is the policy? lame

I think the policy was to have 1 Favre thread in the Packer Forum so you don't end up with 15 Favre threads like we had the day the Packers traded him.

And? So what? It was pretty wild, but people settled on threads they wanted to comment on or not. But if you wanted to be treated like a child, feel free.

Don't rewrite history. Mad got sick of all the crap and we all settled on the one thread so that the forum wouldn't be completely deserted by anyone who wanted to do anything besides fight about Favre. It was done for a reason and Joe just continued what Mad did (because it's a good idea and makes sense, but damn common sense, right?).

Sure, if you have no self-control or discipline, have weak skin, etc. Sure, then you need a nanny to decide how much and how many Favre threads and comments you decide to pay attention to - people wanted to argue about it - they still do. Those who don't, avoid Favre threads and Favre discussion and participate in other threads - unless they have no discipline or self-control.

Seriously, what the fuck is your problem. The issue was solved long ago. One Favre thread.

If you don't like it, don't post here.

Most good forums have some sort of modding going on. Eliminating duplicate threads, moving threads, merging simultaneous conversations, etc.

Stop being an ass. Ty has has had his issues with joe the admin, but the consensus of the forum on this issue has long been achieved. One Favre thread.

P.S. Joe please don't view this as support for your rule. Ty still has issues with you.

See, I can just ignore this. Just like I can ignore Favre threads or Favre discussion in other non-Favre-titled threads. Or I can choose to respond, without name-calling. Pretty simple, for those who have self-control.

And exactly who around here are you thinking has self control. The reason one Favre thread was formed is precisely because folks around here lack your self-professed self control. (like you've never in the history of this forum gotten carried away and called someone a name? Please.) Favre gets people's dander up. The reason other forums don't have this going on is because they don't allow the discussion at all.

You made my point for me. I already acknowledged that the Admin has to stifle this stuff because people don't have control. I think it's lame, but it's always been true.

As far as your comment: "(like you've never in the history of this forum gotten carried away and called someone a name? Please.)" 1) read my post above. 2) Never say never

[Patler]

I have always favored a separate Favre forum rather than a single thread. Confining different topics to a single thread is cumbersome at best. With a Favre forum, any number of Favre threads for different Favre issues could be started. Those wanting to avoid Favre matters could do so easily, and those wanting to discuss different aspects of the Favre matter could sort it out easily.

The problem initially was everyone thought their Favre thought merited a new thread, and Packer topics quickly got bumped from the first page because everyone started new Favre threads for each different piece of information, or each new slant on old information. There was a time that it wasn't worth the effort to start a Packer thread.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Snake - there is already a thread for Favre discussion. If that was not your point for this thread it should not have been posted in the packers area. Consider this a warning.

So is the policy that any new Favre thread gets a warning? What is the policy? lame

I think the policy was to have 1 Favre thread in the Packer Forum so you don't end up with 15 Favre threads like we had the day the Packers traded him.

And? So what? It was pretty wild, but people settled on threads they wanted to comment on or not. But if you wanted to be treated like a child, feel free.

Don't rewrite history. Mad got sick of all the crap and we all settled on the one thread so that the forum wouldn't be completely deserted by anyone who wanted to do anything besides fight about Favre. It was done for a reason and Joe just continued what Mad did (because it's a good idea and makes sense, but damn common sense, right?).

Sure, if you have no self-control or discipline, have weak skin, etc. Sure, then you need a nanny to decide how much and how many Favre threads and comments you decide to pay attention to - people wanted to argue about it - they still do. Those who don't, avoid Favre threads and Favre discussion and participate in other threads - unless they have no discipline or self-control.

Seriously, what the fuck is your problem. The issue was solved long ago. One Favre thread.

If you don't like it, don't post here.

Most good forums have some sort of modding going on. Eliminating duplicate threads, moving threads, merging simultaneous conversations, etc.

Stop being an ass. Ty has has had his issues with joe the admin, but the consensus of the forum on this issue has long been achieved. One Favre thread.

P.S. Joe please don't view this as support for your rule. Ty still has issues with you.

See, I can just ignore this. Just like I can ignore Favre threads or Favre discussion in other non-Favre-titled threads. Or I can choose to respond, without name-calling. Pretty simple, for those who have self-control.

Sure. Congrats.

Too bad you have no self control regarding the admin.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

1. If the admin thought it was most certainly another Favre thread he'd have deleted it altogether, not moved it to the Romper Room. He moved it to the Romper Room because the discussion isn't football related, thus has no business in the Packer room. I agreed with that assesment. Glad you do to. No arguments there. But as far as I'm concerned, new Favre threads don't belong in the Romper Room either. They don't belong at all. If this really was another thread dedicated to Brett it wouldn't exist anymore. Or at least it shouldn't.

2. Again with the title. Get past the title to the meat of the discussion.

3. You are tired of Favre threads. But it wasn't a Favre discussion, just a Favre title. If you can't tolerate Favre titles, what are YOU doing at a public forum?

4. By the time Ty posted in this thread the topic had already been diverted from the bashing of Favre to bashing of other posters. And even if it hadn't yet, you still have the option of just ignoring what we're talking about rather than butting in. Our Admin will do what he does regardless how you feel about it, so you don't have to add your 2 cents. And as I've been saying all night, it wasn't a private conversation between Snake and I. I don't know where you get the private discussion part of it from. I have said repeatedly that it was an open discussion to anybody willing to comment on the topic we were discussing.

5. Correct, threads evolve all the time. Nobody is disputing that, obviously, since a thread whose title starts with the word FAVRE evolves into a different topic. This one had evolved before the 3rd post when you jumped in. In fact, this whole thread was an evolution of something Snake posted in the Favre thread just before this one was started. But as you've established in #6, the title of a thread is all that matters.

6. If your lazy ass can't be bothered to read a discussion before commenting on it, that's your problem. Don't begin to call out others because you are too lazy to read what they've said. I understand there are many, MANY people like you who likewise wouldn't be bothered to read a discussion before commenting on it. But only a few commented in THIS thread, which is the only one I'm arguing with you. And there is only ONE who is continuing to argue this with me. So don't be surprised if my comments are directed at you.

I agree with your simple fact. I've stated this time after time in this thread that it should have been started in the Romper Room rather than the Packer room. Did you read that in any of my previous posts, or can't you be bothered to read those either now that we're actually having this discussion. I'm with you on this one. But the Admin wasn't on during the middle of the night when Snake created it, while I was on during the middle of the night to comment on it. As soon as Admin saw the thread it was moved, and you haven't heard one complaint from me. I'm glad we can agree on at least ONE simple fact.

I had also commented on the original post, and how it took me a whole 30 minutes to divert the discussion away from that. I wouldn't expect you to get this if you weren't privy to his other posts that night, but this post was immediately following a post made by Snake in the Favre thread telling everybody to quit bashing 007. I knew where his mindset was at the time and diverted the conversation to that topic. And, again, if you had bothered to read the entire discussion rather than just the title and original post, you'd have gotten to this:

That's fine, but seeing certain posters get shit for supporting Brett makes me angry. State your points, but don't make them personal. Seen too much of that lately. Not everyone has to like everyone or the players. Agreed. Keep it off limits to not rip on certain peeps that like certain players and it's a-ok That's what I was sick of seeing.

That's what he was really arguing. Believe me, I understand if you didn't know, but I did and that's the conversation we ended up having. So I really didn't see the problem with having that discussion. But it annoys Ty, so I guess we shouldn't have it anymore. Sorry Ty. I'll refrain from discussing topics that aren't to your liking in the future.

1. Wrong. The admin has rarely deleted threads. He usually just moves them.
2. Title and first post by Snake. Pretty much about Favre. Patler sees it, Ty sees it, others see it.

Maybe you dont' get it. People read the first post and then get an impression. They aren't reading your particular response. Some will, some won't. Most will respond to the author's first post. It really shouldn't be that hard for you.

3. It was a favre post and discussion.

4. Diverted. AFter 3 posts? LOL Dude, keep spinning.

Private? Because you say OUR CONVERSATION. Hmm. That implies something.

5. 3 posts is an evolution? Nope. Only for you. Sorry. Your posts don't make it so.

6. Yeah, it is lazy. Ty is right, based on the responses to the first post.

Read Snake's first post again. Tell us all how it wasn't a Favre thread. Ty posted his own words..which you conveniently ignore.

Ty is thru with this.

[SnakeLH2006]

Ty is thru with this.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ah, back to being the usual snake. LOL

Pic: That is the best you can do. Wow. You are really slipping. Please get it together.

[GBRulz]

Same shit, different day around here..... the same people arguing about Favre and the same people stirring up shit.

[Scott Campbell]

Same shit, different day around here..... the same people arguing about Favre and the same people stirring up shit.

Hey - I haven't weighed in yet.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ty is thru with this.

Nice self portrait. Bawling like a little bitch after Favre shit the bed once again.

[Scott Campbell]

Ty is thru with this.

[GrnBay007]

Ty is thru with this.

Nice self portrait. Bawling like a little bitch after Favre shit the bed once again.

F you Ty. Little bitch? That's you know it all.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ty is thru with this.

Nice self portrait. Bawling like a little bitch after Favre shit the bed once again.

F you Ty. Little bitch? That's you know it all.

How ladylike.

Why would Ty be crying? Unless it is tears of joy.

Only people crying are you and the Favre dick suckers.

[Gunakor]

Ty is thru with this.

Nice self portrait. Bawling like a little bitch after Favre shit the bed once again.

F you Ty. Little bitch? That's you know it all.

How ladylike.

Why would Ty be crying? Unless it is tears of joy.

Only people crying are you and the Favre dick suckers.

See, this was the whole point of the thread. This is why people don't like you Ty, and it has nothing to do with what you say about football - which isn't a whole lot. Every day you come here and do your best to start fights. Every single day.

I liked you in the Brewers threads last summer, where you made intelligent contributions relevant to baseball and the Brewers specifically. But lately it seems your whole point in coming here is to annoy others rather than have positive discussion. When we call you out on it, we're the bad guys. What gives Ty?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ty is thru with this.

Nice self portrait. Bawling like a little bitch after Favre shit the bed once again.

F you Ty. Little bitch? That's you know it all.

How ladylike.

Why would Ty be crying? Unless it is tears of joy.

Only people crying are you and the Favre dick suckers.

See, this was the whole point of the thread. This is why people don't like you Ty, and it has nothing to do with what you say about football - which isn't a whole lot. Every day you come here and do your best to start fights. Every single day.

I liked you in the Brewers threads last summer, where you made intelligent contributions relevant to baseball and the Brewers specifically. But lately it seems your whole point in coming here is to annoy others rather than have positive discussion. When we call you out on it, we're the bad guys. What gives Ty?

Dude, read again. I said i was thru.

So, what does Snake do..post a pic. Ty responded to the pic. How did ty start the fight? Ty was talking with you..and said he was thru..not talking with snake.

And, Ty's response was to snake...there was no reason for 007 to make any comment.

How aren't snake and 007 the bad guys? They are attacking me personally. Ty didn't say one thing to Snake.

You need to reevaluate your perspective...or not.

Lastly, ty doesn't do anything every single day. That is ludicrous.

P.S. there are plenty that like me. Some that don't. Could care less.

[GrnBay007]

Dude, read again. I said i was thru.

So, what does Snake do..post a pic. Ty responded to the pic. How did ty start the fight? Ty was talking with you..and said he was thru..not talking with snake.

And, Ty's response was to snake...there was no reason for 007 to make any comment.

How aren't snake and 007 the bad guys? They are attacking me personally. Ty didn't say one thing to Snake.

You need to reevaluate your perspective...or not.

Lastly, ty doesn't do anything every single day. That is ludicrous.

P.S. there are plenty that like me. Some that don't. Could care less.

Every single time you get called on something you point the finger the other way. You are like a child on the playground that gets called out for something and blames the other guy. "He did it, so why can't I....and it was worse than what I did". Not just here, you do it all over the forum.....all the time. You are a KNOW IT ALL and everyone at PR know it....some tolerate you and think you are somewhat funny ( I don't know why). I don't care if I'm the "bad guy".....I said F you because you take cheap shots and I'm sick of it.