Originally posted by MJZiggy
M. Vick killed dogs and Donte Stallworth killed a human being.
Your position is that Donte Stallworth is 'seriously remorseful', as opposed to the conciounce of M. Vick that is based in his dramatically reduced income level.
Donte Stallworth got behind the wheel of his vehicle and started the engine and drove while over the limit for alcohol and thus elected to make himself 'at least' eligible for a DUI. He ventured a risk certainly for himself and failed to forsee all the consequences of that decision. He made that choice and someone else suffered the consequences of his lousy decision MJ. The worst case scenario. He killed a person other than himself.
Bad luck or bad judgement? Your judgement finds for Donte Stallworth over M. Vick MJ in terms of conciounce. Donte Stallworth demonstrated bad judgement and carelessness in a far more serious and consequential outcome than M. Vick. The death of a human being.
I believe that both men made decisions that led to outcomes that seriously affected their lives. M. Vick paid a high price for an unlawful act. The disgrace that led to will always lead him back to his consciounce no less that what Donte Stallworth presently feels. A proper consciounce isn't limited by the seriousness of the crime nor the price of the offense when it's exposed to the public eye and punished.
I believe that both M. Vick and Donte Stallworth are equally and seriously remorseful MJ for their actions and consequences.



Comment