Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top 7 QB's of all time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by The Shadow
    By the way : why is the notion that Bart Starr could just possible be superior to Brett Favre be so terribly threatening to you?
    It isn't threatening. It just defies logic.

    While Starr is superior to Favre in some respects, he's clearly not a better overall QB than Favre. It isn't even close, really.
    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
      They went 28-48-2 in the three years before and after Lombardi, and Starr was the QB for a majority of that time.
      Yep.

      That's my point. If Starr was as great as Favre, his teams would not have possessed a .360 winning percentage over the years Starr did not have Lombardi on the sidelines. Yeah, I admit Starr was very young and very old without Lombardi...but in his first 3 years in the league, Starr SUCKED.

      That is a point guys like Shadow simply cannot bring themselves to admit. Shadow will point to Favre in 1993 and suggest it compares to Starr's early struggles...when there is no logical way to possibly compare those periods.

      Favre, despite constant changes in personnel, coaches and executives and his own personal struggles both on and off the field, had only ONE LOSING SEASON in Green Bay...and that season was so marred by injuries that Favre had the chance to work with such NFL stalwarts as Taco Wallace and Samkon Gado.

      Sorry, Starr lovers. No other GBP QB holds a candle to Favre as the total package.
      My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by The Shadow
        By the way : why is the notion that Bart Starr could just possible be superior to Brett Favre be so terribly threatening to you?
        This is a cheap cop out reply. Its just as easy to retort with "why is the notion that Favre could be superior so threatening to you?"

        Offensive gameplans from the 60's were quite a bit more simplistic than todays and specifically the WCO. Favre had to know more plays, more formations and more audibles. He has done more with less than Starr. No one is saying that Starr wasnt great, but Favre was better.

        Do you think Griese was better than Marino? He played in 3 straight and won 2 superbowls. Marino played in 1 and won 0.
        Originally posted by 3irty1
        This is museum quality stupidity.

        Comment


        • #94
          I hated Fran Tarkenton. Hated that guy. I just wanted to see him once, just once, get nailed.
          "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

          KYPack

          Comment


          • #95
            5 championships
            1 championship
            Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by The Shadow
              5 championships
              1 championship
              Come on Shadow. You know that comparing championships won only works on Viking fans.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by The Shadow
                5 championships
                1 championship
                10 HOF players/coaches in support
                Herb Adderly
                Willie Davis
                Forrest Gregg
                Paul Hornung
                Henry Jordan
                Ray Nitschke
                Jim Taylor
                Willie Wood
                Jim Ringo
                Vince Lombardi

                1 HOF players/coaches in support
                Reggie White

                To suggest Favre could not have won 5 titles with 10 HOF caliber people around him is stupid.
                My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Zool
                  Do you think Griese was better than Marino? He played in 3 straight and won 2 superbowls. Marino played in 1 and won 0.
                  Of course Shadow thinks Griese is better than Marino.

                  2 championships
                  0 championships

                  Trent Dilfer, Mark Rypien and Eli Manning are also better than Marino according to Shadow's logic.
                  My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by The Leaper
                    Originally posted by Zool
                    Do you think Griese was better than Marino? He played in 3 straight and won 2 superbowls. Marino played in 1 and won 0.
                    Of course Shadow thinks Griese is better than Marino.

                    2 championships
                    0 championships

                    Trent Dilfer, Mark Rypien and Eli Manning are also better than Marino according to Shadow's logic.
                    Does that mean Stan Humphries is as good as Marino? He took the Chargers to the SB one year.
                    Originally posted by 3irty1
                    This is museum quality stupidity.

                    Comment


                    • Bacon beats Shakin'.
                      Cash over Flash.
                      Ring trumps Bling.
                      Championships beat ....... Duh'o!
                      Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

                      Comment


                      • Well shit Shadow, I'm going to revise my top10 QB's of all time to include Brad Johnson and Jeff Hostetler.
                        Originally posted by 3irty1
                        This is museum quality stupidity.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X