I know that the debate on this thread is mostly about our corners. But last year I thought our biggest coverage liability was our line backers combined with the scheme. After the New Orleans game when people wanted to move the ball through the air they ran TE, slot receivers and RBs on short to intermediate routes and ate us up in the middle of the field.
I mean Al had a bad day against Detroit and Woodson got beaten by Steve Smith to cost us the game, but our corners from one to three were really solid and not much responsible for all our late game collapses.
As far as depth rising to a starting position. Bush will never be the preferred starter. I'd be surprised if Blackmon rises further than a nickel. Lee looks like he physically has it. He just had no idea what the fuck was going on last year.
So, we've got two good/great corners for this year and maybe next, an heir apparent at nickel and some developmental guys who can earn their keep on special teams. Also, a coach that may be able to scheme underneath coverage to deny the short routes that killed us last year. Sounds pretty good to me.
I mean Al had a bad day against Detroit and Woodson got beaten by Steve Smith to cost us the game, but our corners from one to three were really solid and not much responsible for all our late game collapses.
As far as depth rising to a starting position. Bush will never be the preferred starter. I'd be surprised if Blackmon rises further than a nickel. Lee looks like he physically has it. He just had no idea what the fuck was going on last year.
So, we've got two good/great corners for this year and maybe next, an heir apparent at nickel and some developmental guys who can earn their keep on special teams. Also, a coach that may be able to scheme underneath coverage to deny the short routes that killed us last year. Sounds pretty good to me.

Comment