The 0 for 7 stat

[Pugger]

I thought I read somewhere online that we are one of the top teams as far as 4th quarter scoring so you can't say AR isn't trying to close out games. Yes, he's had some picks late in games but that happens to all QBs sometimes, especially ones who are pressing cuz he knows his D gives the lead away in frightening speed.

[oregonpackfan]

Impressive stats and argument, Harv. Now, please send your post and stats to Tony Kornheiser. I am sick and tired of hearing him ramble on how the Packers made a mistake in not bringing back Brett Favre.

[Partial]

Re: The 0 for 7 stat

Very nicely put, You cant pin any of this on our boy A-rod.
He shoulda been going to the pro bowl.

I don't think he deserves the Pro Bowl, but neither does our former QB. Rodgers played as well as our former QB did this year.

Why the need to bring up Favre? You have a vendetta and its irritating.

[sharpe1027]

Re: The 0 for 7 stat

Why the need to bring up Favre? You have a vendetta and its irritating.

People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

[Sparkey]

Re: The 0 for 7 stat

Very nicely put, You cant pin any of this on our boy A-rod.
He shoulda been going to the pro bowl.

I don't think he deserves the Pro Bowl, but neither does our former QB. Rodgers played as well as our former QB did this year.

Why the need to bring up Favre? You have a vendetta and its irritating.

You think Favre should go to the pro bowl ? If so, based on what ?

His stats ? His intangibles? and if they (intangibles) are so great why is the team falling flat on its face ?

Lets see:

Favre
7th in the AFC in passing yards
10th in the AFC in yards per attempt
8th in the AFC for passing yards per game
tied for 4th in touchdowns
8th in the AFC in Qb rating
1st - (yes he leads one stat) in NFL in Interceptions!

Wow, I am wrong. Looking at these numbers, he definately is a pro bowler this year !

[Partial]

No, I don't think he should go to the pro bowl. This thread isn't about Favre, the pro bowl, or anything relevant to either one.

It's really convinenant that if I want to post something positive about Favre, I will get flamed if its not in the Favre thread, yet outside of it, guys like Harv take every opportunity to bash a hall-of-famer.

[sharpe1027]

No, I don't think he should go to the pro bowl. This thread isn't about Favre, the pro bowl, or anything relevant to either one.

It's really convinenant that if I want to post something positive about Favre, I will get flamed if its not in the Favre thread, yet outside of it, guys like Harv take every opportunity to bash a hall-of-famer.

I'm pretty sure that Harv's point was that pro-bowls bids don't go to the best candidates.

Cry me a river.

[prsnfoto]

The other stat they were hammering was his QB rating inside of 5:00 I think was 45 which is pathetic, but he has to get discouraged that he keeps putting them in a position to win and the D keeps letting him down. My only fear is that this becomes habit and next year it starts again and he becomes tramatized much like young QB's that get sacked too much. It could fuck up his head.

[RashanGary]

The other stat they were hammering was his QB rating inside of 5:00 I think was 45 which is pathetic, but he has to get discouraged that he keeps putting them in a position to win and the D keeps letting him down. My only fear is that this becomes habit and next year it starts again and he becomes tramatized much like young QB's that get sacked too much. It could fuck up his head.

I'm not worried about Rodgers head, at all. He is a very, very smart man. I think he understands that the defense stinks and understands that it has nothing to do with him although he's also smart enough to never say it out loud. He just needs to focus on being the best QB and teammate he can. I think he knows that.

[esoxx]

Re: The 0 for 7 stat

Very nicely put, You cant pin any of this on our boy A-rod.
He shoulda been going to the pro bowl.

I don't think he deserves the Pro Bowl, but neither does our former QB. Rodgers played as well as our former QB did this year.

Which is really the whole point of this thread, although veiled.

Yeah, we get it.

[cpk1994]

Impressive stats and argument, Harv. Now, please send your post and stats to Tony Kornheiser. I am sick and tired of hearing him ramble on how the Packers made a mistake in not bringing back Brett Favre.

Also send a copy to Skip Bayless, that is if Skip can unchap his lips from Favre's ass long enough to read it.

[gex]

Re: The 0 for 7 stat

Very nicely put, You cant pin any of this on our boy A-rod.
He shoulda been going to the pro bowl.

I don't think he deserves the Pro Bowl, but neither does our former QB. Rodgers played as well as our former QB did this year.

Which is really the whole point of this thread, although veiled.

Yeah, we get it.

Thank you for pointing that out!
I like OUR qb as much as anybody...he's a young kid learning... but Harv seems to be getting paid by A-rod's PR dept.
I don't see the need to put down a Huge part of the great Packer history in every thread that gets started.
We really do get it it already

[channtheman]

I was thinking the same thing when they threw that stat up there. I knew it wasn't accurate and it was trying to get people to think that Rodgers hasn't led his team to a tie or lead at all, when that is just bullshit.

As for you guys whining about Favre, stfu. You sound like a bunch of whiny bitches.

[SnakeLH2006]

Personally I ain't whining for Brettie, but Arod has been pretty good till the 4th QT. He dissolves.... Stats don't lie. Rodger's 4th QT stats are abysmal, maybe not the sole reason we are 5-10 but it's not good: 44 QB rating in the 4th QT.

That is pretty damn bad. Dude is not clutch in ANY way. Hopefully he does better next year or in the future, but with that shit, he looks lost. Just saying...

What's a good QB...one who wins games late or just wins games (0-7 or 5-10) so take your pick. Lots to prove yet...Hard to flame those stats...But go ahead, I like Arod, but no reason to get carried away making decorations for the bandwagon till we win some fucking games (5-10).

[Gunakor]

Personally I ain't whining for Brettie, but Arod has been pretty good till the 4th QT. He dissolves.... Stats don't lie. Rodger's 4th QT stats are abysmal, maybe not the sole reason we are 5-10 but it's not good: 44 QB rating in the 4th QT.

That is pretty damn bad. Dude is not clutch in ANY way. Hopefully he does better next year or in the future, but with that shit, he looks lost. Just saying...

What's a good QB...one who wins games late or just wins games (0-7 or 5-10) so take your pick. Lots to prove yet...Hard to flame those stats...But go ahead, I like Arod, but no reason to get carried away making decorations for the bandwagon till we win some fucking games (5-10).

Well, he's still clutch in the fact that he has one of the highest QB ratings in the league on third down. But I agree, his 4th quarter production leaves a little to be desired. I just wonder if that low 4th quarter QB rating has a lot to do with him pressing more than he should, due to the defensive meltdowns that also occur in the 4th quarter.