If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
So, in the interest of fairness, are we allowed to make jokes that are somewhat critical of Favre and still remain "above the fray"?
You can only make jokes backing Favre, not against him. If you make jokes against Favre you are a trouble-maker. Mad really needs to put a sticky up about this.
So, in the interest of fairness, are we allowed to make jokes that are somewhat critical of Favre and still remain "above the fray"?
You can only make jokes backing Favre, not against him. If you make jokes against Favre you are a trouble-maker. Mad really needs to put a sticky up about this.
Sorry, I didn't really see any "jokes". Most of what I saw was very mean-hearted comments about someone that gave the Packers many winning seasons. Guess I'm just a bit more sentimental then most of you. I have that ability to show respect for the past.
What does Pennington mean to me? NADA. If what Favre did for the Green Bay Packers means nothing to you, carry on. Have at it.
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
I understand. I'm not singling her out. Many people have spent all season propping up Favre, tearing down TT, and generally gloating over Favre and the Jets.
Now, for the past 5 weeks, they have wanted to silence the "Favre-haters" and just drop the whole argument. Anyone who wants to talk about Favre NOW is considered to be someone who is obsessed with Favre and holding on to the past. Where was that the first 12 weeks of the season? It just seems a bit hypocritical to me.
I personally have no problem with it either way. You know what you get when you look in the Favre thread.
Paco and I don't see eye-to-eye on almost anything. I still like seeing his point of view. If I don't feel like it is worth it to try and tell him how I think he is wrong I simply skip his posts. Nothing wrong with that.
I understand. I'm not singling her out. Many people have spent all season propping up Favre, tearing down TT, and generally gloating over Favre and the Jets.
Now, for the past 5 weeks, they have wanted to silence the "Favre-haters" and just drop the whole argument. Anyone who wants to talk about Favre NOW is considered to be someone who is obsessed with Favre and holding on to the past. Where was that the first 12 weeks of the season? It just seems a bit hypocritical to me.
I personally have no problem with it either way. You know what you get when you look in the Favre thread.
Paco and I don't see eye-to-eye on almost anything. I still like seeing his point of view. If I don't feel like it is worth it to try and tell him how I think he is wrong I simply skip his posts. Nothing wrong with that.
Then take it to PM. I don't give a shit. I'm cleaning this joint up. Get on the train or get out of the way.
I understand. I'm not singling her out. Many people have spent all season propping up Favre, tearing down TT, and generally gloating over Favre and the Jets.
Now, for the past 5 weeks, they have wanted to silence the "Favre-haters" and just drop the whole argument. Anyone who wants to talk about Favre NOW is considered to be someone who is obsessed with Favre and holding on to the past. Where was that the first 12 weeks of the season? It just seems a bit hypocritical to me.
I personally have no problem with it either way. You know what you get when you look in the Favre thread.
Paco and I don't see eye-to-eye on almost anything. I still like seeing his point of view. If I don't feel like it is worth it to try and tell him how I think he is wrong I simply skip his posts. Nothing wrong with that.
Then take it to PM. I don't give a shit. I'm cleaning this joint up. Get on the train or get out of the way.
Are you kidding me?
I guess the next time there is a topic about Rodgers and you disagree with someone I should expect not to see any of your posts in there right? Cause you'll have just PM'ed posters instead?
I understand. I'm not singling her out. Many people have spent all season propping up Favre, tearing down TT, and generally gloating over Favre and the Jets.
Now, for the past 5 weeks, they have wanted to silence the "Favre-haters" and just drop the whole argument. Anyone who wants to talk about Favre NOW is considered to be someone who is obsessed with Favre and holding on to the past. Where was that the first 12 weeks of the season? It just seems a bit hypocritical to me.
I personally have no problem with it either way. You know what you get when you look in the Favre thread.
Paco and I don't see eye-to-eye on almost anything. I still like seeing his point of view. If I don't feel like it is worth it to try and tell him how I think he is wrong I simply skip his posts. Nothing wrong with that.
I'm not sure there are that many
The gloaters might be paco, mobb, and maybe gex at times
The other extremists who do the same thing but on the anti side may be led by cpk and probably shadow
And then there is a load of people who lean one way, still read, and get irked by some comments.
Overall not that many when you consider how many posters we have. I browsed over a couple other forums yesterday and one was 5x as bad as this one in terms of Favre threads and the other was about the same.
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Comment