Good Job Thompson....It Only Took 4 Years.

[Deputy Nutz]

holy shit get some fucking help--your next move is gonna be in a tower with a damn deer rifle

Don't bother with him. He is not worth your time or effort. Just keep bringing the quality.

I think you are a snake, a little snake in the grass. And if you really think Sheepshit brings quality then you are off your fuck stick.

Actually I think you are dirty shitfaced traitor. Sure you back the Pack, but as soon as the leader of this team does something you don't like you feel for the first time in 16 years you can open up your shit gobbler and slam Favre. He was always too good for you it is a shame that you took the privilage of watching him, you didn't deserve it.

[The Shadow]

13 -3?
NFC North Division champ?
Youngest team in NFL?
Executive of the Year?
Healthy salary cap?

What a nefarious, reprehensible, ignoble agenda!!!!!!

[Patler]

Not really, just makes my point: Don't disagree or point out the obvious in here, it's all about mindless rhetoric that goes round and round. If and when one of these self glorified fanatics has a thought of their own, let me know. Until then, it's all about them, not about the Packers. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to repeat what they hear from someone else and claim it to be their own...

I calmly and politely replied to your entire post. I stated my opinions and, more importantly, reasons for my opinions. You provided little in support of your statements in your original post, yet you reply to me only dismissively.

Is my opinion to be ignored simply because I disagree with you????
Am I self glorified simply because I provided opinions and the reasons for those opinions?
Are your opinions right and "obvious" because they are yours, and mine simply inconsequential because they differ from yours?
Am I less of a Packer fan than you, simply because we have different opinions?

[Zool]

This should about narrow it down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_YHV5fdUiQ

[SkinBasket]

Not really, just makes my point: Don't disagree or point out the obvious in here, it's all about mindless rhetoric that goes round and round. If and when one of these self glorified fanatics has a thought of their own, let me know. Until then, it's all about them, not about the Packers. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to repeat what they hear from someone else and claim it to be their own...

I calmly and politely replied to your entire post. I stated my opinions and, more importantly, reasons for my opinions. You provided little in support of your statements in your original post, yet you reply to me only dismissively.

Is my opinion to be ignored simply because I disagree with you????
Am I self glorified simply because I provided opinions and the reasons for those opinions?
Are your opinions right and "obvious" because they are yours, and mine simply inconsequential because they differ from yours?
Am I less of a Packer fan than you, simply because we have different opinions?

Nice autopsy Dr. Patler. Although the subject was a bit dim.

[sharpe1027]

Not really, just makes my point: Don't disagree or point out the obvious in here, it's all about mindless rhetoric that goes round and round. If and when one of these self glorified fanatics has a thought of their own, let me know. Until then, it's all about them, not about the Packers. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to repeat what they hear from someone else and claim it to be their own...

I thought Patler's response was very well thought out and provided explict reasoning for his positions. What point does that prove, that you refuse to consider other's opinions and dismiss them out-of-hand as mindless rhetoric without providing any reason other than you don't agree? Point taken.

[cpk1994]

holy shit get some fucking help--your next move is gonna be in a tower with a damn deer rifle

Don't bother with him. He is not worth your time or effort. Just keep bringing the quality.

I think you are a snake, a little snake in the grass. And if you really think Sheepshit brings quality then you are off your fuck stick.

Actually I think you are dirty shitfaced traitor. Sure you back the Pack, but as soon as the leader of this team does something you don't like you feel for the first time in 16 years you can open up your shit gobbler and slam Favre. He was always too good for you it is a shame that you took the privilage of watching him, you didn't deserve it.

You've just proven my point. I rest my case, your honor!

[cpk1994]

Not really, just makes my point: Don't disagree or point out the obvious in here, it's all about mindless rhetoric that goes round and round. If and when one of these self glorified fanatics has a thought of their own, let me know. Until then, it's all about them, not about the Packers. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to repeat what they hear from someone else and claim it to be their own...

I calmly and politely replied to your entire post. I stated my opinions and, more importantly, reasons for my opinions. You provided little in support of your statements in your original post, yet you reply to me only dismissively.

Is my opinion to be ignored simply because I disagree with you????
Am I self glorified simply because I provided opinions and the reasons for those opinions?
Are your opinions right and "obvious" because they are yours, and mine simply inconsequential because they differ from yours?
Am I less of a Packer fan than you, simply because we have different opinions?

Nice autopsy Dr. Patler. Although the subject was a bit dim.

Indeed.

[sheepshead]

Sometimes..all you can do is shake your head and move on. This...is one of those times.

[Patler]

Sometimes..all you can do is shake your head and move on. This...is one of those times.

But it hurts when I do that, and the banging and clanging is intolerable?

[Scott Campbell]

I thought Patler's response was very well thought out and provided explict reasoning for his positions.

Well thought out?

He replied to Merlin. The response shouldn't have surprised anybody but the Noobs.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

So how 'bout that old Damien Woody?

Don't worry. I'll have some counter articles soon.

[Fritz]

Given the direction of this thread, I think our Damien Woodyfest seems off track.

I will say I like the guy's name. I think when the New York writers ask Favre how he likes his new offensive line, it will be sad if Favre does not reply by saying "Well, I've never had a Woody from my offensive line before."

Thank you. Thank you very much. I'll be here all week, and don't forget to tip the waitstaff.

[cpk1994]

Given the direction of this thread, I think our Damien Woodyfest seems off track.

I will say I like the guy's name. I think when the New York writers ask Favre how he likes his new offensive line, it will be sad if Favre does not reply by saying "Well, I've never had a Woody from my offensive line before."

Thank you. Thank you very much. I'll be here all week, and don't forget to tip the waitstaff.

And try the veal!

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Given the direction of this thread, I think our Damien Woodyfest seems off track.

I will say I like the guy's name. I think when the New York writers ask Favre how he likes his new offensive line, it will be sad if Favre does not reply by saying "Well, I've never had a Woody from my offensive line before."

Thank you. Thank you very much. I'll be here all week, and don't forget to tip the waitstaff.

I counter your woody argument with (from usa toay):

It changed my life," the 6-foot-3, 340-pound Woody said. "It was an eye-opening experience about eating habits that finally gave me the tools to deal with something I've been struggling with my whole career.

"I lost 40-some pounds and that was the first step in the whole process for me this year."

But unlike many pro athletes that get demoted, Woody kept his mouth shut, worked hard and hoped good things would happen.

After three games on the inactive list, he slowly worked his way onto the field as a reserve.

Starting right tackle George Foster fell out of favor with the coaches and Jonathan Scott was injured, leading to Woody playing the position for the first time since he was at Patrick Henry High School in Virginia.

Woody not only became a starter, but an effective one.

When Detroit (6-8) hosts the Kansas City Chiefs (4-10) on Sunday in its home finale, Woody will be in the lineup for the fourth straight game.

"He had an opportunity to resurrect his career and he came back with that mind-set and he's done a good job," Chiefs coach Herm Edwards said. "Sometimes with offensive linemen, they really go unnoticed."

Woody has certainly been noticed by coaches and teammates, earning rave reviews for the way he has salvaged something out of what has been a disappointing season for a team that might be the first in NFL history to win six of its first eight games and finish 6-10.

"I can't tell you how impressive he's been really," Detroit coach Rod Marinelli said. "It's been remarkable. The protections have improved dramatically with him at right tackle."