Josh Jacobs Charged With Domestic Abuse

[Vincenzo]

Man this disapeared.

No shit….
But I’m not sure why.

Hope it doesn’t sting us at some point.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

No shit….
But I’m not sure why.

Hope it doesn’t sting us at some point.

I know why.

DA: So Policy, the evidence against Jacobs is hardcore dammed. Simply put, the Filipino Bulldog is fucked. I called this meeting to give you a chance to offer a “gift” in exchange for case dismissal.

Policy: Fuck you. You know I am Italian, right. Know what that means?

DA: You dig pasta, cheese and wine, and your women are hot. I reckon, Dianna Russini is hot as hell.

Policy: The fuck with your dumb Italian stereotypes. My uncle is head of the Lovato crime family. Drop the fucking case.

DA: Are you threatening I, the esteemed DA of Green Bay, with extortion?

Policy: Uh, fuck. Drop the fucking case and we’ll ship you an official Super Bowl ring if we win it all this year.

DA: I woulda settled for a humble Italiana escort, but you’ve got yourself a deal.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

DBL post.

[Tony Oday]

No shit….
But I’m not sure why.

Hope it doesn’t sting us at some point.

Agreed. It seems like they reviewed the actual evidence and it showed that there is no reason that it even was in the news cycle.

[George Cumby]

No shit….
But I’m not sure why.

Problematic fact pattern/witness(es)/victim(s)/difficulty getting to probable cause/difficulty getting to Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.

The longer it drags, the better it looks for Jacobs.

[texaspackerbacker]

True, but the damn NFL has their own standard. The hell with reasonable doubt. They suspend anyway.

[Joemailman]

Problematic fact pattern/witness(es)/victim(s)/difficulty getting to probable cause/difficulty getting to Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.

The longer it drags, the better it looks for Jacobs.

I'm not so sure. If they're planning on filing charges, they might have more loose ends to tie up before doing so. It could go either way. I don't think the passage of time tells us anything really.

[MadScientist]

I'm not so sure. If they're planning on filing charges, they might have more loose ends to tie up before doing so. It could go either way. I don't think the passage of time tells us anything really.

It's clear that it isn't a slam dunk on the evidence in hand. If the woman had retracted her story, or said she won't press charges (typical in cases like this after money changed hands), the DA likely would say something about charges being dropped.

[pbmax]

It's clear that it isn't a slam dunk on the evidence in hand. If the woman had retracted her story, or said she won't press charges (typical in cases like this after money changed hands), the DA likely would say something about charges being dropped.

They said they were chasing more information. Hard to say how long that might take or if folks would cooperate.

[MadScientist]

They said they were chasing more information. Hard to say how long that might take or if folks would cooperate.

Beyond interviews (or examinations) with the two people involved and maybe some neighbors that may have heard things, there isn't much else that they can do to get more information. It could well be at a point where they think Jacobs did what was reported, but they don't have enough for a conviction. The case might be permanently stuck there.