Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PFT - FAVRE IS DONE?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PFT - FAVRE IS DONE?

    FAVRE IS DONE?
    Posted by Mike Florio on July 21, 2008, 8:30 p.m.

    We’ve gone 14 straight stories without mentioning Brett Favre, but due to an unconfirmed tip we received today we’ve got to break the string.

    We reiterate that this is an unconfirmed tip. Then again, unconfirmed tips have been working out pretty well for us of late, so we’re more inclined than usual to press our luck.

    Per the tipster, Favre is abandoning his attempt to return to the NFL. We’re told the Packers presented him with a list of three teams to which they’d attempt to trade him, and that Favre refused each one.

    If this is accurate, Favre will be the first high-profile pro athlete who damaged his legacy by not playing for a new team late in his career. Last week’s shameful attempt to win the P.R. battle and to pressure the Packers into letting Brett have his way blew up in Favre’s face, with his surname suddenly less likely to conjure images of championships than to induce nausea.

    But even if it’s accurate, look for this thing to continue to bubble up from time to time. We had to endure six years of stories regarding whether he’ll retire; we very well could be destined to have six years of stories regarding whether he’ll unretire.

    And if Aaron Rodgers tears, rips, or pops a critical part of his anatomy, it’ll be interesting to see whether the Packers would give him a call — and whether, if they do, Favre will pick up the phone. The events of the last 10 days might have made a zero-year reunion impossible.

    Meanwhile, Favre’s apparent decision not to try to return doesn’t change in any way the tampering charge the Packers filed last week against the Vikings. So even though the story of Brett’s potential return could be dead, he did just enough to give us something that we can continue to cover for the next several months.

    Whether we want to or not.

    Find all the latest ProFootballTalk news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.
    "When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time" Max McGee

  • #2
    Who are the three alleged teams the Packers would be willing to trade Favre?

    Comment


    • #3
      I was just getting ready to post this. If Favre can't come back and start for the Pack, this is the best scenario as a Packers fan. I guess if this is true, the "When will Rodgers get injured and Brett step in" talk will start up.

      Comment


      • #4
        You really think Favre will come back to TT and MM now when they get in a jam if this idea of theirs dont pan out? I highly doubt it...


        This young team, and talented and good they are, is being put in an experiment with a unproven QB now... we'll see if TT is a good poker player cuz he's all in...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by oregonpackfan
          Who are the three alleged teams the Packers would be willing to trade Favre?
          I'm not sure. The following AFC teams have the cap room to take him: Jacksonville, San Diego, Buffalo, Miami, and Kansas City. Jacksonville and San Diego are set at QB at this point barring injury and wouldn't give Favre a shot at a starter, so I would guess the list consisted of "Buffalo, Miami, and Kansas City".
          </delurk>

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't buy this one bit

            But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
            TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

            Comment


            • #7
              I do not believe this story. The Packers told Favre they were not having him back, but if Favre is absolutely intent on playing then he still has a couple options.
              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bretsky
                I don't buy this one bit

                But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                If they only gave him three then good for them. They should take it out to the last minute the same way he does every year. It's only fair, right? Favre doesn't need time with the guys, he can jump right in so this should be no problem for him.
                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                  Originally posted by Bretsky
                  I don't buy this one bit

                  But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                  If they only gave him three then good for them. They should take it out to the last minute the same way he does every year. It's only fair, right? Favre doesn't need time with the guys, he can jump right in so this should be no problem for him.
                  Harrell.. the best part about that is that he is that good of a QB, and that good of a QB that we probably will never see again so enjoy that position for the rest of your life cuz it'll never get better than it just was, you scum..

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bretsky
                    I don't buy this one bit

                    But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                    There really are only five total teams that make sense. When you rule out: a) Teams in the NFC and b) Teams that cannot afford to take on his salary. They might have taken out the teams from consideration that they knew wouldn't want him.

                    There's nothing pukish about refusing to trade him inside your own conference or to waste everybody's time by trying to trade him to a team that can't afford him.
                    </delurk>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      which are the 5 teams that make sense Lurker?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lurker64
                        The following AFC teams have the cap room to take him: Jacksonville, San Diego, Buffalo, Miami, and Kansas City. Jacksonville and San Diego are set at QB at this point barring injury and wouldn't give Favre a shot at a starter, so I would guess the list consisted of "Buffalo, Miami, and Kansas City".
                        Quoting myself to answer your question. Favre would count $12.7 million dollars against the cap this year if he was traded, and those are the only AFC teams with at least that much cap room.

                        Out of the NFC teams Chicago, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Green Bay, and Tampa Bay are the only teams with the cap room to afford him.
                        </delurk>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pacopete4
                          Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                          Originally posted by Bretsky
                          I don't buy this one bit

                          But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                          If they only gave him three then good for them. They should take it out to the last minute the same way he does every year. It's only fair, right? Favre doesn't need time with the guys, he can jump right in so this should be no problem for him.
                          Harrell.. the best part about that is that he is that good of a QB, and that good of a QB that we probably will never see again so enjoy that position for the rest of your life cuz it'll never get better than it just was, you scum..
                          You are probably correct, we have seen the best GB QB we will ever see.

                          That doesn't mean:

                          - it wasn't time to move on.
                          - we won't have SB success in the future.
                          - that Favre handled this entire situation very well.
                          - that the Packers are not better off right now going with AR


                          Please note, I did not say AR is better than BF. Just that we might be better off. The NYG were better without Shockey last season, yet Shockey was a better TE than his back up.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by cheesner
                            Originally posted by Pacopete4
                            Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                            Originally posted by Bretsky
                            I don't buy this one bit

                            But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                            If they only gave him three then good for them. They should take it out to the last minute the same way he does every year. It's only fair, right? Favre doesn't need time with the guys, he can jump right in so this should be no problem for him.
                            Harrell.. the best part about that is that he is that good of a QB, and that good of a QB that we probably will never see again so enjoy that position for the rest of your life cuz it'll never get better than it just was, you scum..
                            You are probably correct, we have seen the best GB QB we will ever see.

                            That doesn't mean:

                            - it wasn't time to move on.
                            - we won't have SB success in the future.
                            - that Favre handled this entire situation very well.
                            - that the Packers are not better off right now going with AR


                            Please note, I did not say AR is better than BF. Just that we might be better off. The NYG were better without Shockey last season, yet Shockey was a better TE than his back up.

                            Cheesner, you could be exactly right and to be honest I hope you are since it will be Arod this season, I just think Harrell is an unappreciative little prick, ya that about sums it up...

                            Lurker, sorry bud.. I guess I should learn how to read? haha

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bretsky
                              I don't buy this one bit

                              But if TT and MM only gave him three teams to consider, then they are both pukes
                              the fact that they even considered the idea of listing teams in advance is enough. any other player, and he would be gone and TT would have more draft picks to play with. and three teams sounds about the right number anyway. first, favre will probably not play for the NFC at all in the chance that packers play them. second, the teams on this year's schedule is off the list. so that basically leaves the AFC west, north, and east (since we play with afc south).

                              afc west-chiefs
                              afc east-bills, jets, dolphins
                              afc north-maybe baltimore but i don't think they have cap room

                              so there are only really 4 teams to consider and maybe TT was nice and scratch off dolphins because they are rebuilding from the bottom up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X